J
JReducation
Guest
I know some of the houses of which you’re speaking. You are confusing sisters with nuns, but that’s OK. Remember, both the Franciscan and Benedictine families have sisters and nuns. Nuns do not run colleges or ever mingle with the outside world, sisters do, even those who live in monasteries. These monsteries are a little different from those of enclosed communities. They serve different functions.I think that there is a substantial difference of opinion present among monastics in the US. The Poor Clares in Greenville SC built a new monastery recently–very simple, one story. They moved because they were being surrounded by the encroaching city and noise and their former monastery needed a lot of serious work. Their property was valuable, being commercial, so they sold it, bought property far out of town, started a capital campaign which promptly filled, and built. They have no debt. They are growing.
However, the Poor Clares in VA built a huge monastery styled like an Italian hill town on the top of a mountain (VA-style) that they had to level. At the time of their building, they had a blog, since discontinued, in which the abbess frankly described all the dunning they had to do of the local dioceses to come up with the money. I don’t know if it’s paid off or not. They have had a lot of drainage problems and require maintenance men to change the light bulbs in their high-ceilinged choir.
The PCPA’s in Arizona, the ‘desert nuns’, are also building a grandiose Italian-Renaissance styled monastery , and they feature prominently in their blog opportunities to buy windows, etc in it. I don’t know how the fund raising is going. It is an immense project. These are also Poor Clares, very different from those in Greenville, SC.
The Benedictine women’s monasteries have tried to divest themselves of their huge 19thc. monasteries, or turn them into senior care, both for their members and the communities at large. One monastery was saddled with a single gigantic building, which included the monastery, college and novitiate, over 100,000 squ feet, which they finally managed to get torn down, after getting no takers to buy it. Others, such as Duluth OSB’s of St. Scholastica, still have their gigantic plant, but which contains their excellent college. They are filled with elderly sisters,s but have entrants and new members. If you asked many of these communities whether, if they had the chance, armed with entrants and money, they would commit to building huge edifices again, I am certain that the vast majority would say “No”. And these are Benedictines, with their history and tradition of Stability, one of their vows, education in their many schools, the great monasteries of yore.
I suspect that the Benedictine men’s monasteries also have difficulties in upkeep of their immense buildings, but have no information. All of these monasteries are shrinking, even as many, Sts. Meinrad, Vincent, John, attract new members. The shrinking Trappist communities have large holdings AND property to maintain. The Carthusians are definitely shrinking in the western hemisphere; however I must add that the nuns are increasing, now about 75 worldwide. Soon there may be more Carthusian nuns than monks!
The Dominican nuns of Summit NJ had a foundress who envisioned 15 separate chapels for the 15 decades of the rosary. Fortunately she was able to build only one(?) unit before financial reality intervened. However, because her building was incomplete, it was filled with a lot of inconveniences and incongruities which were able to be addressed only recently.
I personally think that it is unwise to commit to vast architectural piles, no matter how traditional or inspirational they may be to some, as no one knows what the future may bring. Life appeared to be very stable in the Middle Ages, and for a long time it was. Then it wasn’t. And things happen much faster these days.
Something else to consider is that fact that the armies of lay brothers/sisters who maintained these vast structures don’t exist anymore. Someone is going to have to maintain all of this, not only the housekeeping but the electrical, plumbing, heating, etc. All of this assumes a large novitiate, which may be present now, but which may not continue.
All of this resembles those poor married couples who until recently had two well-paying jobs and who found a bank who was willing to lend them far more for a home mortgage than they had any reason to expect. Many of these homes are now in foreclosure.
It is true that many of the old orders of monks had a class of monks called “lay brother”. This was banned by Vatican II. Only those communities that had two classes of monks were allowed to have lay brothers. But this doesn’t really create a challenge in maintenance. You simply have one class of monks and everyone has to work. You no longer have the choir monks and the lay brothers. You now have the monks, some ordained and some lay, but all equally monks in solemn vows.
The Caremelite Monks do not have lay brothers. In fact, they have very few ordained monks, which is as monasticism should be. But that’s where the laity comes in. You hire lay people to do certain jobs. Like any other family, you do as much of the work as you can and then you hire people to do the rest. That’s one reason why monastic communities are not allowed to be poor. They cost a lot of money to operate. God always provides the money. He has lots of money.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF