A
ac_claire
Guest
I’m not, lml. Smells like bait to me.Please tell me that none of you are buying into his “intuitive”hateful opinions as fact? Please?!?!?!
I’m not, lml. Smells like bait to me.Please tell me that none of you are buying into his “intuitive”hateful opinions as fact? Please?!?!?!
That barista Laura mentioned who refuses to serve customers who are on their phones is a start. People have to just stop tolerating the behavior; stop rewarding it in any way, IMO. Problem is not everyone will get on the boat with us; most probably won’t.How do you think this rudeness began and what can we do about it as individuals?![]()
This isn’t true.Absolution of venial sins, if you are contrite, is only available in the Traditional Mass. This absolution has been removed in the OF. This doesn’t mean that you can ignore confession. Penance is a sacrament and from it you will receive grace.
Originally Posted by stmaria
Absolution of venial sins, if you are contrite, is only available in the Traditional Mass. This absolution has been removed in the OF. This doesn’t mean that you can ignore confession. Penance is a sacrament and from it you will receive grace
Yes it is. It has always been true. I e-mailed my FSSP priest and he verified it.This isn’t true.
It is true that the prayer of absolution that is in the EF is not in the OF. But, that does not mean that there is no absolution of venial sins in the OF.This isn’t true.
This type pf thinking among “Conservatives”, is so shortsighhted, narrow and selfish. To care about only the “bare bones”, or just the legalistic aspect of the Mass, fails to take into account 1)our humanity which needs the Truths of the Faith symbolized and spoken n the Mass 2 )the sacred traditons of the saints who taught us through example and trial and error which developed into the “Tridentine Mass” and other Sacraments (including the Office, etc.) 3) The constant teaching of the Church who has always taught that it must “hold on to the traditions” passed on…I agree with SuscipeMeDomine.
Why would I want to talk to someone who thinks so negatively about any mass that I attend? I enjoy all styles of mass be it Latin mass, NO or the Anglican Use Mass. You can debate the styles all you want. But as my father told me “Jesus came to establish a Church not a Mass”. The truth is I go to mass not because of the style of mass but because my lord and savior has sacrificed himself for me and I am going to receive him into my body and soul. That’s what matters to me. Not your opinion of whither it’s the most correct or pure form of mass.
Could someone please show me where in the Cateschism it states that holy water and the Eucharist forgives venial sins., if one is contrite of course. I would like to have that reference handy. ThanksFor whatever reason Bugnini removed the 2nd prayer (the prayer of absolution) from the 1970 Roman Missal. But, as already pointed out, holy water removes venial sin. And receiving the Eucharist removes it as well. So, I do not think it is correct to say that the absolution of venial sins doesn’t occur in the OF. But, I do believe it is true that there is nor a specific prayer for absolution.
James
Jesus Christ came to establish a Church, yes… but He also established the Mass, when he celebrated the first Mass at the Last Supper.I agree with SuscipeMeDomine.
But as my father told me “Jesus came to establish a Church not a Mass”.
well here’s the Eucharist part:Could someone please show me where in the Cateschism it states that holy water and the Eucharist forgives venial sins., if one is contrite of course. I would like to have that reference handy. Thanks
1393 Holy Communion separates us from sin. The body of Christ we receive in Holy Communion is “given up for us,” and the blood we drink “shed for the many for the forgiveness of sins.” **For this reason the Eucharist cannot unite us to Christ without at the same time cleansing us from past sins and preserving us from future sins: **
1394 As bodily nourishment restores lost strength, so the Eucharist strengthens our charity, which tends to be weakened in daily life; and this living charity wipes away venial sins. By giving himself to us Christ revives our love and enables us to break our disordered attachments to creatures and root ourselves in him:
1395 **By the same charity that it enkindles in us, the Eucharist preserves us from future mortal sins. **The more we share the life of Christ and progress in his friendship, the more difficult it is to break away from him by mortal sin. The Eucharist is not ordered to the forgiveness of mortal sins - that is proper to the sacrament of Reconciliation. The Eucharist is properly the sacrament of those who are in full communion with the Church.
The pray Indulgentiam has been removed but that does not mean that the OF does not contain an absolution. As is evident from the GIRM, the Misereatur is an absolution. Although the Indulgentiam is more strongly worded, strictly speaking, in one sense, both are on the same footing since they are depreciative formulae. In the Traditional altar missal, the words “facit absolutionem” come before the Misereatur, not the Indulgentiam.Absolution of venial sins, if you are contrite, is only available in the Traditional Mass. This absolution has been removed in the OF. This doesn’t mean that you can ignore confession. Penance is a sacrament and from it you will receive grace.
Please define what you consider to be a Liberal, an Orthodox, and a Traditionalist Catholic.This forum has become infested with liberals here lately.
In my opinion, there are three general groups. Liberals, Orthodox, and Traditionalists. The Orthodox and Traditionalist don’t tend to go at it.
The problem is, some such threads are started off in the guise of “Subject: HOLY TRUE RED instead of happy clappy pinko.”If I were to go over to Litugy and Sacraments and start a thread titled RED, and the text of my post said simply, “what do you think”, I would be ignored or someone would ask what I meant.
If my text said " I’m a traditionalist and I say RED ! " I would be attacked with passion. Just because of the word traditionalist.
I’d be silly to do something like that wouldn’t I ? I’d be starting a baited thread.
How, pray tell?I’m not fool enough to think the debates won’t continue here, but the liberals are here among us. They are easy to spot.
Ooooh, sounds like a conspiracy.The Church’s definition of liberal, vs the average traditionalist definition ? You are right. They differ. For the time being![]()
Ordinary formThe pray Indulgentiam has been removed but that does not mean that the OF does not contain an absolution. As is evident from the GIRM, the Misereatur is an absolution. Although the Indulgentiam is more strongly worded, strictly speaking, in one sense, both are on the same footing since they are depreciative formulae. In the Traditional altar missal, the words “facit absolutionem” come before the Misereatur, not the Indulgentiam.
Baltimore Catechism #2 had this to say:Could someone please show me where in the Cateschism it states that holy water and the Eucharist forgives venial sins., if one is contrite of course. I would like to have that reference handy. Thanks
Thank you. This brings up another question. Why does the Catechism say "for many" and not "for all"well here’s the Eucharist part:
Yes of course…I was speaking in the context of the way you were using absolution with regard to venial sins and the OF having no absolution for venial sins. It does, as does the EF- the difference is that the EF has two formulae and the OF only one. The absolution within Mass is a sacramental not a sacrament.Ordinary form
“May almighty God have mercy on us, forgive us our sins, and bring us to everlasting life.” Ordinary Form
From the GIRM
The Act of Penitence
- Then the priest invites those present to take part in the Act of Penitence, which, after a brief pause for silence, the entire community carries out through a formula of general confession. The rite concludes with the priest’s absolution, which, however, **lacks the efficacy **of the Sacrament of Penance.
Baltimore Catechism #2 had this to say:
292. Q. What is a sacramental?
A. A sacramental is anything set apart or blessed by the Church to excite good thoughts and to increase devotion, and through these movements of the heart to remit venial sin.
301. Q. What is holy water?
A. Holy water is water blessed by the priest with solemn prayer to beg God’s blessing on those who use it, and protection from the powers of darkness.
And Baltimore Catechism #3 said:
Thanks James, I will go with the Baltimore Catechism on this one**Q. 1054. Do the Sacramentals of themselves remit venial sins?
**
“For many” is correct. “For all” was a poor translation from the Latin. Pope Benedict has ordered this changed with the rest of the new English language translation that is being prepared.Thank you. This brings up another question. Why does the Catechism say "for many" and not "for all"
But **the prayer **in the TLM gives absolution if one is contrite.Yes of course…I was speaking in the context of the way you were using absolution with regard to venial sins and the OF having no absolution for venial sins. It does, as does the EF- the absolution within Mass is a sacramental not a sacrament.
Right, it lacks the efficacy of Confession to absolve mortal sin. Doesn’t say or mean that it no longer absolves venial sin.
- Then the priest invites those present to take part in the Act of Penitence, which, after a brief pause for silence, the entire community carries out through a formula of general confession. The rite concludes with the priest’s absolution, which, however, **lacks the efficacy **of the Sacrament of Penance.
It does not remove venial sins. This absoultion was removed. Also the Penitential Rite A is optional. It is often skipped completely and Option B or C is used.Right, it lacks the efficacy of Confession to absolve mortal sin. Doesn’t say or mean that it no longer absolves venial sin.