O
onenow1
Guest
What does that have to do with the quality and truth of the documentary movie.Is that the one where Dinesh has an extramarital affair and then is convicted of campaign fraud?
God Bless
onenow1
What does that have to do with the quality and truth of the documentary movie.Is that the one where Dinesh has an extramarital affair and then is convicted of campaign fraud?
I believe he was pointing out history as it really was from Alexander to Obama; And as Jesus said he who is without sin cast the first stone.Dinesh claims that Obama is ruining America with bad politics and then goes and commits campaign fraud. He says that atheists don’t want to abide by christian teachings because there are too many sexual prohibitions (adultery being one that he mentions by name), then cheats on his fiance.
Normally, I couldn’t care less if he’s going to prison for campaign fraud or cheats on his fiance with someone else’s spouse. But when he tries to claim the moral high ground and point out those flaws in others, it just makes him look like a hypocrite. It doesn’t seem like his christian morals are really making him a better person. They’re just another stone to cast.
What does that have to do with the quality and truth of the documentary movie.
God Bless
onenow1![]()
Great minds think alike.Will look forward to your opinion of the movie. Maybe you should start with the book first.
Great minds think alike.…I’m just now searching his works.
John
I was just looking at his book on suffering on Google Books. Naturally, it only allows for small portions of the book, but I can already say this. He has a pleasant writing style that is easy to follow. That should make this a pleasant exploration.the book should show his sources.
He has a pleasant way of speaking when narrating the movie also.I was just looking at his book on suffering on Google Books. Naturally, it only allows for small portions of the book, but I can already say this. He has a pleasant writing style that is easy to follow. That should make this a pleasant exploration.
As a undergraduate student in history I totally agree with you.As a professional historian, I believe that one of the best ways to look at a work of history is to look at its sources. Is the author truly analyzing history or just placing his own ideas on paper. Naturally, all historians eventually have to draw conclusions from the available sources, but it must start at a neutral position and follow where the sources lead.
I have not seen the works in question, but intend to. If the sources are good, I will respect the effort, even if I disagree with the conclusions. On the other hand, if any author of history begins with a conclusion and then cherry-picks the sources, or uses none at all, I have no respect for their work.
Does this apply to Dinesh as well?…And as Jesus said he who is without sin cast the first stone.
.Does this apply to Dinesh as well?
Dinesh has a right to criticize Obama, just like I have a right to criticize him. The weight of his criticism is diminished for me, though, due to the fact that he is willing to lie and break the law for his own ends..
So, you don’t believe that D’Souza has the right to criticize Obama and other radical progressives because he has sinned? Every person has the right to speak, AND tell the truth, as D’Souza has. Implementation of your interpretation of Jesus’ words would paralyze the body politic from speaking out against evil of every kind. :ehh:
And where,pray tell have you read of the documentary?Dinesh has a right to criticize Obama, just like I have a right to criticize him. The weight of his criticism is diminished for me, though, due to the fact that he is willing to lie and break the law for his own ends.
From what I have read of the documentary itself, (and no I haven’t seen it yet - I’m waiting for it to wash up on Netflix in a few months) it sounds like a lot of speculation on the part of Dinesh. It’s a political piece, targeted to a specific demographic, telling them what they want to hear. It’s a right wing version of a Michael Moore film. These types of films don’t tend to carry much water.
Your criticisms are generic now, in contrast to your earlier ad hominem attack. Dinesh takes words right from the horses’ mouths, and he gives them plenty of rope with which to make their case, or in some instances, hang themselves.Dinesh has a right to criticize Obama, just like I have a right to criticize him. The weight of his criticism is diminished for me, though, due to the fact that he is willing to lie and break the law for his own ends.
From what I have read of the documentary itself, (and no I haven’t seen it yet - I’m waiting for it to wash up on Netflix in a few months) it sounds like a lot of speculation on the part of Dinesh. It’s a political piece, targeted to a specific demographic, telling them what they want to hear. It’s a right wing version of a Michael Moore film. These types of films don’t tend to carry much water.