Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (SPOILERS!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahimsa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why take a sola scriptura approach to the Potter series? Someone should ask JKR for further clarification of these pertinent issues.
 
Just finished the book last night so i have missed all that has been said before in this thread. IMO Rowling could not have ended the book better. Even in the height of anger Harry could not bring himslef to even kill Voldermort.

Snape ends up as kinda good guy and for reasons I would never have guessed. Great book
 
Just finished the book last night so i have missed all that has been said before in this thread. IMO Rowling could not have ended the book better. Even in the height of anger Harry could not bring himslef to even kill Voldermort.

Snape ends up as kinda good guy and for reasons I would never have guessed. Great book
I’m glad you liked it. I think I’m going to reread it in the next month or so- I flew through it so fast the first time, I want to go back and savor it now.
 
I’m glad you liked it. I think I’m going to reread it in the next month or so- I flew through it so fast the first time, I want to go back and savor it now.
Same here-in fact just after I finished it I reread the last three chapter again as I was rusihng. i suspect in am month or so i will reread the whole series. It will be fun to look at the events knowing how it all ends
 
Same here-in fact just after I finished it I reread the last three chapter again as I was rusihng. i suspect in am month or so i will reread the whole series. It will be fun to look at the events knowing how it all ends
I was thinking the same thing, too. I’m going to be looking for little details that I missed in my previous 3 or 4 readings!🙂 Especially Snape and Dumbledore.
 
J.K.Rowling said there would be two major characters killed in the book. It was a lot more. Counting only the “good guys”

Hedwig
Moody
Tonks
Lupin
Colin Greevy
Fred
Snape
Dobye

In fact her first six books were littered with dead good guys:

James
Lily
Sirius
Cedric
Dumbledore

And a few with fried brains

The Longbottoms
Kenneth Branaugh

Who have I missed?
 
J.K.Rowling said there would be two major characters killed in the book. It was a lot more. Counting only the “good guys”

Hedwig
Moody
Tonks
Lupin
Colin Greevy
Fred
Snape
Dobye

In fact her first six books were littered with dead good guys:

James
Lily
Sirius
Cedric
Dumbledore

And a few with fried brains

The Longbottoms
Kenneth Branaugh

Who have I missed?
Not much. There are some new character that met an quick demise - Bathilda Bagshot, Ted Tonks, etc.

Oh and Kenneth Branaugh’s character was Gilderoy Lockhart (DADA teacher, book #2).
 
Not much. There are some new character that met an quick demise - Bathilda Bagshot, Ted Tonks, etc.

Oh and Kenneth Branaugh’s character was Gilderoy Lockhart (DADA teacher, book #2).
It owuld be a celbrity deat match for sure if you put Emma Thompson, Brannaugh and Helena Bonham Carter in a scene togehter in the next movie
 
It owuld be a celbrity deat match for sure if you put Emma Thompson, Brannaugh and Helena Bonham Carter in a scene togehter in the next movie
Brannaugh probably won’t be in the next one since Lockhart wasn’t in the Half-Blood Prince. Trelawney (Emma Thompson) might and Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange probably will be in the next one.
 
Brannaugh probably won’t be in the next one since Lockhart wasn’t in the Half-Blood Prince. Trelawney (Emma Thompson) might and Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange probably will be in the next one.
Is it the Order of the Phoenix or The Half Blood Prince where they run across Lockhart in the Psyco ward?
 
Order of the Phoenix, but the hospital was cut out completely from the movie.
As\was Kreacher. I winder if we could convince them to make deathly Hallows intotwo movies -like they did with Pirates. There has ben a lot left out of the last two movies as the books got longer
 
As\was Kreacher. I winder if we could convince them to make deathly Hallows intotwo movies -like they did with Pirates. There has ben a lot left out of the last two movies as the books got longer
As I remember, Kreacher WAS in the OOTP movie…Sirius (Gary Oldman) yelled at him when Harry discovered the Black family tapestry hanging at 12 Grimmauld Place. Unfortunately, his part was not very big in the movie, unlike the book.
 
As I remember, Kreacher WAS in the OOTP movie…Sirius (Gary Oldman) yelled at him when Harry discovered the Black family tapestry hanging at 12 Grimmauld Place. Unfortunately, his part was not very big in the movie, unlike the book.
He had two small appearances, one when Harry arrived at 12 Grimmauld Place and then when Sirius yelled at him.
 
Why take a sola scriptura approach to the Potter series? Someone should ask JKR for further clarification of these pertinent issues.
I just watched an interview with JKR. Harry and Ron actually turn out to be the best aurors ever-- they more or less, “revolutionize,” or should I say, “revolutionise” that dept. of the Ministry of Magic. Hermione is doing something in the enforcement of Magical Law.

As for the religious issues and the book, she says that she couldn’t put more of it in previous books because it might give away the ending, and a lot of it came from her own, “struggles” with belief, to hold on to belief.

-Rob
 
I just watched an interview with JKR. Harry and Ron actually turn out to be the best aurors ever-- they more or less, “revolutionize,” or should I say, “revolutionise” that dept. of the Ministry of Magic. Hermione is doing something in the enforcement of Magical Law. -Rob
Looks like Harry Potter is spawning a whole new magickal sub-culture.
 
Interesting, isn’t it, that in DH the Minister asks Hermione if she is considering a career in Magical Law, to which she snaps, “Of COURSE not! I’m going to do some good in life”! I guess this is just another little “zinger” meant to show that, as life goes on, the characters change. . .except they do not.

Harry’s treatment of Draco is still stiff. The Houses are still divided, Slytherin is still the ‘ugly duckling’, etc. Whereas Lucius Malfoy and Arthur Weasley once bickered, with Malfoy the ‘successful’ one and Arthur the 'poor but proud good guy", now it’s Ron riding the tide of celebrity and Draco now not only out of ‘power’ but physically ‘balding’ and unattractive. The fact that Ron’s treatment of Draco not only extends to him looking down on Draco but that he encourages his daughter to stomp on Draco’s SON, lessons-wise, makes it clear that Ron is just as petty as Lucius Malfoy.

It still amazes me that JK can’t be bothered to actually write this information in the book itself but treats her ‘web’ info as canon. News flash. . .not everybody has internet access. And even those who do often prefer to have ‘printed matter’ in their hands.

I was very disappointed in the book, as I have been basically since Book 3. No denying that she can turn some good phrases, but quite honestly, I feel she fell victim to her own ‘good press’. Rather than sticking to what she had originally written, she let all the fans have (name removed by moderator)ut. Too many cooks spoil the broth, as the saying goes, and this is most definitely spoilt.

We care about ‘characters’ enough to recognize when they are out of character (OOC) and are concerned by it. It is a pity and a shame that it appears that JK is more concerned over her celebrity status than about the people who made her a celebrity in the first place. . .IMO.
 
It owuld be a celbrity deat match for sure if you put Emma Thompson, Brannaugh and Helena Bonham Carter in a scene togehter in the next movie
That would be quite interesting since they have all dated or married each other in really life…BUT it ain’t going to happen

I too have wondered which characters she considered the “two characters” that would die.
 
Interesting, isn’t it, that in DH the Minister asks Hermione if she is considering a career in Magical Law, to which she snaps, “Of COURSE not! I’m going to do some good in life”! I guess this is just another little “zinger” meant to show that, as life goes on, the characters change. . .except they do not.

Harry’s treatment of Draco is still stiff. The Houses are still divided, Slytherin is still the ‘ugly duckling’, etc. Whereas Lucius Malfoy and Arthur Weasley once bickered, with Malfoy the ‘successful’ one and Arthur the 'poor but proud good guy", now it’s Ron riding the tide of celebrity and Draco now not only out of ‘power’ but physically ‘balding’ and unattractive. The fact that Ron’s treatment of Draco not only extends to him looking down on Draco but that he encourages his daughter to stomp on Draco’s SON, lessons-wise, makes it clear that Ron is just as petty as Lucius Malfoy.

It still amazes me that JK can’t be bothered to actually write this information in the book itself but treats her ‘web’ info as canon. News flash. . .not everybody has internet access. And even those who do often prefer to have ‘printed matter’ in their hands.

I was very disappointed in the book, as I have been basically since Book 3. No denying that she can turn some good phrases, but quite honestly, I feel she fell victim to her own ‘good press’. Rather than sticking to what she had originally written, she let all the fans have (name removed by moderator)ut. Too many cooks spoil the broth, as the saying goes, and this is most definitely spoilt.

We care about ‘characters’ enough to recognize when they are out of character (OOC) and are concerned by it. It is a pity and a shame that it appears that JK is more concerned over her celebrity status than about the people who made her a celebrity in the first place. . .IMO.
Did we read the same book?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top