Harry Reid: We’ll shut down government before we shut down Planned Parenthood funding

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abyssinia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No I didn’t. Which is why if you reply to this it’s only going to be another one of your silly tangents instead of some actual backing up your claim that I asked. Do you just assume people forget stuff really quickly or what?
You are correct. You didn’t ask. However, when a reference to the Nazis is made on this Forum, it tends to bring up Godwin’s Law, which has been invoked by conservative and liberal alike.

As far as silliness goes, you ought to review your own posts before casting that stone.
 
Hmm. It took 274 posts before bringing in the obligatory reference to the Nazis.
Much longer than it took for liberal Democrat catholics to bring in the obligatory justification for funding to PP because " they do lots of other good things like provide healthcare".

Ishii
 
Not illegal. Rather, it is a demonstration of Godwin’s Law, which states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.
There seems to be another law in which liberal Democrat catholics invoke the justification for supporting pro-abortion politicians because “they are for healthcare and programs for the poor”. Which is almost as frequently invoked as “I’m personally opposed to abortion but…” One hears that a lot more often than references to Nazis. Oh well.

Ishii
 
The only issue I have with PP is that tax dollars are being used to fund abortions; everything else they do I have no problem with.
From PP’s own fact sheet:

Planned Parenthood helped 7,021 patients with prenatal care and logged only 977 adoption referrals in 2009. Those combined services account for just 2% of their services to pregnant women.

**So what accounts for the other 98%? You guessed it: Abortion. Planned Parenthood performed 332,278 abortions in 2009 — in fact, Planned Parenthood is America’s largest abortion provider.
**
So for every adoption referral, Planned Parenthood performs 340 abortions. They don’t care about helping low-income pregnant women unless those low income women want an abortion!
 
From PP’s own fact sheet:

Planned Parenthood helped 7,021 patients with prenatal care and logged only 977 adoption referrals in 2009. Those combined services account for just 2% of their services to pregnant women.

So what accounts for the other 98%? You guessed it: Abortion. Planned Parenthood performed 332,278 abortions in 2009 — in fact, Planned Parenthood is America’s largest abortion provider.

So for every adoption referral, Planned Parenthood performs 340 abortions. They don’t care about helping low-income pregnant women unless those low income women want an abortion!
40% of those killed were African Americans. Not only are we looking at genocide-we are looking at a Seante Majority leader who wants us to fund this genocide.
 
40% of those killed were African Americans. Not only are we looking at genocide-we are looking at a Seante Majority leader who wants us to fund this genocide.
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Unless you can back up your assertion that PP is deliberately and systematically intent on the destruction of the black population of the United States, your hyperbole is in error.
 
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Unless you can back up your assertion that PP is deliberately and systematically intent on the destruction of the black population of the United States, your hyperbole is in error.
So the slaughter of 400,000 black children a year does not meet your formal definition of genocide.? The children are just as dead whehter you want to call it genocide or not. Of course the difference is that PP gets paid to carry out this genocide-most perpetuators do it for free.
 
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Unless you can back up your assertion that PP is deliberately and systematically intent on the destruction of the black population of the United States, your hyperbole is in error.
Though they deny it, PP has never ceased to target the poor and disabled, Sanger’s favorite examples of the so-called “unfit.”

Watch Maafa 21 and then try to tell me that the “hyperbole” is in error.
 
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Unless you can back up your assertion that PP is deliberately and systematically intent on the destruction of the black population of the United States, your hyperbole is in error.
Then I suppose you would admit that there was no genocide of Native Americans by the Euorpeans?
 
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Unless you can back up your assertion that PP is deliberately and systematically intent on the destruction of the black population of the United States, your hyperbole is in error.
I am assuming you got this from Wikipedia. This is from the same page in which genocide is defined:

" Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

a) killing members of the group
b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
c)deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
d) imposing measures intended to prevent birth within the group**

So it wouldn’t seem to big a stretch to say that Planned Parenthood, with its racist eugenic origins and objectives, as well as Margaret Sanger’s continued status within the organization as someone who they look up to and emulate as a leader and visionary, could be looked at as a possible genocidal organization.

Ishii
 
I am assuming you got this from Wikipedia.
No. From Encarta World English Dictionary (on-line) and from hard copy Unabridged Webster’s New 20th Century Dictionary of the English Language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top