R
Rence
Guest
Better, without a doubt. For all the reasons I’ve mentioned in my previous postsSo, have things gotten better or worse–in general?
Better, without a doubt. For all the reasons I’ve mentioned in my previous postsSo, have things gotten better or worse–in general?
Much better, because they can choose their jobs instead of being forced into a job that they can only do because they have no other skills and/or education, or because of outside pressures that tell them they can’t do something because they are merely female. Committing to an education, and being able to choose the career, sets an example for your children to follow. This has improved our culture.So, would you say that our culture has improved, gotten worse, or had no (name removed by moderator)act as a result of women entering the workfoce at easily 90% or higher rates?
That really is my basic question. Have things gotten worse, better or remained the same?
The situation would be no different than when a woman decides with her husband if they can afford her to be at home to run the fort, or if she needs to help him by working. If the woman who works isn’t able to afford to make enough money to maintain the household, he would have to get a job and work until she is able to do so. Neither party today decides independently that they want to live a lesser lifestyle and stay home. So if men went full circle and wanted to stay home in large numbers, they would still have to decide together if they could afford to do that.I would very much like to know the views from women about my flip-it scenario:
What if men went full circle and wanted to stay home in large numbers. Say those same men were perfectly willing to live with a lesser lifestyle, and that they really just wanted to be with their kids and wanted to help form then, teach them and care for them until adulthood. Basically in this scenario the majority of men would remove themselves from fulltime employment and leave that task to the wives and women in general.
Personally, I wouldn’t mind one bit. Then women would be the doctors, lawers, teachers, senators, and house representatives, and men could stay home and run the fort. In my home situtation, I would much rather go to work and leave the household chores like laundry, vacuuming, etc. to someone else. Then when I come home, I get to spend time with kids, animals, and pick up loose ends. So if I got married, and my hubby wanted to run the household, he can have that jobWould that be a good thing or bad thing for our families and children? Would it be good or bad for the nation and our culture? How would women, in general, react to such a huge change?
A very wise response. You are more educated about human nature than you thinkWow, what a controversial subject!
I am one of those women who would’ve preferred to live when it was normal to be a stay at home mommy and just be a homemaker with a loving husband…
I feel like motherhood is stigmatized almost because I’m expected to be feminist.
I would hate to supress another woman’s right to pursue her happiness just because this is what i want. And I would hate to have my pursuit of happiness done away with because of radical feminists.
I do believe a stay at home parent makes a difference in a child’s life. Good or bad depending on the parent!
I don’t have much else to say, I’m not educated enough to have a fully formed opinion on this subject.
Just a curious agnostic…
Great post, but I bolded one part that I slightly disagree with. I too can go to all of my kids’ games. I too can be home when they are done with school. I too don’t have to worry about snow days, teacher workshops or school delays.I did both. I worked when the kids were younger. I have 4 kids. I was an engineer but was able to work part time. It was tough with a husband that traveled all the time. I had deadlines at work that needed to be met and it was difficult completing everything on 20 hours a week. I was often given as much work as the full time employees. Even on my days off, I would get phone calls at home. I felt like I was being pulled in two directions.
I eventually quit my job and focused on the kids. What a blessing. I have a son with sensory issues and ADHD. He needed constant attention and even needed to be homeschooled at one point. I was able to help him learn how to succeed in life. It was not unusually to get phone calls from multiple teachers in one day. Now he is in high school and doing great.
I love that I can go to my kids games. That I am home when they get home from school. I never have to worry about snow days, teacher workshops or school delays. Life is so much easier not working.
There are negatives. I haven’t worked in 8 years. How do I get back into the job market now? What if I wanted to leave my husband, how would I support myself and my children? I often feel trapped. By giving up my job, I became dependent on a man. I prefer to rely only on myself.
I do believe that Warrenton is a man, a sexist and has no children of his own. I could be wrong, but the attitudes of this person are very sexist against women specifically.At first I thought this post was sarcasm, but then I realized it wasn’t. Where to begin?
First of all, why do you assume a working mother has to leave her children with strangers? DOn’t you think mothers take the time to get to know their children’s caregivers?? Do you also not understand the strong bond that occurs between caregiver and child? And, finally, why do you think caregivers are raising these children? Are they deciding their schools? Where they attend church?
Teach who what? Caregivers don’t teach?
What I find sad is that so many women are taught to feel like they cannot feel happiness being a stay-at-home mom. From my limited “male” point of view, I just cannot think of any blessing humans receive that is greater than childbirth and being a mother. Yet, today motherhood simply is not held to a high esteem at all…it is just another “choice” among many. I find it all very sad.Wow, what a controversial subject!
I am one of those women who would’ve preferred to live when it was normal to be a stay at home mommy and just be a homemaker with a loving husband…
I feel like motherhood is stigmatized almost because I’m expected to be feminist.
I would hate to supress another woman’s right to pursue her happiness just because this is what i want. And I would hate to have my pursuit of happiness done away with because of radical feminists.
I do believe a stay at home parent makes a difference in a child’s life. Good or bad depending on the parent!
I don’t have much else to say, I’m not educated enough to have a fully formed opinion on this subject.
Just a curious agnostic…
What I find sad is that so many women are taught to feel like they cannot feel happiness being a stay-at-home mom. From my limited “male” point of view, I just cannot think of any blessing humans receive that is greater than childbirth and being a mother. Yet, today motherhood simply is not held to a high esteem at all…it is just another “choice” among many. I find it all very sad.
You know, men are blessed with the Priesthood (albeit in very tiny percentages) and through the Priesthood the Grace and Salvation of Christ comes into the world, yet that would do little good if there were no mothers, because without sound mothers there would be no-one to receive the gifts the Priests bring to us through Christ!
The greatest human that ever lived (other than Jesus of course) was Mary our Lord’s Mother!
May the good Lord Bless all Mothers (and Fathers), and may the Lord show them just how blessed they really are to be Mothers. Amen!
**]**
I agree with you to a point, but a very high percentage of mothers in the 1950s were prescribed valium to deal with their unhappiness as a SAHM with an absent husband and father to her children.
I don’t think that many women were truly happy being a SAHM simply b/c they felt trapped and pigeon holed into this role by society.
Backtrack to the 1800s, women had many more responsibilities and did work fulltime for a living. This work may have been centred around the home (farm work, dressmaking, etc.), but they had a focus.
SAHM women in the 1950s didn’t have the same responsibilities…they simply became bored and unhappy with all of their automated appliances.
Without evidence, I find it to be scandoulsy unfair to claim “very high percentages” of 19050s moms used drugs to get by. Please provide proof if there is any.I agree with you to a point, but a very high percentage of mothers in the 1950s were prescribed valium to deal with their unhappiness as a SAHM with an absent husband and father to her children.
I don’t think that many women were truly happy being a SAHM simply b/c they felt trapped and pigeon holed into this role by society.
Backtrack to the 1800s, women had many more responsibilities and did work fulltime for a living. This work may have been centred around the home (farm work, dressmaking, etc.), but they had a focus.
SAHM women in the 1950s didn’t have the same responsibilities…they simply became bored and unhappy with all of their automated appliances.
I think your perspective is just a little limited.What I find sad is that so many women are taught to feel like they cannot feel happiness being a stay-at-home mom. From my limited “male” point of view, I just cannot think of any blessing humans receive that is greater than childbirth and being a mother. Yet, today motherhood simply is not held to a high esteem at all…it is just another “choice” among many. I find it all very sad.![]()
Probably from most of the people he knows. I have the same impression, and the current morality or lack of it are pretty strong evidence.Where are you getting your impression?![]()
I think it’s great that you esteem the work of a stay-at-home mom, and I wish that more people appreciated it as a vocation. Women who do this are often seen as not doing something “of value”- but then again, women who go to work outside the home are sometimes seen as “neglectful”.What I find sad is that so many women are taught to feel like they cannot feel happiness being a stay-at-home mom. From my limited “male” point of view, I just cannot think of any blessing humans receive that is greater than childbirth and being a mother. Yet, today motherhood simply is not held to a high esteem at all…it is just another “choice” among many. I find it all very sad.
Those were the issues I had when I worked. Because I live in a small town, my commute was an hour each way. I wasted 2 hours in just travel time. I was working 10 hours days so that I only went to work two days a week. It was tough. I was changing days based on snow, teacher work shops, sick kids and my husband’s travel schedule. Which could be difficult for my co-workers and boss. I worked on classified projects so I could not take work home. The middle school and high school games can be as early as 3PM. It would tough to make them if they fell on work days. Plus, all the camps my kids go to in the summer. Arranging car pools would be a nightmare. Having 4 kids, all heavily involved in sports just makes for crazy schedules. And my kids do not go to school in the town we live in.Great post, but I bolded one part that I slightly disagree with. I too can go to all of my kids’ games. I too can be home when they are done with school. I too don’t have to worry about snow days, teacher workshops or school delays.
Don’t assume that b/c a mother is working, she cannot do all of these things also. I work in a very flexible environment and have 22 days off each year, so I can book days off to be fully involved with my kids.
Cviolete, for what it is worth, you are highly educated and I think you could start working on a certificate at one of the universities in your area, to upgrade your skills (as an engineer). I’ve seen it done and it’s very doable. In Canada, we have a designation called P. Eng. You need to be working to get it, so after your certificate, you could see if there is a designation like that in your area.
Here you go.Without evidence, I find it to be scandoulsy unfair to claim “very high percentages” of 19050s moms used drugs to get by. Please provide proof if there is any.
Beyond that, nothing I posted is wrong. Please, name on blessing that humans have that goes beyond motherhood???![]()
Are you male or female?
The first link does not point to any evidence that valium was used specifically for mothers, it just points to its use, and its use was mainly in the 60s and 70s, not in the 50s as you stated earlier. Drugs were heavily used in many forms in the 60s and 70s (legal and illegal), so no surprise there.Here you go.
benzo.org.uk/aus1.htm
richardbrenneman.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/stunning-news-about-%E2%80%98mother%E2%80%99s-little-helpers%E2%80%99/
I have never said anything about whether or not motherhood is a huge blessing. I do believe that motherhood is a HUGE blessing and so is fatherhood.
At first I thought this post was sarcasm, but then I realized it wasn’t. Where to begin?
First of all, why do you assume a working mother has to leave her children with strangers?
What I find sad is that so many women are taught to feel like they cannot feel happiness being a stay-at-home mom. From my limited “male” point of view, I just cannot think of any blessing humans receive that is greater than childbirth and being a mother. Yet, today motherhood simply is not held to a high esteem at all…it is just another “choice” among many. I find it all very sad.
QUOTE]
Do you also feel that way about fatherhood? Because I believe that it is sad that so many men are taught to feel like they can’t find happiness being a stay-at-home dad…moreso than for a mom where it’s still more common.