Help! I'm being eaten alive by fundamentalists!

  • Thread starter Thread starter heliumspark
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Super B:
Sorry, I have been gone for a while. I did try to get here to post a response, but the site was down for some period.

The “B” in “Super B” does NOT stand for boy, thank you.

For one thing, Paul says “…For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.”, but does not command, advise, suggest, require, or in anyway state that it is OK to be called Father. Nor does he state in anyway, that he should be called Father. He refers to Timothy as his son (NIV I Corinthians 4:17: “17For this reason I am sending to you Timothy, my son whom I love, who is faithful in the Lord. He will remind you of my way of life in Christ Jesus, which agrees with what I teach everywhere in every church.”), & of course Timothy was not actually Pauls son in a physical sense.

Another thing, Jesus says in Matthew 23, “9And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.”. Jesus was speaking about the Pharisees & how they love to be seen & like to appear in important places of honor.

So I ask you, was Paul saying Jesus was wrong? Did Jesus somehow mis-speak? Did Jesus NOT mean what he said? Should we read into a comment by Paul that it is OK to CALL a man Father, & assume Jesus meant something other than what he said? I believe this is how we have come to have so many different “denominations”, because people want to interpret a statement made in the Bible as meaning something other than what was actually said.

No one on Earth is perfect. No one on Earth can trully comprehend & understand all the mysteries of God. God gave us his word (the bible) as a “handbook” for life. We New Testament Christians MAY be wrong about some things, but it is not from lack of studying or mis-interpreting what the word of God says. We take Gods word at face value & do not add to or take away from. So for me, Jesus states “call no man Father”, & that is what I will believe.
The question is for you to answer, not for us; was Paul wrong to refer to himself as a “father” to Timothy or to refer to Timothy as his son? You are acting like either Jesus or Paul was wrong, when we both know that neigher of them were. If you think that what Jesus said in Mt. 23 meant that we cannot call earthly men father then by logical extension you believe that Paul was wrong to do just that.

We are saying that Jesus was not speaking literal, so therefore what Paul said is perfectly valid.

Can’t you see that your interpretation means that Paul not only sinned by calling himself “father” but then erroneously recorded it in Scripture rendering Scripture errant!

The bottom line is this, either Paul was wrong or Jesus wasn’t speaking literally.

Which one will you take?
 
the problem that occurs to me is that while YOU are being eaten alive by fundies, Jesus is being eaten alive by catholics.

if the fundies would accept Jesus’s invitation to eat HIM alive, they’d probably leave you alone.
 
😃 The WHOLE CRUX of OUR faith is this, and there:

WOULD you/u or WOULD YOU/U NOT CALL JESUS = FATHER???

NAB: JN 3:6 What is born of flesh is flesh and what is born of spirit is spirit.

KJV: JN 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

NAB: JN 4:24 God is Spirit, and those who worship him must worship in Spirit and truth."

KJV: 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Ask ANYBODY in ,“DOUBT,” would you/U call JESUS FATHER?

Granted the Father is ,“GREATER THAN JUST JESUS,” but is the HOLY SPIRIT one?

JN 14:28 You heard me tell you, ‘I am going away and I will come back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father; for the Father is greater than I.

JN 15:4 Remain in me, as I remain in you. Just as a branch cannot bear fruit on its own unless it remains on the vine, so neither can you unless you remain in me.

JN 15:6 Anyone who does not remain in me will be thrown out like a branch and wither; people will gather them and throw them into a fire and they will be burned.

THE ORGINAL QUESTION: “IS THE FATHER IN US?” 👍
 
40.png
martino:
The question is for you to answer, not for us; was Paul wrong to refer to himself as a “father” to Timothy or to refer to Timothy as his son? You are acting like either Jesus or Paul was wrong, when we both know that neigher of them were. If you think that what Jesus said in Mt. 23 meant that we cannot call earthly men father then by logical extension you believe that Paul was wrong to do just that.

We are saying that Jesus was not speaking literal, so therefore what Paul said is perfectly valid.

Can’t you see that your interpretation means that Paul not only sinned by calling himself “father” but then erroneously recorded it in Scripture rendering Scripture errant!

The bottom line is this, either Paul was wrong or Jesus wasn’t speaking literally.

Which one will you take?
Hmmm? I thought I did answer the question. Just not in so many words.

“Do you believe Catholics are wrong to refer to our priest as “father”? If so, how do you reconcile the verse above, or even calling your bioligical father, “father”?”

Yes. See my last my explanation above.
 
40.png
jeffreedy789:
the problem that occurs to me is that while YOU are being eaten alive by fundies, Jesus is being eaten alive by catholics.

if the fundies would accept Jesus’s invitation to eat HIM alive, they’d probably leave you alone.
huh?
 
Anyway, I should know better. We could go round & round on this. We look at things differently. Our opinions will not likely change. Let’s agree to disagree. No matter what you point out to me, or I point out to you, we will hold firm our stance.

Agree to disagree?
 
Super B:
Hmmm? I thought I did answer the question. Just not in so many words.

“Do you believe Catholics are wrong to refer to our priest as “father”? If so, how do you reconcile the verse above, or even calling your bioligical father, “father”?”

Yes. See my last my explanation above.
You are right that will continue to disagree, but I am still not following you. Unless I am totally missing something you have not yet answered my question.

You believe Catholics are wrong to use the word “father” yet you have not explained how Paul uses it without committing a serious error and then compounding his error by recording it in Scripture.

I did see where you referenced what Paul said but there was no explanation for it… you only said that he didnt command that we use the term, but we never said that it was commanded to begin with and the fact that Paul uses it demonstrates how appropriate it is when refering to our spiritual leaders.

Can you please elaborate further?
 
40.png
MariaG:
Then you must believe in the real presence of Christ? And confession to others for forgiveness of sins? If not I would sincerely like to know why when the clear words of Christ indicate both.

God Bless,
Maria
I believe in Christs real presence inside me right here and right now.
Do you believe that you must be born again. Surely Jesus stated as such?
 
Super B:
Anyway, I should know better. We could go round & round on this. We look at things differently. Our opinions will not likely change. Let’s agree to disagree. No matter what you point out to me, or I point out to you, we will hold firm our stance.

Agree to disagree?
No, I think we should agree with the teaching by the Apostles. How can we know how they believed and intrepreted them? By reading the writings of those first Christians that were directly taught by them. Many of those writings are still available. For example, the writings of Igantius of Antioch who was taught directly by John and Paul, and consegrated by Peter. There are also the writings of others Polycarp, Justin Martyr, Clement, etc. These were directily taught by the Apostles.

May the love of God the Father, the peace of His Son Jesus Christ, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you.
 
40.png
martino:
You are right that will continue to disagree, but I am still not following you. Unless I am totally missing something you have not yet answered my question.

You believe Catholics are wrong to use the word “father” yet you have not explained how Paul uses it without committing a serious error and then compounding his error by recording it in Scripture.

I did see where you referenced what Paul said but there was no explanation for it… you only said that he didnt command that we use the term, but we never said that it was commanded to begin with and the fact that Paul uses it demonstrates how appropriate it is when refering to our spiritual leaders.

Can you please elaborate further?
Look, I don’t have all the answers, & I can’t explain (right now), why Paul said what he said. If you do have all the answers, perhaps you can explain to me what christ meant when he said “call no man Father” in Mattew.

I can not ellaborate further, as I have given the best explanation my feeble mind can give.
 
40.png
Xavier:
I believe in Christs real presence inside me right here and right now.
Do you believe that you must be born again. Surely Jesus stated as such?
I know I do.
 
Hello, heliumspark,

Well, I visited the site you referrenced. I read a few of
the pages on one thread, and the only question that
I would be at a loss to address was the idea that
the binding power given to Peter ended with Peter’s
death.

Hmmm, I said to myself.

reen12

I pray to the God of Israel and hope that Jesus
was the Messiah.
 
40.png
heliumspark:
catholicisim teaches a lot of false truths.

i’ll just point out one…reconciliation

the Bible teaches…all sins are forgiven at the point of salvation, because Christ’s death satisfied all God’s wrath against sin [cols 2:13-14]

Catholicism teaches…sins are only potentially forgiven, and must be worked off through a process mediated by the church and its sacraments over the lifetime of the believer.
Know, you are dealing with people who believe “being saved” allows one to do whatever you want - because “all sins are forgiven at the point of salvation”. According to them, since Christ’s death has forgiven all your sins past, present, and future… one does not need to worry about sinning/offending God because everything is forgiven, perhaps even before you commit the sin.

Even St. Paul was not completely sure of his salvation. Of course, Paul had faith in Christ he was going to be saved. Still, he knew he could loose his salvation if he did not do the will of God.

St Paul wrote, “Do you not know that in a race all the runners compete, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. 25 Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. 26 Well, I do not run aimlessly, I do not box as one beating the air; 27 but I pommel my body and subdue it, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.” [1 Cor. 9:24-27]

Therefore, St. Paul thought he could be ***disqualified ***from achieving the ULTIMATE and IMPERISHABLE prize - Salvation. How could that be when according to Fundamentalists, St. Paul had nothing to worry about; after being “saved”, there are NO disqualifications, all sins - past present and future sins are forgiven. However, St. Paul knew he could sin (against the Holy Spirit) and not be saved.

I may be mistaken, but every Christian who is in Hell is present there because he/she committed a sin/blasphemy against the Holy Spirit:

These are a few of the Sins against the Holy Spirit.
  1. Despair: is to lack all hope of God’s forgiveness.
  2. Presumption of God’s mercy: is to expect God to forgive you even though you lack sorry and conversion. Presumption can also include presuming you were responsible for your salvation.
  3. Obstinacy in sin: is to persist in sin and thus to resist the sanctifying power of the Holy Spirit.
  4. Final impenitence: is to be unrepentant - to die without remorse.

The Sacrament of Confession contains remedies to combat the Sins against the Holy Spirit.

The person who receives the Sacrament of Confession does not need to despair because they have full confidence their sins are forgiven as prescribed in John 20:23. Jesus gave his apostles, and thus their successors, the authority to forgive sins:

And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained.” [John 20:23]

The person who gives a valid confession, does not presume God’s forgiveness, they **seek **God’s mercy and forgiveness with a contrite heart and in obedience to His will.

The person who gives a valid confession, is not obstinate in sin because a part of a valid confession requires a person to “go and sin no more”.

The person who gives a valid confession, is not impenitent because for the confession to be valid, there must be sorrow for your sins.

“Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.” [Mt. 12:32]

“But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit can never have forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin.” [Mk. 3:29]

“And everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven; but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.” [Lk. 12:10]

Now the Fundamentalists will probably not accept despair, presumption of God’s mercy, obstinacy in sin, and final impenitence as sins against the Holy Spirit. Nor will they accept the apostles’ authority in forgiving sins.

Note:

If I am incorrect in anything, please correct me. I never learned this as a whole. I kind of put it all together.
 
I find it interesting how some people will go out of there way to preach to other people just to get an argument started. If you don’t like what the Church of Christ teaches don’t ask. It’s pretty simple. Why be so insercure in your own faith to worry about what they think. To go on their site to dileberately start an argument. That’s how the division between the people of Ireland started. It all started with a few arguments. To the Catholics who believe in civil conversation thank you. To all the young hot heads out there learn from you elders. Personally I don’t care what denomination you are or if you don’t like that word what church your from. To be called a Christian you just have to follow christ. Whether you get that feeling from the more extravagant masses held by the catholic church, a simple protestant service, or if you just go as far as to only attend a backwoods country church your christian. The only way christianity even has a chance of really succeeding in this new times is to function as one. If you want to hold on to petty differences over doctrine that is your own affair. But why go out looking to stir up trouble with fellow christians. The real enemy is still out there and it comes in the form of rejecting christ altogether and the divisions you create helps that happen. If one church wants to think its better than another I guess we have all forgotten how to be humble. You are right in believing christ has only one church but to think it is only the catholic or protestant faith is crazy. It is like the jews when they assumed that jesus came for only them and to over throw the evil romans. He came for all people. Did you ever think about concentrating on the similiarities instead of the differences. Well in closing some closed minded individual may coment on my spelling or sentence structure in order to escape the points I have made but who cares I don’t. Last I read Jesus showed more love and didn’t try to stir up so much strife.
 
Hi Yupyup

Welcome to Catholic Forums! Not to worry, many of us here have lousy sentence structure but very valid points!

You have many, many loaded sentences in your post. I trust you are looking for answers and invite you to spend some time reading through some of the applicable threads and making use of the library at this site!
 
posted by Xavier
I believe in Christs real presence inside me right here and right now.
Well that is great! I do too. But you side-stepped the question of the Real Presence of Christ as presented in the gospels telling us we must literally “chew and gnaw” Him.
Do you believe that you must be born again. Surely Jesus stated as such?
:yup: And the Catholic Church teaches this also.

CCC #

[1257](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/1257.htm’)😉 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation.60 He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them.61 Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.62 The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are “reborn of water and the Spirit.” God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.

60 Cf. Jn 3:5. Jesus answered,
“Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.”
61 Cf. Mt 28:19-20; cf. Council of Trent (1547) DS 1618; LG 14; AG 5.
62 Cf. Mk 16:16.

1270 “Reborn as sons of God, [the baptized] must profess before men the faith they have received from God through the Church” and participate in the apostolic and missionary activity of the People of God.80

Now, whether born again is a *spirtual act of **God *through baptism that can be administered to adult (who repents with an inward change of heart) or an infant (whose parents then speak for then just like in Circumcision the adults choose for the child), or an act of man repenting with an inward change of the heart with baptism not being equal to born again that is deserving of its own thread:D

God Bless,
Maria
p.s. I did have a born again *experience *at the age of 26! Awesome! And the best part is, I never lose that “first love” of God. Through the Real Presence, communion, I renew that love every time I receive!
 
40.png
jeffreedy789:
the problem that occurs to me is that while YOU are being eaten alive by fundies, Jesus is being eaten alive by catholics.

if the fundies would accept Jesus’s invitation to eat HIM alive, they’d probably leave you alone.
ROTFL!!! 👍
 
my suggestion to all is to get a few apologetics books an read them well then you are going to be ready to face fundamentalist. by the way some of this books are written by ex fundamentalist like scott hahn and david currie. :clapping: bless you all
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top