Article I Section 7 of the ConstitutionThe “Creator” espoused by the framers of the Declaration of Independence would be foreign to most conservative Christians and Catholics. The DoI is framed from a deist point of view, not a Christian point of view. Deism states that there is a Creator…but once the Creator set the universe in motion the Creator does not interfer in it’s working and management.
Government does not do business on sunday, that is because of the Christian Sabbath. If the Framers did not share a Christian worldview why would they have given recognition to this?If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it…
This is a reference to Jesus ChristDone in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names
Now that is a weird sentence. Do you like homosexuals and homosexual acts?They have rights now. They want specialness. They want to act wrongly and demand all affirm their wrongness as normal.
How is it weird? Contrived, made up, rights are not authentic at all.Now that is a weird sentence. Do you like homosexuals and homosexual acts?
Which is what exactly?The same way you describe heterosexuality as normal.
Who is suggesting they are? We make laws to enshrine rights. I know you know that.How is it weird? Contrived, made up, rights are not authentic at all.
They want affirmation above all else.You have no made your case. “Get over it” is not a valid argument.
I do not hate anyone. Yes, I hate sinful acts which include all homosexual acts.Who is suggesting they are? We make laws to enshrine rights. I know you know that.
But back to my other question - do you hate homosexuals and homosexual acts?
You should know what you think about the normalcy of heterosexuality. Telepathy is still in its infancy, so I can’t read your mindWhich is what exactly?
What is it about homosexual acts that you feel is sinful and worthy of hate.I do not hate anyone. Yes, I hate sinful acts which include all homosexual acts.
If you do not know my position how can you claim your position is the same?You should know what you think about the normalcy of heterosexuality. Telepathy is still in its infancy, so I can’t read your mind
In our country there are not performing, they will have the equal right of marriage.I do not hate anyone. Yes, I hate sinful acts which include all homosexual acts.
What right is their to perform pretend to be married?
They contradict the moral law. The contradict the natural law.What is it about homosexual acts that you feel is sinful and worthy of hate.
They will have an abuse of State power to allow an unjust activity.In our country there are not performing, they will have the equal right of marriage.
I am claiming your position should be the same.If you do not know my position how can you claim your position is the same?
It is not unjust. It will be legal.They will have an abuse of State power to allow an unjust activity.
Being legal does not make unjust things just.It is not unjust. It will be legal.
You are not making sense.I am claiming your position should be the same.
You are free to deny it. Basic philosophy will take you there.No such thing as ‘divine law’ it is a catholic affectation. Natural law does play a part in Jurisprudence.
It is impossible, by definition.The same way you describe heterosexuality as normal.
Apparently, Catholics can…and do.Blessed Pope John Paul ll said to Bishops in Los Angeles in 1987
rosary-center.org/ll46n4.htm
Catholics can not pick and choose what they agree with and what they do not