Hey, is there anybody here at CAF, who believes that Jesus Christ had biological brothers and can you prove it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You’re misunderstanding me – of course we can pray for our family, friends, and anyone else for that matter (I do all the time). Indeed God asks us to pray for everyone – so that all will come to know Him. What I mean by mediation is Christ is our advocate before God & none other. However, we can pray for others, not only ourselves (in fact God smiles at us when we unselfishly pray for others). 🙂

I never meant to imply otherwise?
But please forgive me i cant see how praying to God through Christ is intercession? I mean God, Jesus the Holy Spirit thats the Trinity. Again im not seeing what you are. I mean to me they are all made up of one person. I mean in our religion we never saw the Blessed Mother or the saints as a mediator. mediator makes decisions. And I totally agree that Christ is our advocate, I dont disagree with that either, No one comes between us and God, But I still dont understand how asking someone to pray for us Intercession makes them a mediator. They dont go to God for us. Only we can do that. They pray to God FOR us. that is a big difference. And to ask the Blessed Mother to pray for us especially at our hour of need would in no way step over God, and to have her pray for us can do nothing for us but help us. Why would anyone not want her prayers. Thats what i still dont think you and I are connecting on.
 
But please forgive me i cant see how praying to God through Christ is intercession?
**You couldn’t have misread me this much? We ARE to pray to God through Christ … this is a valid form of intercession. **

sorry for shouting (you know I like you Rinnie) but gosh I said this like three times already???
And to ask the Blessed Mother to pray for us especially at our hour of need would in no way step over God, and to have her pray for us can do nothing for us but help us. Why would anyone not want her prayers. Thats what i still dont think you and I are connecting on.
Here’s the only area we disagree on. I do not venerate Mary nor do I ask the saints to intercede for me. I am a protestant – this is a core distinction of protestants. I firmly believe Christ is our one mediator. IMO if Mary had such an important role in the economy of salvation surely the Apostles would have said something about it? Yet … not a word. Even Paul refers to Mary as a “woman” ascribing no intercessory role to her.

If Mary were the queen of heaven, spouse of the Holy Spirit, co-redeemer, mediatrix of ALL graces, and the new Eve surely an Apostle would have gave us a little clue – even a hint? Surely Polycarp, Ignatius, and Clement who walked with the Apostles would have given us a tiny hint at least? Yet nothing? So I believe that I do follow the Apostolic teachings – indeed to the letter.
 
My response did take into account your earlier post – and I do acknowledge that it was one of the townspeople whose outcry Jesus responded to. However, it is clear from the context that these were actual sisters of Jesus.

Isn’t this Mary’s son and the brother of James, Joseph, Judas and Simon? Aren’t his sisters here with us?" And they took offense at him.

The reference to sisters directly follows the reference to Jesus’ brothers. The context couldn’t be more clear. Indeed not only does this tell us these women were sisters – it makes the idea that these brothers of Christ (referred to here) are actually His cousins, rather absurd.

This goes far beyond honest intellectual disagreement over ambiguous text. The entire cousin theory is bizarre.

At least the Orthodox view (also held by many Roman Catholic theologians) is possible from the text – while yours doesn’t just strain the text, its recreates it, revises its plain meaning, and strips your argument of any semblance of credibility.

Your not just saying the orange might be a different shade of orange than it seems to be – you’re saying it’s an apple, when everyone knows it’s not.
You are creating your own context and straining the text by presuming James, Joses, Simon, and Jude are biological brothers without any regard to the lists of the apostles. They are close relatives and followers of Jesus as are the sisters. In semitic usage ‘adelphe’ extends beyond female siblings within the family.
 
You are creating your own context and straining the text by presuming James, Joses, Simon, and Jude are biological brothers without any regard to the lists of the apostles. They are close relatives and followers of Jesus as are the sisters. In semitic usage ‘adelphe’ extends beyond female siblings within the family.
Right – it can extend to a “sister” in Christ (or a fellow Hebrew for that matter) – but not other relatives, such as cousins. Again, within this context the idea that the reference is to a “sister” as in fellow Christian or fellow Hebrew (or something along those lines) is erroneous.
 
**You couldn’t have misread me this much? We ARE to pray to God through Christ … this is a valid form of intercession. **

sorry for shouting (you know I like you Rinnie) but gosh I said this like three times already???

Here’s the only area we disagree on. I do not venerate Mary nor do I ask the saints to intercede for me. I am a protestant – this is a core distinction of protestants. I firmly believe Christ is our one mediator. IMO if Mary had such an important role in the economy of salvation surely the Apostles would have said something about it? Yet … not a word. Even Paul refers to Mary as a “woman” ascribing no intercessory role to her.

If Mary were the queen of heaven, spouse of the Holy Spirit, co-redeemer, mediatrix of ALL graces, and the new Eve surely an Apostle would have gave us a little clue – even a hint? Surely Polycarp, Ignatius, and Clement who walked with the Apostles would have given us a tiny hint at least? Yet nothing? So I believe that I do follow the Apostolic teachings – indeed to the letter.
Ok ss i like you to calm down lets not get testy now. But while you are a little testy the answer to you other question is cousins. It really is.
 
Right – it can extend to a “sister” in Christ (or a fellow Hebrew for that matter) – but not other relatives, such as cousins. Again, within this context the idea that the reference is to a “sister” as in fellow Christian or fellow Hebrew (or something along those lines) is erroneous.
Absolutely. And to claim that the authors of the New Testament didn’t know the difference between brother and cousin is to know very little about the entire subject.
 
Ok ss i like you to calm down lets not get testy now. But while you are a little testy the answer to you other question is cousins. It really is.
I had to shout Rinnie – I answered your question like three times & you still didn’t get me 🙂 I wasn’t mad though (just shouting – but shouting with a smile).

Anyways … the answer cannot be cousins – if Mary is a perpetual virgin it can only be step-brothers & sisters. However, I think that’s wrong too – I don’t think Mary was a perpetual virgin … I think she had a normal marriage with Joseph.
 
I had to shout Rinnie – I answered your question like three times & you still didn’t get me 🙂 I wasn’t mad though (just shouting – but shouting with a smile).

Anyways … the answer cannot be cousins – if Mary is a perpetual virgin it can only be step-brothers & sisters. However, I think that’s wrong too – I don’t think Mary was a perpetual virgin … I think she had a normal marriage with Joseph.
Nothing in Scripture suggests otherwise…
 
I had to shout Rinnie – I answered your question like three times & you still didn’t get me 🙂 I wasn’t mad though (just shouting – but shouting with a smile).

Anyways … the answer cannot be cousins – if Mary is a perpetual virgin it can only be step-brothers & sisters. However, I think that’s wrong too – I don’t think Mary was a perpetual virgin … I think she had a normal marriage with Joseph.
Now now SS i am going to have to call you on that one and again here is why. Brothers means cousins or near relations in Hebr. and Aramaic. Now how could Mary having cousins, relatives in any way have anything to do with her being a Virgin, and only having one child.

Now here is just something else to think about? Jesus was in his thirty’s when he died. Now dont you think if the Blessed Mother had other children it would not be hidden, why would it? You dont think some how some way when they showed and talked about the Holy Family all of these years it would just be Joseph, Mary and Jesus. No come on what did the Blessed Mother do leave them out of the picture. thats a little crazy isnt it.
 
Now now SS i am going to have to call you on that one and again here is why. Brothers means cousins or near relations in Hebr. and Aramaic. Now how could Mary having cousins, relatives in any way have anything to do with her being a Virgin, and only having one child.
First, the Aramaic word for brother can mean either brother or cousin. However, in Koine Greek (which the NT was largely written in) there is a separate word for cousin – so why would Paul for instance use brother?
Now here is just something else to think about? Jesus was in his thirty’s when he died. Now dont you think if the Blessed Mother had other children it would not be hidden, why would it? You dont think some how some way when they showed and talked about the Holy Family all of these years it would just be Joseph, Mary and Jesus. No come on what did the Blessed Mother do leave them out of the picture. thats a little crazy isnt it.
It wasn’t hidden – Jesus’ siblings are well recorded throughout the New Testament, it’s only “hidden” from you guys (I can read it as plain as day) 🙂
 
rinnie;4137493]Now now SS i am going to have to call you on that one and again here is why. Brothers means cousins or near relations in Hebr. and Aramaic.
Are you aware there is no evidence for any Gospel written in Aramaic?
Now how could Mary having cousins, relatives in any way have anything to do with her being a Virgin, and only having one child.
Not sure what you mean here. Can you clarify?
Now here is just something else to think about? Jesus was in his thirty’s when he died. Now dont you think if the Blessed Mother had other children it would not be hidden, why would it? You dont think some how some way when they showed and talked about the Holy Family all of these years it would just be Joseph, Mary and Jesus. No come on what did the Blessed Mother do leave them out of the picture. thats a little crazy isnt it.
Mary’s other children were not “hidden”. We know that James and Jude were both authors of NT books and were brothers of Jesus.
 
Hey, is there anybody here at CAF, who believes that Jesus Christ had biological brothers and can you prove it?
Here is the evidence that Mary did in fact have other children:
  1. No mention of it in the Scripture. She nor do any writers claim she was a perpetual virgin.
  2. The passage in Luke 1:48 in which Mary says she is a virgin does not mean she took a vow of perpetual virginity. It is only that she is a virgin up to this point in time.
  3. The idea that a person who is about to be married is taking or has taken a vow of perpetual virginity is unheard of Biblically. There is no indication from the OT or NT that it would be acceptable to be married and yet chose to be a perpetual virgin. Married Jewish couples were to be fruitful and multiply. This is OT teaching.
  4. Her response is in response to the timing. It seems the angel is saying she will conceive immediately since she was not currently having sexual relations with Joseph. Secondly she says – “But Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I have no relations with a man?” If she had taken some vow not ever to have sex she would have said something like— How can this be, since I will have no relations with a man?"
    Thirdly it does look like that she did conceive shortly after this. If you look at the timeline between this announcement and her meeting with Elizabeth and add the time up it must have been very soon after the announcement. This would lend support to that it was almost immediately.
This kind of explanation does not require a person to speculate about any vows by Mary or her and Joseph making some kind of covenant in their marriage never to engage in sexual relations which would have been unheard of in a marriage or a violation of the command for married couples to procreate and multiply if they could.
  1. If Mary had only one child born to her Luke in his narrative would have used a different word in than “first born” (Luke 2:7) and would have used a word for “only born” instead.
  2. Code:
     When brothers and sisters are used in connection with father or mother then it does not mean cousins but actual blood brothers and sisters. See Matthew 13:55-56, Mark 3:31-32 and Mark 6:3
  3. In the previous passages noted the best way to understand these relationships “brothers-sisters” is that these are siblings of Jesus by blood.
  4. There is no hint in Scripture that Joseph was previously married and had children.
  5. Paul refers to James as the “brother of the Lord” in Galatians 1:19.
  6. If we don’t take Mark 3:31-32 as Jesus blood brothers then further in the passage we have a weakened exhortation in verse 33-35 if we use the word cousin or relative instead of blood relationships.
  7. 32 A crowd was sitting around Him, and they *said to Him, “Behold, Your mother and Your brothers are outside looking for You.”
    33 Answering them, He *said, “Who are My mother and My brothers?”
    34 Looking about at those who were sitting around Him, He *said, “Behold My mother and My brothers!
    35 “For whoever does the will of God, he is My brother and sister and mother.”
Instead of the word “brother” insert the word cousin or relative.

32 A crowd was sitting around Him, and they *said to Him, “Behold, Your mother and Your “cousins-relatives” are outside looking for You.”
33 Answering them, He *said, “Who are My mother and My “cousins-relatives”?”

34 Looking about at those who were sitting around Him, He *said, “Behold My mother and My “cousins-relatives”!
35 “For whoever does the will of God, he is My “cousins-relatives” and “cousins-relatives” and mother.”

This saying does not cover all family relationships.
  1. Catholic translations use the words “brothers and sisters” when addressing their relationship to Christ.
  2. There are Greek words for cousin—anepsios as in Colossians 4:10 or kinsman = sungenis which is used in Luke 1:36
  3. Psalm 69:8 could also be used to establish Jesus had brothers. " I have become estranged from my brothers
    And an alien to my mother’s sons."
 
Hi everyone! Here’s my (name removed by moderator)ut to this.

WHEN Jesus came to His own hometown synagogue to preach, he astonished the people with His teachings. In their amazement, they asked, “Whence hath THIS man this wisdom, and these mighty works? Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not ALL with us?” (Matt. 13:54-56).

Notice it!

This scripture clearly states that Christ had FOUR brothers, all of them being personally named. The added question, “And his sisters, are they not ALL with us?” implies that He had AT LEAST THREE SISTERS. If He had only two, they would have used the term, “both,” instead of “all.”

Some claim that these were not really brothers and sisters, only cousins. But Scripture reveals this is NOT TRUE.

Here is the proof.

The word “brethren” is translated from the Greek word for “brother” – “adelphos.” This word may mean a spiritual brother, but it does not mean “cousin.”

The English word “cousin” in Luke 1:36 and 58 is translated from “suggenes” in the original Greek. This clearly shows that the New Testament, when referring to Jesus’ family, makes them brothers and not cousins.
Code:
                        Not Spiritual Brothers
What about the contention that these were Christ’s spiritual brothers and sisters, instead of His blood brothers and sisters – His siblings?

We find the answer in John 2:12. Christ went to Capernaum, accompanied by “His mother, and His brethren, AND HIS DISCIPLES.”

Here we find a sharp distinction is made between His BRETHREN and His DISCIPLES showing that they WERE NOT the same. His SPIRITUAL brethren WERE His disciples – those who believed His teachings. His flesh and blood brothers did not believe Him (John 7:5). This scripture certainly makes James, Joses, Simon and Judas His blood brothers.

In Mark’s account of Jesus’ visit to His hometown synagogue, we find the people wondering about His great wisdom. They asked, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us?” (Mark 6:3).

These people, who had known Jesus from childhood, specifically stated that He was the brother of several other young people who had grown up in their midst. These people were VERY familiar with family relationships throughout the village. Notice that they are not called cousins, but brothers.
Code:
                    Mary Not a Perpetual Virgin
Mary did not stay a virgin throughout her life as Matthew was inspired to write that, Joseph “took unto him his wife: And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son…” (Mat. 1:24-25). Notice that Joseph “knew her not” only while Mary was with child. In other words, after that time – after the child’s birth – Joseph “knew her.”
Code:
                          Christ the "Firstborn"
In Matthew 1:25 we find that Christ is called the “FIRSTBORN” son of Mary. The word “firstborn” is translated from the Greek word, “prototokon” which means the firstborn among other children – the oldest of several children in a family. If Jesus had been Mary’s ONLY child, the Greek word “monogenes,” meaning “only child,” would have been used in the original Greek text. Jesus was the “only begotten” human son of the Heavenly Father (John 1:18). But He was the “first born” – not an “only child” – of Mary!

Many other New Testament scriptures tell us distinctly that Jesus Christ was not the only child of His mother.

In Galatians 1:18-19, Paul mentioned having seen not only Peter, but also James the Lord’s brother in Jerusalem. We know that Paul was speaking of a brother in the flesh. If he had been speaking of a spiritual brother – a brother in the faith – he certainly would have included Peter among Christ’s spiritual brethren. But he did not!

Paul knew that Christ had other brothers. He stated: “Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the BRETHREN OF THE LORD, and Cephas [Peter]?” (I Cor. 9:5). Notice that the brethren of the Lord are distinct from the twelve apostles. In Acts 1:13-14 we find that THE DISCIPLES “continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, AND WITH HIS BRETHREN.”

Some have, in argument, referred to Matthew 12:46-50. Here Christ said, “Whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.” They have claimed this scripture as proof that when the Bible speaks of Christ’s brethren, it means spiritual brethren. They claim therefore that He may not have had any brothers in the flesh. Such an argument is without foundation. If this scripture proved that Christ had no brothers or sisters, IT WOULD ALSO PROVE THAT HE HAD NO MOTHER. What Christ meant in this statement is that those who OBEY THE FATHER are all equally precious in His sight, regardless of blood relationship.

The author is a certain J.W. Robinson. I added the part titled “Mary Not a Perpetual Virgin.”
 
The last part of J.W. Robinson’s article:

“My MOTHER’S Children”

As a final proof that Jesus Christ was not the ONLY CHILD of His mother, let us turn to Psalm 69:8, which all Bible scholars recognize as a prophecy concerning Christ. In this scripture we read, “I am become a stranger unto MY BRETHREN, and an alien unto MY MOTHER’S CHILDREN.” Christ certainly was speaking of His PHYSICAL mother and brethren – blood relatives – in this prophecy. Christ’s spiritual mother is the Church (Rev. 12:1-5) and His spiritual brethren are His followers – those who compose the true Church today (Matt. 12:49-50, Rom. 8:16-17, 29). Christ’s spiritual brethren certainly recognized Him from the beginning of His ministry (John 1:35-49). He WAS a stranger (an alien) to His physical brethren, however. They did not believe in Him during His ministry (John 7:2-5), although some of them were converted after His resurrection.

Anyone who earnestly believes that the Holy Bible is the inspired Word of God, CANNOT fail to see these facts. These scriptures definitely PROVE – absolutely – that Jesus Christ did have brothers and sisters who were the children of His mother. Their father was Joseph. Joseph was the legal, not actual, father of Jesus. This means that Jesus and His brothers and sisters had the same mother, but not the same father.
 
The last part of J.W. Robinson’s article:

“My MOTHER’S Children”

As a final proof that Jesus Christ was not the ONLY CHILD of His mother, let us turn to Psalm 69:8, which all Bible scholars recognize as a prophecy concerning Christ. In this scripture we read, “I am become a stranger unto MY BRETHREN, and an alien unto MY MOTHER’S CHILDREN.” Christ certainly was speaking of His PHYSICAL mother and brethren – blood relatives – in this prophecy. Christ’s spiritual mother is the Church (Rev. 12:1-5) and His spiritual brethren are His followers – those who compose the true Church today (Matt. 12:49-50, Rom. 8:16-17, 29). Christ’s spiritual brethren certainly recognized Him from the beginning of His ministry (John 1:35-49). He WAS a stranger (an alien) to His physical brethren, however. They did not believe in Him during His ministry (John 7:2-5), although some of them were converted after His resurrection.

Anyone who earnestly believes that the Holy Bible is the inspired Word of God, CANNOT fail to see these facts. These scriptures definitely PROVE – absolutely – that Jesus Christ did have brothers and sisters who were the children of His mother. Their father was Joseph. Joseph was the legal, not actual, father of Jesus. This means that Jesus and His brothers and sisters had the same mother, but not the same father.
Excellent points–View attachment 3953
 
HI, All

What is truth"? That question was asked of Jesus Christ by Pontius Pilate in John 18:38.
Truth is a person, and that person is Jesus Christ. John 14:6, Ephesians 1:13,4:21
Since there is only one Jesus Christ, it stands to reason that there can be only one truth. John 17:17-19.
Since He IS truth, then His Word is truth. John 17:17
In fact, He IS “The Word”. John 1:1
Therefore, we know that something is true if, and because He said it.
We also know something is true if Holy Scripture had said it elsewhere, since the books within it were inspired by the Holy Spirit.Simple, isn’t ?

Nowhere in the bible does it say that the Mother of Jesus had other children why do so many insist she did.

What is very interesting in all the posts all over these forums in general have I ever seen any but Catholics and Orthodox call Mary blessed as God the Father did through the Angel Gabriel LK 1: 28

Mary is the only person in the entire bible to be called blessed.
Without a doubt by God.

Like any good son Jesus will defend His Mother from detractors.

Luke 1:
48 for he has regarded the low estate of his handmaiden. For behold, henceforth all ]generations will call me blessed;
49 for he who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name.
50 And his mercy is on those who fear him from generation to generation

I believe the use of the word all in scripture is a command if my memory serves me right.

Peace, OneNow1
 
Hi everyone! Here’s my (name removed by moderator)ut to this.

WHEN Jesus came to His own hometown synagogue to preach, he astonished the people with His teachings. In their amazement, they asked, “Whence hath THIS man this wisdom, and these mighty works? Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not ALL with us?” (Matt. 13:54-56).

Notice it!

This scripture clearly states that Christ had FOUR brothers, all of them being personally named. The added question, “And his sisters, are they not ALL with us?” implies that He had AT LEAST THREE SISTERS. If He had only two, they would have used the term, “both,” instead of “all.”

Some claim that these were not really brothers and sisters, only cousins. But Scripture reveals this is NOT TRUE.

Here is the proof.

The word “brethren” is translated from the Greek word for “brother” – “adelphos.” This word may mean a spiritual brother, but it does not mean “cousin.”

The English word “cousin” in Luke 1:36 and 58 is translated from “suggenes” in the original Greek. This clearly shows that the New Testament, when referring to Jesus’ family, makes them brothers and not cousins.
Code:
                        Not Spiritual Brothers
What about the contention that these were Christ’s spiritual brothers and sisters, instead of His blood brothers and sisters – His siblings?

We find the answer in John 2:12. Christ went to Capernaum, accompanied by “His mother, and His brethren, AND HIS DISCIPLES.”

Here we find a sharp distinction is made between His BRETHREN and His DISCIPLES showing that they WERE NOT the same. His SPIRITUAL brethren WERE His disciples – those who believed His teachings. His flesh and blood brothers did not believe Him (John 7:5). This scripture certainly makes James, Joses, Simon and Judas His blood brothers.

In Mark’s account of Jesus’ visit to His hometown synagogue, we find the people wondering about His great wisdom. They asked, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us?” (Mark 6:3).

These people, who had known Jesus from childhood, specifically stated that He was the brother of several other young people who had grown up in their midst. These people were VERY familiar with family relationships throughout the village. Notice that they are not called cousins, but brothers.
Code:
                    Mary Not a Perpetual Virgin
Mary did not stay a virgin throughout her life as Matthew was inspired to write that, Joseph “took unto him his wife: And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son…” (Mat. 1:24-25). Notice that Joseph “knew her not” only while Mary was with child. In other words, after that time – after the child’s birth – Joseph “knew her.”
Code:
                          Christ the "Firstborn"
In Matthew 1:25 we find that Christ is called the “FIRSTBORN” son of Mary. The word “firstborn” is translated from the Greek word, “prototokon” which means the firstborn among other children – the oldest of several children in a family. If Jesus had been Mary’s ONLY child, the Greek word “monogenes,” meaning “only child,” would have been used in the original Greek text. Jesus was the “only begotten” human son of the Heavenly Father (John 1:18). But He was the “first born” – not an “only child” – of Mary!

Many other New Testament scriptures tell us distinctly that Jesus Christ was not the only child of His mother.

In Galatians 1:18-19, Paul mentioned having seen not only Peter, but also James the Lord’s brother in Jerusalem. We know that Paul was speaking of a brother in the flesh. If he had been speaking of a spiritual brother – a brother in the faith – he certainly would have included Peter among Christ’s spiritual brethren. But he did not!

Paul knew that Christ had other brothers. He stated: “Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the BRETHREN OF THE LORD, and Cephas [Peter]?” (I Cor. 9:5). Notice that the brethren of the Lord are distinct from the twelve apostles. In Acts 1:13-14 we find that THE DISCIPLES “continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, AND WITH HIS BRETHREN.”

Some have, in argument, referred to Matthew 12:46-50. Here Christ said, “Whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.” They have claimed this scripture as proof that when the Bible speaks of Christ’s brethren, it means spiritual brethren. They claim therefore that He may not have had any brothers in the flesh. Such an argument is without foundation. If this scripture proved that Christ had no brothers or sisters, IT WOULD ALSO PROVE THAT HE HAD NO MOTHER. What Christ meant in this statement is that those who OBEY THE FATHER are all equally precious in His sight, regardless of blood relationship.

The author is a certain J.W. Robinson. I added the part titled “Mary Not a Perpetual Virgin.”
👍 excellent job!!

Perhaps you can offer your thoughts on the job I did with the Catholic idea that Mary is a “type” for the Ark (link here).
 
Luke 1:
48 for he has regarded the low estate of his handmaiden. For behold, henceforth all ]generations will call me blessed;
49 for he who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name.
50 And his mercy is on those who fear him from generation to generation

I believe the use of the word all in scripture is a command if my memory serves me right.
Hi! I found another text that uses the word “blessed” (Greek, makarizo- pronounce fortunate, call happy). It’s in James 5:11.

“Take, my brethren, for example of suffering evil, of labour and patience, the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord. Behold, we account them blessed who have endured. You have heard of the patience of Job and you have seen the end of the Lord, that the Lord is merciful and compassionate” (James 5:10-11- Douay-Rheims).

God bless.
 
Hi everyone! Here’s my (name removed by moderator)ut to this.

WHEN Jesus came to His own hometown synagogue to preach, he astonished the people with His teachings. In their amazement, they asked, “Whence hath THIS man this wisdom, and these mighty works? Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not ALL with us?” (Matt. 13:54-56).

Notice it!

This scripture clearly states that Christ had FOUR brothers, all of them being personally named. The added question, “And his sisters, are they not ALL with us?” implies that He had AT LEAST THREE SISTERS. If He had only two, they would have used the term, “both,” instead of “all.”

Some claim that these were not really brothers and sisters, only cousins. But Scripture reveals this is NOT TRUE.

Here is the proof.

The word “brethren” is translated from the Greek word for “brother” – “adelphos.” This word may mean a spiritual brother, but it does not mean “cousin.”

The English word “cousin” in Luke 1:36 and 58 is translated from “suggenes” in the original Greek. This clearly shows that the New Testament, when referring to Jesus’ family, makes them brothers and not cousins.
Code:
                        Not Spiritual Brothers
What about the contention that these were Christ’s spiritual brothers and sisters, instead of His blood brothers and sisters – His siblings?

We find the answer in John 2:12. Christ went to Capernaum, accompanied by “His mother, and His brethren, AND HIS DISCIPLES.”

Here we find a sharp distinction is made between His BRETHREN and His DISCIPLES showing that they WERE NOT the same. His SPIRITUAL brethren WERE His disciples – those who believed His teachings. His flesh and blood brothers did not believe Him (John 7:5). This scripture certainly makes James, Joses, Simon and Judas His blood brothers.

In Mark’s account of Jesus’ visit to His hometown synagogue, we find the people wondering about His great wisdom. They asked, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Judas, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us?” (Mark 6:3).

These people, who had known Jesus from childhood, specifically stated that He was the brother of several other young people who had grown up in their midst. These people were VERY familiar with family relationships throughout the village. Notice that they are not called cousins, but brothers.
Code:
                    Mary Not a Perpetual Virgin
Mary did not stay a virgin throughout her life as Matthew was inspired to write that, Joseph “took unto him his wife: And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son…” (Mat. 1:24-25). Notice that Joseph “knew her not” only while Mary was with child. In other words, after that time – after the child’s birth – Joseph “knew her.”
Code:
                          Christ the "Firstborn"
In Matthew 1:25 we find that Christ is called the “FIRSTBORN” son of Mary. The word “firstborn” is translated from the Greek word, “prototokon” which means the firstborn among other children – the oldest of several children in a family. If Jesus had been Mary’s ONLY child, the Greek word “monogenes,” meaning “only child,” would have been used in the original Greek text. Jesus was the “only begotten” human son of the Heavenly Father (John 1:18). But He was the “first born” – not an “only child” – of Mary!

Many other New Testament scriptures tell us distinctly that Jesus Christ was not the only child of His mother.

In Galatians 1:18-19, Paul mentioned having seen not only Peter, but also James the Lord’s brother in Jerusalem. We know that Paul was speaking of a brother in the flesh. If he had been speaking of a spiritual brother – a brother in the faith – he certainly would have included Peter among Christ’s spiritual brethren. But he did not!

Paul knew that Christ had other brothers. He stated: “Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the BRETHREN OF THE LORD, and Cephas [Peter]?” (I Cor. 9:5). Notice that the brethren of the Lord are distinct from the twelve apostles. In Acts 1:13-14 we find that THE DISCIPLES “continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, AND WITH HIS BRETHREN.”

Some have, in argument, referred to Matthew 12:46-50. Here Christ said, “Whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.” They have claimed this scripture as proof that when the Bible speaks of Christ’s brethren, it means spiritual brethren. They claim therefore that He may not have had any brothers in the flesh. Such an argument is without foundation. If this scripture proved that Christ had no brothers or sisters, IT WOULD ALSO PROVE THAT HE HAD NO MOTHER. What Christ meant in this statement is that those who OBEY THE FATHER are all equally precious in His sight, regardless of blood relationship.

The author is a certain J.W. Robinson. I added the part titled “Mary Not a Perpetual Virgin.”
very well said.
 
Mary is the only person in the entire bible to be called blessed.
Without a doubt by God.
I think you better go back and read your Bible. You obviously missed the several people that were called blessed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top