No, their DNA is not exactly the same.
Where is the evidence that suggest the animal kingdom is fraught with nothing but homosexuals? Because you suggest that with , “all the time,” and due to evidence I see all around me all the day long the animal world is populating itself through procreation quite well.I only deal in logic. When anyone demands that I prove a widely known fact that homosexual behavior is common in all animal species then he gets the ad hominems for being difficult.
I brought up the fact about the animal kingdom because they are also created male and female for a specific purpose and yet they engage in homosexual acts all the time, sometimes to ejaculation. It begs the question “Why”?
A-frickin’-menAnd you frankly speak drivel and the fact that you are probably shepherding souls to hell is hardly going to look good on your cv come judgment day. We should be charitable but when you have a Priest behaving like Judas you need to tell him to pipe down and warn him of Dante’s vision of hell which is populated by unfaithful priests right at the bottom.
This is confused in a few respects. First, EVEN IF homosexuality were entirely genetic, that would not make homosexuality normal. (Down’s Syndrome is not normal despite being a genetic defect.) Second, no one is doomed to hell for their genetic makeup. People are judged on the choices they make and the actions they take. Third, if you think the God you know is mis-described by the Apostle Paul and such saints as Augustine and Aquinas, you would be well advised to re-think your “knowledge.”
Do you have a source on which to base this statement. If so, please provide it.I only deal in logic. When anyone demands that I prove a widely known fact that homosexual behavior is common in all animal species then he gets the ad hominems for being difficult.
I brought up the fact about the animal kingdom because they are also created male and female for a specific purpose and yet they engage in homosexual acts all the time, sometimes to ejaculation. It begs the question “Why”?
Indeed, it is an embarassingly poor argument which is often seen on the Facebook pages and twitter of otherwise intelligent people.
Speaking of that, I have a good friend who is a special ed teacher with who went to Bryn Mawr for her bachelor’s and Columbia for her Master’s: yesterday she ‘shared’ on Facebook a cartoon with the caption, ‘Jesus had two dads and he turned out fine.’ Words fail…
It’s amazing how these ‘soi-disant’ ‘critical thinkers’ are like lemmings and all follow their indoctrination classes in their ivory towers. They are all churned out in the same way i.e. morally skewed and arrogant (even if on the face of it they are nice enough people).
I’m less amazed by this the older I get. And I think the reason for that is this. When people are wrong about the nature of reality and truth, of what it means to be a human person, then they all tend to run into the same intellectual ditch.
The very fact that it’s quite common in animal species is the key. To ignore that detail is cherry picking.
I “test” everything before I choose to agree with it. I do not blindly follow anyone or any group without putting every detail through the fire. That’s how I came to dispose of my Protestant faith in the first place. Since no definitive scientific proof has been found thus far to explain homosexuality then I use logic and reason with the brain God gave me. I choose to fully understand something before I can cast a judgement on it one way or another.
I’m showing homosexual behavior is common in the animal kingdom. You can ignore any facts you choose. I’m simply pointing out it happens. I suppose if you choose to ignore evidence then you can always convince yourself your right though.
Grow up? So you condone a person insulting your intelligence by demanding proof for a well-known fact, as “fringe” as it may be to you? I simply pointed out a detail that hadn’t been brought up. Sorry but I don’t say things because of some need to “feel important”.
Please cite a credible source for this claim. I grew up on a farm. There was nothing common about animal homosexuality that I ever witnessed. Ignoring red herrings is a necessity of solid logic.
But what evidence? Share it please.I’m showing homosexual behavior is common in the animal kingdom. You can ignore any facts you choose. I’m simply pointing out it happens. I suppose if you choose to ignore evidence then you can always convince yourself your right though.
I do not understand the animal kingdom argument. If I witness a chimpanzee take the bananas of another chimpanzee, does that mean stealing should be ok? Where do you draw the line?I’m showing homosexual behavior is common in the animal kingdom. You can ignore any facts you choose. I’m simply pointing out it happens. I suppose if you choose to ignore evidence then you can always convince yourself your right though.
The only person that thinks it’s a fact is you.
Therefore “fringe.”
Apparently if some behavior occurs it must be acceptable simple because it occurs.
