T
TheDoors
Guest
His mercy endures forever!
All the time. Every time. But we all fall short of the glory of God.
All the time. Every time. But we all fall short of the glory of God.
YEP! A very common occurence…WHY?=joclucsylv;7816412]Yes, I admit it. Some of my sins are really embarassing to confess. Does anyone else feel like I do?
Not embarrassed, no. But terrified, yeah. Just the first time.Yes, I admit it. Some of my sins are really embarassing to confess. Does anyone else feel like I do?
That doesn’t seem to be an appropriate response to a confession.Has anyone gone to confession feeling their weight of sin upon them to be told they have no sin?
I remember once going, confessing sins that I found quite troubling to be told by the priest I had no sins, that I only wanted a social outlet, and to meet him tomorrow at the presbytery.
Well I can tell you with most certainty that following a strange God is first and foremost although forgivable, it is a grave sin. Also, the church strictly prohibits all three of your examples. If you’re getting “mixed signals” in these areas, you’re being led astray. Don’t allow that kind of balogne to be propagated.Sheadad
No, I don’t think so either, I left more troubled than the state in which I had arrived. Did I meet up with the priest afterward? No.
It stopped me from returning to the confessional for quite a while, I felt I was wasting everyone’s time. The experience was embarrassing.
It’s difficult to know what to confess, nowadays what is considered a sin seems a very grey area. I’ve confessed to leaving the Catholic Faith to follow “strange gods” to be told that is not a sin:shrug:
I don’t want to go off at a tangent but Catholic ethics since Vatican 2 appears to have gone into relativism - all things that were once considered sin appear to be questionable, e.g. abortion, contraception, sex before marriage.
There are far more laity in the world than religious, so this statistic, if true, wouldn’t surprise me. I have a hunch, though, that religious comprise a greater percentage of saints than of the general population.There have been more saints made of the laity than of the Religious.
Even if the priest doesn’t think your sins are as grave as you do, if he absolves you, you are absolved. You don’t need to continue to give the same confession until you get a priest who is “hard” on you.Maybe it takes a while to find a “competent” priest.
In the same way as it does to find a competent doctor - they may have the calling, may have passed the appropriate exams but application may be far from adequate.
(I hear some place one can “interview” and read reviews on a priest.)
It occurs to me that St John of the Cross wrote his books because (even then) expert spiritual directors were very few and far between.
There have been more saints made of the laity than of the Religious.
Should one constantly and continually be going to confession until one gets the answers one wants? Or expects?
I think it’s often a matter of misguided compassion. Priests want to make sinners feel better, but unfortunately, some think they way to do this is to tell them they aren’t really sinners. Some are so worried about being too hard on sinners that they end up being to squishy. Unfortunately, without some pushing, this allows the sinners to be complacent in their sinfulness, and makes them wonder why they need the Church at all if they can be “basically good people” without her.I don’t want to go off at a tangent but Catholic ethics since Vatican 2 appears to have gone into relativism - all things that were once considered sin appear to be questionable, e.g. abortion, contraception, sex before marriage.
Absolutely correct, but what if the priest tells you that something wasn’t a sin, and therefore doesn’t offer absolution for it? (That’s not a rhetorical question – I’m honestly not sure.)Even if the priest doesn’t think your sins are as grave as you do, if he absolves you, you are absolved. You don’t need to continue to give the same confession until you get a priest who is “hard” on you.