Hillary Clinton Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cider
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I already explained my position.
It is your choice whether or not you chose to ignore those answers.

As it stands, I did take the time to discover many people here, like Trump, believe that women who abort are murderers and need to be punished as murderers.

And, for those who support Democrats, like Trump has done, I take that response about as seriously as I take Trump when he says anything.
I often wonder if anyone worries about CAF losing its credibility.
 
Just because one thinks that people who hire hitmen, even hitmen with white coats, ought to be punished, this does not imply that they are arguing for voting for democrats. To argue that people who arrange murder should be punished is a pro-life position. To believe such does not make one pro-death in any way.
Thanks for the information.

It has nothing to do with the post that you are responding to though.
 
Thanks for the information.

It has nothing to do with the post that you are responding to though.
It has everything to do with it, because there are those who would want to imply that if you think murderers ought to be punished, then that somehow suggests that you are not pro-life.
 
It has everything to do with it, because there are those who would want to imply that if you think murderers ought to be punished, then that somehow suggests that you are not pro-life.
I don’t think it does at all.

What I have seen, and have said myself, is that generally one does not see prolifers arguing to punish women who have had abortions. One more commonly sees that argued by people who want to keep abortion on demand. Not that I think they’re serious. I think it is sometimes used as a pro-abortion argument to cause fear in the ill-informed and cause them to vote for the abortion party.

Not saying you share that. If you truly believe in prosecuting women who have had abortions, then I’m prepared to believe you, notwithstanding that I do not share the sentiment.
 
It has everything to do with it, because there are those who would want to imply that if you think murderers ought to be punished, then that somehow suggests that you are not pro-life.
I agree with you. I do not believe in abortion, but I think the women should incur some punishment, on a case-by-case basis, if abortion were illegal.
 
Bill Clinton’s comments to Black Lives Matter protesters provoke fierce Internet backlash cbsn.ws/1S0t3hz
Why would he say something that he has to know will irritate some of his wife’s strongest supporters?

It doesn’t make sense, as his bashing of the President lately doesn’t make sense.

You gotta wonder if he e-knows something.😃
 
Again, nope. In the case of the death penalty almost every single “victim” is guilty. In the case of abortion, every victim is innocent.
But obviously every person convicted of a crime is not guilty. So are you saying that it’s acceptable for a few innocent people to be mistakenly put to death (and some certainly have been) because most people who are sentenced to death are guilty?
 
But obviously every person convicted of a crime is not guilty. So are you saying that it’s acceptable for a few innocent people to be mistakenly put to death (and some certainly have been) because most people who are sentenced to death are guilty?
I am opposed to the death penalty (as long as a life sentence is a life sentence). 😉

The death penalty is bad; abortion is far worse.
 
Senator Sanders says that for a variety of reasons, Hillary Clinton is not qualified to be president of the USA.
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/bernie-sanders-says-hillary-clinton-is-not-qualified-to-be-president-of-the-united-states-a6972526.html
Sanders:
““Let me just say in response to Secretary Clinton, I don’t believe that she is qualified if she is, through her super PAC taking tens of millions of dollars in special interest funds. I don’t think you are qualified if you have voted for the disastrous war in Iraq. I don’t think you are qualified if you supported the Panama free trade agreement.”
Of course, based on these standards, most Democrats and Republicans would not be qualified to be president. Almost all the candidates besides Sanders are benefiting from PACs, more than three quarters of the members of Congress voted for the Iraq War and most of them support free trade agreements.
 
Why would he say something that he has to know will irritate some of his wife’s strongest supporters?

It doesn’t make sense, as his bashing of the President lately doesn’t make sense.

You gotta wonder if he e-knows something.😃
Maybe he really doesn’t want to go back to the white house: restriction of freedom?
 
And yet Pope Francis says while Catholics are not to follow their egos, neither are their consciences to be “remote controlled”. So maybe it’s not as clear as some might think.

news.va/en/news/pope-francis-sunday-angelus-full-text-2
Yes we are seeing a lot of Democrat Catholics follow their egos. I prefer, like Francis, to follow the teachings of the Church. I also agree with Francis that our conscience should not be remote controlled-it should be well formed by the teachings of the Church.
 
I don’t think it does at all.

What I have seen, and have said myself, is that generally one does not see prolifers arguing to punish women who have had abortions. One more commonly sees that argued by people who want to keep abortion on demand. Not that I think they’re serious. I think it is sometimes used as a pro-abortion argument to cause fear in the ill-informed and cause them to vote for the abortion party.

Not saying you share that. If you truly believe in prosecuting women who have had abortions, then I’m prepared to believe you, notwithstanding that I do not share the sentiment.
It’s truly difficult to accept the “official” anti-choice stance that women who have an abortion are murdering a baby, but that this type of murder should be treated differently than other types of child murder, a subject that usually brings out the pitchforks!

Anyone can see the abject logical failure of this position - and it undermines the entire movement.

Trump, a man who has clearly not spent much time contemplating the politics of abortion, chose a quick logical path when he was put on the hot seat. That logic earned him near universal scorn from both sides of the issue. 🤷

I actually appreciate Trump’s acknowledgement that woman have agency over their bodies and their decisions. The anti-choice movement grants women no such respect.

At the very least, such mental gymnastics treat women like idiots - we’re somehow stupid enough to be coerced into murder so we must be saved from our own bad decisions. At the worst, it is blind to the way justice works in the US of A. When the State of Florida uncovered evidence that Casey Anthony killed her toddler, the State of Florida did not respond with mercy.

And can you imagine a world where every pregnancy needed to be investigated by law enforcement?! :eek:

Because of Trump’s honesty (and the Supreme Court seats that are in play in the future), I believe that the abortion issue will play a key role in the 2016 Presidential race and I don’t think that’s good news for people who want to see a Republican candidate advance to the White House. My opinion only, of course.
 
It’s truly difficult to accept the “official” anti-choice stance that women who have an abortion are murdering a baby, but that this type of murder should be treated differently than other types of child murder, a subject that usually brings out the pitchforks!

Anyone can see the abject logical failure of this position - and it undermines the entire movement.

Trump, a man who has clearly not spent much time contemplating the politics of abortion, chose a quick logical path when he was put on the hot seat. That logic earned him near universal scorn from both sides of the issue. 🤷

I actually appreciate Trump’s acknowledgement that woman have agency over their bodies and their decisions. The anti-choice movement grants women no such respect.

At the very least, such mental gymnastics treat women like idiots - we’re somehow stupid enough to be coerced into murder so we must be saved from our own bad decisions. At the worst, it is blind to the way justice works in the US of A. When the State of Florida uncovered evidence that Casey Anthony killed her toddler, the State of Florida did not respond with mercy.

And can you imagine a world where every pregnancy needed to be investigated by law enforcement?! :eek:

Because of Trump’s honesty (and the Supreme Court seats that are in play in the future), I believe that the abortion issue will play a key role in the 2016 Presidential race and I don’t think that’s good news for people who want to see a Republican candidate advance to the White House. My opinion only, of course.
Stinkat:

Meaning no offense to you, but referencing Post # 1650, I rest my case. :rotfl::rotfl:
 
Stinkat:

Meaning no offense to you, but referencing Post # 1650, I rest my case. :rotfl::rotfl:
We have Entered the twilight zone. Suddenly abortion supporters are arguing that women must be punished for murder and that every pregnancy must be investigated . The reason this hysteria is so funny is that we don’t have to guess how things would be if abortion was illegal this was theb status quo in United States before Roe was imposed on the country . No women went to jail and No every pregnancy wasn’t investigated . In Fact the main difference we saw was abortions increased about 1 million per year
 
It has everything to do with it, because there are those who would want to imply that if you think murderers ought to be punished, then that somehow suggests that you are not pro-life.
Again that has to do with “those who would want to imply that”, and nothing to do with anything that I either implied or wrote.
If you want to impose your own ideas on someone, impugn them on one of “those” who are actually doing that, rather than on me, who is doing no such thing.
 
We have Entered the twilight zone. Suddenly abortion supporters are arguing that women must be punished for murder and that every pregnancy must be investigated . The reason this hysteria is so funny is that we don’t have to guess how things would be if abortion was illegal this was theb status quo in United States before Roe was imposed on the country . No women went to jail and No every pregnancy wasn’t investigated . In Fact the main difference we saw was abortions increased about 1 million per year
Then why didn’t we see the corresponding drop in births?

It didn’t work before. Abortions were going on because those seeking the abortion feared no punishment.
 
Then why didn’t we see the corresponding drop in births?

It didn’t work before. Abortions were going on because those seeking the abortion feared no punishment.
They Did drop-significantly. About 7% between the early 60s when states first started approving abortions and 1975 after Roe was fully in effect . They were down over 10% from the late 50s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top