martino said:
Superboy, I may have missed it but I never saw your response to this post.
martino:
Do not try to handle more than one topic at a time. That is a common tactic that has been used against me, they keep throwing out issues before you have settled the one you were on. The reason they do this is because they have no answer for the Catholic response that is given to thier initial objection.
On the first topic regarding “call no man father”, just quote the Apostle Paul, "For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many father
s. For I
became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel."
1Cor 4:15. This completely obliterates their entire argument, but i wouldn’t go on to the next topic until they answer for this one. The fact is there is no answer unless St.Paul was mistaken and commited a sin and then erroneously recorded his sin as Scripture, which would then render Scripture no longer inerrant! My what a tangled web they weave!!!
Isn’t it funny that after all these years they still don’t get it!
Do you believe Catholics are wrong to refer to our priest as “father”? If so, how do you reconcile the verse above, or even calling your bioligical father, “father”?
Sorry, I have been gone for a while. I did try to get here to post a response, but the site was down for some period.
The “B” in “Super B” does NOT stand for boy, thank you.
For one thing, Paul says “…For I
became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.”, but does not command, advise, suggest, require, or in anyway state that it is OK to be called Father. Nor does he state in anyway, that he should be called Father. He refers to Timothy as his son (NIV I Corinthians 4:17: “17For this reason I am sending to you Timothy, my son whom I love, who is faithful in the Lord. He will remind you of my way of life in Christ Jesus, which agrees with what I teach everywhere in every church.”), & of course Timothy was not actually Pauls son in a physical sense.
Another thing, Jesus says in Matthew 23, “9And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.”. Jesus was speaking about the Pharisees & how they love to be seen & like to appear in important places of honor.
So I ask you, was Paul saying Jesus was wrong? Did Jesus somehow mis-speak? Did Jesus NOT mean what he said? Should we read into a comment by Paul that it is OK to CALL a man Father, & assume Jesus meant something other than what he said? I believe this is how we have come to have so many different “denominations”, because people want to interpret a statement made in the Bible as meaning something other than what was actually said.
No one on Earth is perfect. No one on Earth can trully comprehend & understand all the mysteries of God. God gave us his word (the bible) as a “handbook” for life. We New Testament Christians MAY be wrong about some things, but it is not from lack of studying or mis-interpreting what the word of God says. We take Gods word at face value & do not add to or take away from. So for me, Jesus states “call no man Father”, & that is what I will believe.