You’re not holding to the morality of a given act being dictated by law, are you?
What this comes down to is that it is morally wrong for a brother and sister to marry each other solely because their kids might have birth defects…?? Are you honestly comfortable with that position?
What if they agreed before getting married to have themselves sterilized? Big old green light? Two thumbs up?
How easily some would respond to such a difficult scenario with no more than “incest is wrong.” Is it? It certainly does have its downside: genetic defects, for instance. Then again, evolution itself is a tangled family web. Regardless of its morality, for these two individuals, who are in such a difficult position… how can we really expect them to respond? “Stop loving one another”? Can we really be so heartlessly objective, so apathetic to what would without doubt be an infinitely trying experience, emotionally and otherwise?
This thread has me more than a little disgusted, I’ll confess. The pathological origins of same-sex attraction are largely unknown. All we do know from recent scientific studies is that genetic factors probably do pay a significant role–certainly not a negligible one–in the development of sexual identity (to what extent is another question entirely). Environmental conditions and subjective experience do play a role, as well: however, to equate this with “homosexuality as a choice” is simple fallacy. All of these factors influence, without doubt, one’s unique sexual identity, but do so almost on an entirely unconscious level.
And yes, call it what you like: there are numerous animals (especially in mammals) that also experience a form of SSA and attempt to mate with creatures of the same gender. It is not unheard of.
To simply pass this off as an “objective disorder”–how subjective the sources of such accusations!–is perhaps only to fear the otherwise inevitable conclusion: it is a
part of the natural order. Its origins do not lie in humanity’s “depravity.”
One can talk about “cures” and “treatments” for such, and in doing so only unveil a saddening (and immense) ignorance. Growing up in a fundamentalist church, being exposed to the prejudice and bigotry of these “God-fearing” men, I was forever isolated by my condition. I wanted so desperately to be “normal”; but why would I want to deny this part of myself? This capacity for genuine and sincere love, so beautifully exemplified through Our Lord’s loving sacrifice, and through the touching narrative of David and Jonathan’s encounters which I came to know so well? I didn’t want to become heterosexual. I just wanted my friends to still love me. I went to conversion therapy. I loved it, if only because I was luckily placed with an open-minded therapist and it gave me someone to talk to about my “condition.” Of course it didn’t “straighten” me out… In fact, twice at later dates I attempted suicide. Why bother to live when no one seems capable of loving you just as you are–when you are so very, utterly alone? When you are, beyond hope of repair, “objectively disordered”?
Finally, I began understanding, first through the support of new friends (Catholic, wouldn’t’cha know!), that I had nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to excise. I also began realizing how deep the psychic damage inflicted when one is so set on denying and suppressing such a powerful and deeply imbedded inner reality. I want to be wholly me, as God made me. To live within the context of my own true Self.
Perhaps we all need a lesson in the area of being more genuine, starting with how to be honest with ourselves. But I for one simply cannot live in a ruse, forever denying and exiling what I know to be a powerful truth about myself.
Having come through the torment of living out a false self, seeing comments like these–so devoid of understanding in this area, mostly simply through lack of experience–is painful. There’s still so much progress to be made. Still so many things in need of realization by decided minds.