U
Usagi
Guest
Thanks, but I was actually disagreeing with you.Well said.
Thanks, but I was actually disagreeing with you.Well said.
Already explainedā¦As far as āThere will be no changing of minds or wills in eternity becaused the blessed will not want to, nor will the reprobate want toā, how do you āknowā?
I have no problem with people disagreeing with me.Thanks, but I was actually disagreeing with you.![]()
Iām sorry if I didnāt make it clear, but yes, it is immediate and irrevocable at the point of death.Yesā¦thatās all fine. Especially since it doesnāt imply that this is immediate and irrevocable at the point of physical earthly death, as some have implied. Thatās what I had an issue with.
Ja!The Catholic Church teaches that we cannot know what a soulās judgment at death might be, not that we do not know when it occurs.
It is Catholic dogma that a soul dying in unrepentant mortal sin is damned for eternity. The hope for an empty hell is based on the belief that God extends to every soul the grace necessary to repent before that happens and the hope that no one refuses that grace. It is not based on turning Hell into a second Purgatory where you can get out after awhile.
So, yes, if Blessed John Paul II hoped for an empty hell, he hoped that no one truly passed beyond death without repenting. Which is certainly possible and within Godās power, but by no means certain.
Usagi
Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth. Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear. The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repulsive likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent. This vision lasted but an instant. How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to heaven. Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.[5]Do you think that Jesus merely went to the āabode of the deadā (the good dead is how some seem to think of the abode of the dead) or to hell?
Something to think about: If Jesus took everyoneās sin upon Himself on the cross and as it is written that He āpaid the ransomā, wouldnāt ādescended into hellā mean exactly what it seems to say?
God did more than some seem to think God even capable of doing or even wanting to do for His Creation, sometimes the more that we ātry to explain all of the detailsā the āsmallerā that we make God.
God cares for ALL, maybe the lest that we can do, is to pray for ALL.
By the way, the analogy in the bible about hell being āsheolā is quite appropriate since it is the garbage dump and hell is āexperiencingā our āgarbage and the ramifications of our garbageā, in other words, we built our own hell and send ourself there.
God āwonā the keys to the netherworld (hell and spiritual death) and as He told us the āmissionā of His Church is that, āthe gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against Itā
Do you know what double-predestination is?Amandil
You wrote, āThe Catholic Church teaches predestination.What the Catholic Church doesnāt teach and rejects is double predestination(Calvinism).ā
No.Are you saying that the Catholic Church teaches that God is only partly Omniscient?
Predestination does not mean that āGod slung some here and some thereā. God doesnāt āslungā people anywhere.āPredestinationā to me means that God knows peopleās ādestinationā not that God slung some here and some there, are you saying that God knows the destination of some and not others?
Youāre confusing Redemption with Salvation, which a common protestant mistake. The Father forgives us through the covenant between Him and Jesus grounded in Christās sacrifice.You also wrote, āGod extends mercy to us here on earth because as Christ said on the cross, āFather, forgive them, for they know not what they do.ā Godās mercy is for us because we were deceived in our ignorance.ā
Did you ever notice that when Jesus said āthemā in āFather, forgive themā¦ā, that there is no asterisk after them?
Ever thought that this āthemā could be all of us and not just those physically present at the crucifixion?
People have to WANT to be cured. Itās a conscious insanity. Again, people have sufficient grace from God to choose God, they just donāt want to(Romans 1:18-32).You then wrote, "You may say that that is insane. It is; sin is spiritual insanity. Sin is our attempt to substitute Reality with un-reality. We all do it at one point or another.?
Are you saying that God is incapable of ācuringā insanity, be it spiritual or physical?
You should be careful taking and interpreting human descriptions of spiritual visions in an overly literalist manner. Visions are like parables, God communicates spiritual realities to us in ways that we can understand by our own limited ability to perceive, like any good teacher. The visions are/were to demonstrate visually the true horror of hell in a way that they could understand. The horror and deprivation of all light, goodness, beauty, and truth; the hoplessness and torment of the condemned, that is what the vision was meant to convey, not the idea the hell resides a few miles below us under the crust of the earth.Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth. Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear. The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repulsive likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent. This vision lasted but an instant. How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to heaven. Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.[5]
No one said anything about God āowingā usā¦or even hinted at that notion⦠so I am not sure why you introduced it. Let us not twist words.Iām sorry if I didnāt make it clear, but yes, it is immediate and irrevocable at the point of death.
There arenāt going to be any āpoint of death conversionsā. How we lived on earth is precisely how we are going to enter into eternity. Itās the reason why the Church offers last rights, or viaticum, to those who are dying.
Its the sin of presumption to assume that God owes you or anyone some final chance to convert after death. Weāre given our time on earth as a pure gift to spend for that end, to choose the good over the profane. If we spend it wastefully on ourselves, then thats our fault, not His.
You mustnāt confuse invincible ignorance with willful ignorance. I never said that the Church doesnāt allow for Godās mercy in those who have never had the opprotunity to enter into the covenant with God and would have. Thatās not the issue.No one said anything about God āowingā usā¦or even hinted at that notion⦠so I am not sure why you introduced it. Let us not twist words.
The Church does allow for the FACT that there are people who die without ever having been introduced to Jesus Christā¦catholics who die without viaticumā¦all sorts of possibilities, which are left to a reliance on Godās mercy and judgement alone, not ours.
God doesnāt live in ātimeā-time is what we use to measure change. There is no change in Godās eternity. There is no ātimeā in Godās eternity. Godās eternity encapsulates all of time and He simultaneously sees all points of time as āpresentā, as they are actually happening.Seems quite āpresumptiveā to me for mere men to think they know what happens āat point of deathā. As if Godās time has anything to do with our limited knowledge of time.
Ever thought that God just might know more than you?Do you know what double-predestination is?
No.
Predestination does not mean that āGod slung some here and some thereā. God doesnāt āslungā people anywhere.
Predestination means that God knows which people, by virtue of divine providence in accordance will their free decisions, are going to be in heaven and which will not.
Godās grace is not irresistable(Calvinism), we are all given sufficient grace to recognize God and to either choose Him or choose self-love/will.
Youāre confusing Redemption with Salvation, which a common protestant mistake. The Father forgives us through the covenant between Him and Jesus grounded in Christās sacrifice.
Our covenent as the Bride of Christ only creates a relationship with the Father through Christ; our covenant is specifically with Christ through Baptism and our participation with the sacraments(these are separate covenants). That is the only certain way we can know we have access to the Fatherās forgiveness, by being āone fleshā with the Son. The Gift has been offered to all.
Those who presistently reject Godās love and mercy through Christ are by definition denying Him. They reject the Gift offered.
Thatās the thing with any gift; there is the act of offering, there must also be the act of acceptance. God does not force the Gift upon people, and not everyone will accept it. Thatās just a simple fact. Those who reject it into eternity will not change their mind, becaue God will not change to accomodate their self-love/self-will. Thus they choose hell, God does not āslungā them there.
People have to WANT to be cured. Itās a conscious insanity. Again, people have sufficient grace from God to choose God, they just donāt want to(Romans 1:18-32).
Those in hell will not WANT to be cured, as I already explained.
This is an infallible teaching of the Church which you as a Catholic are obliged to believe.That seems closer to fundamental protestantism than to catholicismā¦
I have no doubt that He does. But thatās not the issue here.Ever thought that God just might know more than you?
These things I type are not the result of me having them āall figured outā. They are revealed truths of the Faith, revealed by the Church.You seem to think that you have everything about God and hell all figured out, ever thought that you just might not be correct?
Maybe my tag next to my screen name is not clear, but you do realize that Iām Catholic, donāt you?Ever thought or hoped that Godās Plan is or could be catholic?
Iām having trouble even understanding the point of this question.Ever meet Dad?
I beg to differ. Scripture says āGod is loveā. If you reversed those words and said," therefore love is God," you would be terribly incorrect. You would be deifying human love.Do you realize that Love is NOT an attribute of God but Is Godās Very Being?
The New covenant is with God through Christ," for there is no other name in heaven or on earth by which men can be saved."Do you consider Godās covenant with us thru God and us or thru God and God?
Thatās called a non-sequitur.Ever been to hell?
If not, than how do you know?
Thatās great for you. Iām glad that you have that perspective.God has a Plan and has had a Plan since before creation and I trust God that Godās Plan truly is GOOD NEWS, donāt know the details but donāt need to know the details.
Its because they think our words are subjective opinions coming from the individual saying them and not objective truth.I do not understand why people respond to the clear teaching of the Church with accusations of arrogance or of being a know it all. None of us know anything of ourselves. That is why the Church is there.
I agree. At least we might understand if that was the attitude of a non-Catholic but for a Catholic to take that position is putting themselves above the Church and God who stands behind the teachings of the Church.I do not understand why people respond to the clear teaching of the Church with accusations of arrogance or of being a know it all. None of us know anything of ourselves. That is why the Church is there.
Amandil : Itās not sarcasm. The battle between good and evil for a person is fiercest at the point of death and itās really up to the dying person to choose between the 2. Protestants believe that a personās reward in heaven is the same as anyone else whether youāre a martyr or a pardoned criminal. They donāt believe in purgatory. Why is it so hard for you to believe that our merciful Father in heaven loves everybody regardless of what kind of life we lived? Isnāt that what Jesus said in the Gospels, love everyone, even your enemies?I hope this is sarcasm. Because Iām pretty sure that this is at least heterodox and not taught by the Church.
My opinionā¦Godās infinite mercy is extended to everybody even up to the last seconds of his life but acceptance of Christ as oneās saviour and repentance is required to be absolved of his sins. After that, we get cleansed in purgatory, for how long, we donāt knowā¦We cannot change our minds after death. The Church teaching is clear on this. Our destination (damned or saved) is determined by the state of our soul at death and we then go immediately to Hell or are saved (Purgatory first or straight to Heaven).
Anyone who dies in a state of mortal sin is NOT able to repent and change their mind after they die. Its too late. Repentance must come before death.
I have no doubt that He does. But thatās not the issue here.
Weāre discussing things that have already been revealed through the Church. So your question really is irrelevent and seems more like a personal rhetorical attack.
These things I type are not the result of me having them āall figured outā. They are revealed truths of the Faith, revealed by the Church.
Again, this seems more like a personal attack because you find the teaching of the Church objectionable.
Iām sorry that you feel that way. I can only speculate as to why you hope for some chance after death for whoever to convert, which I refuse to do here.
What I know for certain is that hell is true, and it is eternal, de fide.
Those in hell are eternally lost, de fide.
Maybe my tag next to my screen name is not clear, but you do realize that Iām Catholic, donāt you?
Iām having trouble even understanding the point of this question.
I beg to differ. Scripture says āGod is loveā. If you reversed those words and said," therefore love is God," you would be terribly incorrect. You would be deifying human love.
God is Reality, God is the source of all Reality. Love is what God does, but it is not His essence or His true being, which is Being itself. God loves because love is true and beautiful.
Love, truth, and beauty have their source in God, but love, truth, and beauty are not God. God wholly transcends them.
Therefore love is an attribute of God, not Godās very being.
The New covenant is with God through Christ," for there is no other name in heaven or on earth by which men can be saved."
If anyone is saved, they are saved through Christ and only through Christ. Consequently the Church is the Body of Christ, that is why the Church is instrumental to the salvation of men.
Thatās called a non-sequitur.
No, I havenāt been to hell. But Iāve never had cancer either, that doesnāt mean that itās impossible for me to know the effects of cancer, how evil cancer is, and how it destroys a human person.
Jesus while He was on earth had never been to the hell of the damned, it didnāt stop Him from preaching about itās evil eternal torment.
Thatās great for you. Iām glad that you have that perspective.
But neither should you criticize me because I spent no small amount of time reading the teachings of the Chruch fathers and pondering these and many other things in my faith journey.
But I also ask you to ask yourself is it really fair to criticize me for seeking and knowing these things for which you have made the choice not to know, secure in your faith as you are?
And is it fair to attack me for revealing things to you that you asked about?
Is it fair to attack the messenger just for explaining the truth?