Head of Vatican's Highest Court: Ministers Have "Obligation to Deny" Communion to Pro-Abortion Politicians

  • Thread starter Thread starter childofmary1143
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You second statement is contradicted by the new prefect of the Apostolic Signatura (basically the Supreme Court of canon law.)

"While the judgment regarding the disposition of the individual who presents himself to receive Holy Communion belongs to the minister of the Sacrament, the question regarding the objective state of Catholic politicians who knowingly and willingly hold opinions contrary to the natural moral law would hardly seem to change from place to place."

Archbishop Burke
The Discipline Regarding the Denial of Holy Communion to Those Obstinately Persevering in Manifest Grave Sin
Periodica de re Canonica, 2007

Ender
I’m not sure of the context this was written under, but if EMHC’s take this litterally, we will have sacramental anarchy, as EMHC’s beging to deny communion from people who they have judged to be not well disposed, i.e. single mothers, alcoholics etc.

Jim
 
I’m not sure of the context this was written under, but if EMHC’s take this litterally, we will have sacramental anarchy, as EMHC’s beging to deny communion from people who they have judged to be not well disposed, i.e. single mothers, alcoholics etc.

Jim
I don’t think there any circumstances that EHMC should deny anyone the communion. I agree this could lead to anarchy.
 
I don’t think there any circumstances that EHMC should deny anyone the communion. I agree this could lead to anarchy.
I guarantee you that if an EMHC denied communion without their priest’s instruction it would be their first and last time unless they had very, very good reason to. For example, not being clear whether someone is Catholic based on the way they present themselves.

There was a strange woman in our parish who when I held up Our Lord and said “the Body of Christ” didn’t say a word and looked off into space, so I didn’t place Him in her hands, until my priest said “go ahead and give it to her.” She said “Amen” afterwards. We never discussed it , but I’m assuming he knew that she was able to receive…I certainly had no idea. There are a few others who don’t say “Amen,” but I knew they were Catholics (I was there for their First Communion and/or they were elderly “regulars” in the front pews who receive on their tongues).

Our new priest had to actually make a comment to the parish reminding that we are to say “Amen.” He said “be Catholics.” 😛 One of our visiting priests from Uganda said they are very strict about not giving the Eucharist to someone who doesn’t present themselves.
 
I guarantee you that if an EMHC denied communion without their priest’s instruction it would be their first and last time unless they had very, very good reason to. For example, not being clear whether someone is Catholic based on the way they present themselves.

There was a strange woman in our parish who when I held up Our Lord and said “the Body of Christ” didn’t say a word and looked off into space, so I didn’t place Him in her hands, until my priest said “go ahead and give it to her.” She said “Amen” afterwards. We never discussed it , but I’m assuming he knew that she was able to receive…I certainly had no idea. There are a few others who don’t say “Amen,” but I knew they were Catholics (I was there for their First Communion and/or they were elderly “regulars” in the front pews who receive on their tongues).

Our new priest had to actually make a comment to the parish reminding that we are to say “Amen.” He said “be Catholics.” 😛 One of our visiting priests from Uganda said they are very strict about not giving the Eucharist to someone who doesn’t present themselves.
Look IMHO if there is no way for the EMHCs to control whom they are giving our Lord to then maybe we need to rethink the use of EMHCs. If the only thing they can do is “give” to anyone that come forward then there is no control over the communion.
 
Look IMHO if there is no way for the EMHCs to control whom they are giving our Lord to then maybe we need to rethink the use of EMHCs. If the only thing they can do is “give” to anyone that come forward then there is no control over the communion.
I agree with you. In fact, I agonized over accepting the request from my priest to be an EMHC, since I believe they are overused. Note in my response, I said “without their priest’s instruction” or “unless they had a very, very good reason.”

My point is simple. If my priest said, “as you know, Mayor so-and-so is pro-choice. I’ve spoken with him about it and he insists on holding and proclaiming this view in defiance of the Church, so if he presents himself you should not give him Our Lord,” then I would not. If someone appears bewildered when they present themselves, I will not give them Our Lord, unless my priest speaks up and tells me to, as he did in the case I cited. I haven’t had any other instances where I know someone is in a state of mortal sin.

Now, I have it pretty easy at my parish, as there is only me and the priest (and two EMHCs with the blood - one on each side of the church). In larger parishes, I don’t know what they do.
 
Look IMHO if there is no way for the EMHCs to control whom they are giving our Lord to then maybe we need to rethink the use of EMHCs. If the only thing they can do is “give” to anyone that come forward then there is no control over the communion.
Truth of the matter is that even the Priest has almost no contro;lover who they are giving communion to.
 
FIX
Code:
 You seem to suggest that individual believers should not think for themselves. I don't claim to be any special authority, but I have been given a brain and am quite convinced that God wants me to use it. Now, if my conscience leads me to disagree with the church I presume you think I should ignore that conscience and submit to 'churchly authority'.  Fewer and fewer of us are ready to do that in 2008 AD.  We have been taught to think for ourselves, and we have been influenced by the democratic spirit of America and prize our freedom of religion. 

   My own view is that we can disagree among ourselves and still live together, worship together, and be devoted to the one God. This notion that we must echo the position of the church is totalitarian, and I reject it. I assume you believe that Catholics who insist on thinking for themselves have no place in the church. I read the column of Fr. McBrien of Notre Dame each week and I rather think he agrees with me (or vice versa). I also find support in Commonweal and other Catholic publications. Catholic Answers seems to attract the more doctrinaire, less tolerant Catholics, Most Catholics I know think like I do. Many have lost confidence in the church altogether. They continue to attend Mass for family or cultural reasons, perhaps because of a likeable priest - or they have stopped going to mass entirely.
 
Truth of the matter is that even the Priest has almost no contro;lover who they are giving communion to.
This is true. But, in the case of politicians in their own parish, they do know who they are and they are familiar with their public stances. If they have counseled them, and they are persistent in their public sin, then the priest would be correct in denying them Communion and instructing his EMHCs to do the same.
 
I thought this thread started with the discussion of PUBLIC representatives, such as Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry etc. who support abortion? . I don’t believe communion could be forbidden a private citizen.
 
I’d be satisfied if Archbishop Wuerl of DC accepted and enforced it but I see no reason for optimism on that score.

Ender
Didn’t Wuerl make a recent statement about this that was in accord with what Burke said?
 
I’d be satisfied if Archbishop Wuerl of DC accepted and enforced it but I see no reason for optimism on that score.

Ender
How would one know if the person presenting themselves for Communion didn’t go to Confession the night before?
We are talking about PUBLIC representatives who have PUBLICALLY endorsed abortion. These people would have to recant PUBLICALLY.
 
I’m glad to see the RCC has people with the courage to stand up for the Church’s teachings regarding the sanctity of life.👍

Catholics: does it bother you at all to see Protestants who are more in-line with RCC teachings than many of your fellow Catholics? Just curious.
Doesn’t bother me at all. More power to them.👍 Shame on those Catholics who don’t believe and think as Catholics.😦
 
I’m glad to see the RCC has people with the courage to stand up for the Church’s teachings regarding the sanctity of life.👍

Catholics: does it bother you at all to see Protestants who are more in-line with RCC teachings than many of your fellow Catholics? Just curious.
No, I’m opposed to abortion, but that decision is also not as simple as many think it is.

I have seen where a woman, wanting to have her baby, but due to complications, was forced to decide between her own life, or inducing labor, which would result in the immediate death of the baby, who would not a survive full term pregnancy anyway. Should this decision be made by a government bureaucrat, or herself and her doctor?

I think its a no brainer. The decision is should be up to herself and her doctor, and keep the government out of it.

Jim
I do hope she consulted a priest on the very problematical decision.
 
You, myself and the Catholic Church, understand that killing an unborn child for convenience, is immoral.

However, we don’t live under the rules of the Catholic Church,(thank God), nor are we in the majority on this issue, unfortunately. Even the Jewish religion, isn’t in agreement on abortion being imoral in every case.

This is why, the only way to move ahead is to educate people.

I can tell people abortion is wrong, but unless they come to see it and believe it, they’re not going to change. They’re certainly not changing because the Catholic Church says its so.

Jim
In order to educate people you first have to get their attention. If the clergy here in the U.S. support Archbishop Burke, I think they will be able to make use of a great two x four.
 
You, myself and the Catholic Church, understand that killing an unborn child for convenience, is immoral.

However, we don’t live under the rules of the Catholic Church,(thank God), nor are we in the majority on this issue, unfortunately. Even the Jewish religion, isn’t in agreement on abortion being imoral in every case.

This is why, the only way to move ahead is to educate people.

I can tell people abortion is wrong, but unless they come to see it and believe it, they’re not going to change. They’re certainly not changing because the Catholic Church says its so.

Jim
The local Bishop.

In fact, the local Bishop should meet with the politician, to get all the facts, before banning them from Holy Communion.

That has not happened, as far as I know.

BTW, I think its important, that when you see what is called anti-abortion legislation, to read the bill, and see if it targets specific kinds of abortion, or is it written so vaguely, that it would include induced labor, done out of medical necessity.

I think you will see that many in the GOP, are playing games with this issue, and do not have any intention of putting the government in the way of abortion. In fact, some Republicans who have voted in favor of anti-abortion bills, which never passed, have also made public statements, that they would never vote to have Roe V Wade overturned. It seems that they voted for the legislation, out of political expediency, knowing it would not pass anyway. These people are not as pro-life as you liked to believe they are.

Jim
Jim, personally I believe your personal experience you had as the Grandfather of a baby deemed unable to live has perhaps colored your stance on abortion. I do not judge you, only sympathize with your heartache. Sometimes decisions must be made that will leave a hole in our souls throughout our lives. I wish you and your family the best.
 
But the Bishops are the leaders and teachers of dogma. When their moral credibility is damaged, then their ability to teach is weakened.

Have no doubt about it. The sex abuse scandal had damaged the Catholic Church greatly, and it will take generations to heal.

The sad part is, from one of the most recent threads posted in here, we’re not past it yet.

Jim
I know this is off the trail, but would like some answers to the following:

I agree the way the sex scandal was handled by the Church left much to be desired. With this in mind, I have a couple of questions.
  1. Why were the guilty priests not sent to jail?
  2. Is it the “separation” of church from state that prevented this?
This makes me think of the history between Henry VIII and Thomas More. The scandals within the clergy then had to do with $$$$ I think. The argument between the two was this:

Henry wanted a dual punishment for those in the clergy who had been found guilty of whatever misdemeanor was committed. ie. He wanted these men banned from their duties as priests and he also wanted to be able to punish them with jail.
Thomas More said No, the disrobed priests had already been punished and needed no more punishment.

I don’t know how this ended, but in the end Thomas More was killed for his stance.

Now, the Catholic Church of Rome didn’t even disrobe the pedophile priests, or those who supported them by moving them from diocese to diocese. No wonder the church is in the shadows these days. Any explanations available?
 
But the Bishops are the leaders and teachers of dogma. When their moral credibility is damaged, then their ability to teach is weakened.

Have no doubt about it. The sex abuse scandal had damaged the Catholic Church greatly, and it will take generations to heal.

The sad part is, from one of the most recent threads posted in here, we’re not past it yet.

Jim
FIX
Code:
 You seem to suggest that individual believers should not think for themselves. I don't claim to be any special authority, but I have been given a brain and am quite convinced that God wants me to use it. Now, if my conscience leads me to disagree with the church I presume you think I should ignore that conscience and submit to 'churchly authority'.  Fewer and fewer of us are ready to do that in 2008 AD.  We have been taught to think for ourselves, and we have been influenced by the democratic spirit of America and prize our freedom of religion. 

   My own view is that we can disagree among ourselves and still live together, worship together, and be devoted to the one God. This notion that we must echo the position of the church is totalitarian, and I reject it. I assume you believe that Catholics who insist on thinking for themselves have no place in the church. I read the column of Fr. McBrien of Notre Dame each week and I rather think he agrees with me (or vice versa). I also find support in Commonweal and other Catholic publications. Catholic Answers seems to attract the more doctrinaire, less tolerant Catholics, Most Catholics I know think like I do. Many have lost confidence in the church altogether. They continue to attend Mass for family or cultural reasons, perhaps because of a likeable priest - or they have stopped going to mass entirely.
If one is to “think” for s/himself, then one needs to know all the facts and then make one’s mind up as to what they believe is true, or false. Not to be a smarty, but since you are Protestant, I wouldn’t think you have all the knowledge about the Catholic Church you would need to make a rational decision. All of us need to educate ourselves, not from listening to friends, reading propaganda, but from reading and listening to reliable sources. There is so much to learn about the Catholic Churchl, it takes some of the magisterium in Rome a life time to study just one issue. Those Catholics who have become wishy washy about the Catholic Church apparently have not availed themselves of all the truths about the Church.

I too, was very lazy, trying to build my beliefs and disbeliefs on teachings I had learned in Grade School. Now as a Gma. I am finally educating myself and have turned around 180 degrees, from falling from the boat and floundering by myself, to heading for a distant shore where there is support and many things about the Church have become crystal clear.
 
FIX

You seem to suggest that individual believers should not think for themselves. I don’t claim to be any special authority, but I have been given a brain and am quite convinced that God wants me to use it. Now, if my conscience leads me to disagree with the church I presume you think I should ignore that conscience and submit to ‘churchly authority’. Fewer and fewer of us are ready to do that in 2008 AD. We have been taught to think for ourselves, and we have been influenced by the democratic spirit of America and prize our freedom of religion.

My own view is that we can disagree among ourselves and still live together, worship together, and be devoted to the one God. This notion that we must echo the position of the church is totalitarian, and I reject it. I assume you believe that Catholics who insist on thinking for themselves have no place in the church. I read the column of Fr. McBrien of Notre Dame each week and I rather think he agrees with me (or vice versa). I also find support in Commonweal and other Catholic publications. Catholic Answers seems to attract the more doctrinaire, less tolerant Catholics, Most Catholics I know think like I do. Many have lost confidence in the church altogether. They continue to attend Mass for family or cultural reasons, perhaps because of a likeable priest - or they have stopped going to mass entirely.
Way off topic. Please start another thread and quit trying to derail this one.
 
FIX
Code:
 You seem to suggest that individual believers should not think for themselves. I don't claim to be any special authority, but I have been given a brain and am quite convinced that God wants me to use it. Now, if my conscience leads me to disagree with the church I presume you think I should ignore that conscience and submit to 'churchly authority'.  Fewer and fewer of us are ready to do that in 2008 AD.  We have been taught to think for ourselves, and we have been influenced by the democratic spirit of America and prize our freedom of religion. 

   My own view is that we can disagree among ourselves and still live together, worship together, and be devoted to the one God. This notion that we must echo the position of the church is totalitarian, and I reject it. I assume you believe that Catholics who insist on thinking for themselves have no place in the church. I read the column of Fr. McBrien of Notre Dame each week and I rather think he agrees with me (or vice versa). I also find support in Commonweal and other Catholic publications. Catholic Answers seems to attract the more doctrinaire, less tolerant Catholics, Most Catholics I know think like I do. Many have lost confidence in the church altogether. They continue to attend Mass for family or cultural reasons, perhaps because of a likeable priest - or they have stopped going to mass entirely.
This is a reply of protestant relativism. This is not what the True Church teaches.
Prayers and blessings
Deacon Ed B
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top