F
FCEGM
Guest
Much in the same manner as He allowed Judas’ betrayal in the formation of His Church.Actually, if you read the Catholic Professor’s work… I think you will see how God used Martin Luther to correct the Catholic Church.
Much in the same manner as He allowed Judas’ betrayal in the formation of His Church.Actually, if you read the Catholic Professor’s work… I think you will see how God used Martin Luther to correct the Catholic Church.
I have to post that both Pope Benedict and I disagree with your statement. Happy Reformation Day, or Happy Halloween.Much in the same manner as He allowed Judas’ betrayal in the formation of His Church.
My Pope says nothing here about the rightness of Luther’s revolt and it being a cause for celebration.I have to post that both Pope Benedict and I disagree with your statement. Happy Reformation Day, or Happy Halloween.
“The wall is no longer necessary; our common identity within the diversity of cultures is Christ, and it is he who makes us just. Being just simply means being with Christ and in Christ. And this suffices. Further observances are no longer necessary. For this reason Luther’s phrase: “faith alone” is true, if it is not opposed to faith in charity, in love. Faith is looking at Christ, entrusting oneself to Christ, being united to Christ, conformed to Christ, to his life. And the form, the life of Christ, is love; hence to believe is to conform to Christ and to enter into his love. So it is that in the Letter to the Galatians in which he primarily developed his teaching on justification St Paul speaks of faith that works through love (cf. Gal 5: 14).” - Your Pope
If you study the links on my signature, the Pope and the professor speaks positive things about Martin Luther,… way more than your typical Catholic. Please try to pray and study the links. Martin Luther is not your enemy, nor am I.My Pope says nothing here about the rightness of Luther’s revolt and it being a cause for celebration.![]()
And it is up for debate which Church that is, even if you exclude Protestants=Rites;5774867]Perhaps. But the sin of schism is only applicable to those who are actually in schism from the true church.
I hadn’t thought about the sex scandal, but the others seem more internal events. But what you mention here sounds interesting. I take it you don’t care for Novus ordo.The sex scandal is pretty high up there, as are the rampant liturgical abuses, the dissent in the religious orders, the suppression of the Latin Mass, the disturbing lack of discipline among the hierarchy, and the destruction of beautiful churches in the name of simplicity, just to name a few.
One wonders what could have been, had both sides listened more to the Holy Spirit.Interesting how history works, isn’t it? The greatest disturbances bring about the greatest reforms.
Seems to me, we’re told we must love the Lord with all our heart, mind, and soul, and our neighbors as ourselves. If we reject Grace, we will our souls to be lost.And you are correct that we must ultimately leave everything to the grace of God, but one must ask: If heresy does not cause souls to be lost, what does?
In honor of Reformation day this year I’m reading through some historical accounts of the reformation and counter-reformation years. (If anyone wants to recommend a book to me, I would greatly appreciate it)Maybe so. Let’s see.
Can the CC accept the Augsburg Confession a truly Catholic statement and confession of faith?
If so, then reconciliation can happen.
Jon
I enjoyed reading your perspective. Much makes sense.In honor of Reformation day this year I’m reading through some historical accounts of the reformation and counter-reformation years. (If anyone wants to recommend a book to me, I would greatly appreciate it)
What strikes me most about the Augsburg Confession is that, at least as some accounts relate it, it appears to have been written as a compromise document. That is, in an attempt for reunion of the church.
It also amazes me how out of sync both sides were over those years, how when one side was ready to come to the table, the other usually for whatever reason was not. There are several occasions where, if the side with the upper hand at the time had extended a hand in charity, there may have been reconciliation.
I am also struck by the notion that it would have been relatively easy for the Catholic Church to get the Lutherans back on board in those early years, marginalizing the much more radical elements coming out of places like Zurich. In fact, at several points, Martin Luther was caught backpedaling toward orthodoxy - on the real presence and infant baptism to name a couple.
Anyway, part of me thinks the moment when adopting the Augsburg Confession would succeed in bringing any more than a small portion of Lutherans on board passed a long time ago. Those of us stragglers that are already Romophiles might come back home, but can anyone say it would bring any major Lutheran synod with it? Maybe a few old-world European Churches, but certainly no major American synod.
No, were I Catholic, I’d just wait the protestants out. It’s gone 500 years, it can go a bit longer until we see where exactly American Lutheranism is headed.
I was wondering if anyone was going to call me on my creative abuse of the english language. Guess so.I enjoyed reading your perspective. Much makes sense.
Romophiles.I like that. Guess there’s too many Romophobes, however.
Jon
As a Catholic I am forced to disagree with that.And it is up for debate which Church that is, even if you exclude Protestants
All abuses are internal events until they lead to formal heresy or schism. And you are right, I do not care for the Novus Ordo Mass. I view the outright suppression of the Old Mass as one of the worst Church abuses in recent history.I hadn’t thought about the sex scandal, but the others seem more internal events. But what you mention here sounds interesting. I take it you don’t care for Novus ordo.
Indeed. At least we can still hope for the future though.One wonders what could have been, had both sides listened more to the Holy Spirit.
Well heresy, I think, very much entails a rejection of grace.Seems to me, we’re told we must love the Lord with all our heart, mind, and soul, and our neighbors as ourselves. If we reject Grace, we will our souls to be lost.
=Rites;5786209]As a Catholic I am forced to disagree with that.
Absolutely, and pray too.Indeed. At least we can still hope for the future though.
Well, perhaps true, or not. You and I may disagree on what is heresy. I don’t doubt, however, His grace is extended to you, even if I think your communion mixes Truth with error.Well heresy, I think, very much entails a rejection of grace.
As a catholic what you say is very reassuring and comforting to me. However, I feel such sadness when I think that we are all christians yet we are so divided. I pray that His love will be strong enough in men to inspire them towards reconciliation.After being away for a few days, I’m just getting caught up on my CA Forum reading and find this thread particularly fascinating.
I appreciate the OP’s wish of a “Happy Reformation Day.” I will celebrate it because it is through the Lutheran tradition in which I was raised that I came to know and love God - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I will celebrate it because it is through that tradition that I have come to know that God loves me despite all of my imperfections – a love so strong that he sent his son for the salvation of the world, me included.
What I will not celebrate is continuing division among Christians. I will not celebrate the fact that we do not join together in receiving the body and blood of our Lord before the altar. I will not celebrate in the old “Lutherans are right - Catholics are wrong” style which I remember from my early years.
My prayer on this coming Reformation Day will be that the Holy Spirit will, in whatever time God chooses, to bring us together as one.
No one is suggesting celebrating this holiday, only that we extend a hand of friendship to others who wish to our neighbors. I also wish Jewish people and Muslims I know all the best on the holidays the celebrate. It is a statement of courtesy, not theology.Why are we celebrating this?
Peter Kreeft was part of ECT. What do you think about the future of ECT, or an ECT 3?No one is suggesting celebrating this holiday, only that we extend a hand of friendship to others who wish to our neighbors. I also wish Jewish people and Muslims I know all the best on the holidays the celebrate. It is a statement of courtesy, not theology.
Thank you Adam from bringing the sanity and wisdom of Peter Kreeft into this discussion. No, he does not trump any Council, but it is scarcely necessary to do so. They speak of different things. Yes, faith alone when it is not alone is an acceptable idea if the word “alone” has a different meaning.
Peter Kreeft was part of ECT. What do you think about the future of ECT, or an ECT 3?
seekgod.ca/ect2.htm
**Evangelicals and Catholics Together **
God used martin luther to correct the Church? how? by bringing in writings and ideas that caused social and religious upheavel. that brought in antisemitic teachings that were used to by hitler to kill 6 million jews? God used martin luther? or was it teachings that caused all this confusion and opinions of man that has given us soooo many denominations. this is the movement you wish to celebrate? if so, leave me out of it.God is always sovereign, and through Providence… God used Martin Luther to correct the church.
It’s a matter of what glasses we have on. It seems a particular orthodox Catholic on this site believed that Pope Leo was a wolf. Therefore, I say Happy Reformation to that Catholic with that view. Please check out post 955 on this thread.God used martin luther to correct the Church? how? by bringing in writings and ideas that caused social and religious upheavel. that brought in antisemitic teachings that were used to by hitler to kill 6 million jews? God used martin luther? or was it teachings that caused all this confusion and opinions of man that has given us soooo many denominations. this is the movement you wish to celebrate? if so, leave me out of it.![]()
lenses have very little to do with it. so do you agree with luthers antisemitic views? i didnt get these from any Catholic publications. these are from jewish publications. so the glasses i have on have little to do with hisrorical facts. and they are, the upheavel death and destruction, and confusion that martin luthers teachings have brought. again, i see no reason to celebrate such a tragic movement.It’s a matter of what glasses we have on. It seems a particular orthodox Catholic on this site believed that Pope Leo was a wolf. Therefore, I say Happy Reformation to that Catholic with that view. Please check out post 955 on this thread.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=388195&page=64