Hostility towards Latin

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmccpy78
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We are not talking about the New Testament. We are talking about the Mass.
In our Latin Rite, the original text of our Mass is in Latin.
I am very tired of the hostility shown toward the official language of our Rite for the last forty five years, primarily by so many of our bishops, including my own bishop and many of the clergy.
I just want to have one Latin Mass, TLM or Novus Ordo, with Catholic music every Sunday in just one of the eight Catholic churches within a hour’s drive of my home.
I have totally had it with the banal, modernistic tripe we have been putting up with at our Masses for way too long.
I don’t know where you live in Oregon. But you yourself told me there is a TLM Mass in Portland or Eugene. Salem has a Latin NO Mass once a month. Why they don’t have more at that parish I don’t know…maybe because they have Spanish Masses and Vietnamese Masses.
 
I don’t know where you live in Oregon. But you yourself told me there is a TLM Mass in Portland or Eugene. Salem has a Latin NO Mass once a month. Why they don’t have more at that parish I don’t know…maybe because they have Spanish Masses and Vietnamese Masses.
Yup.
…but contrary to popular belief, a lot of us live a long way from the I-5 Ptld-Salem-Eugene corridor, myself included.
At least I can make the trip in less than a day, unlike some of the folks in the far eastern part of the state.
It would really be nice to have a Latin Mass with authentically Catholic music within a three hour or so round trip.
 
Yup.
…but contrary to popular belief, a lot of us live a long way from the I-5 Ptld-Salem-Eugene corridor, myself included.
At least I can make the trip in less than a day, unlike some of the folks in the far eastern part of the state.
It would really be nice to have a Latin Mass with authentically Catholic music within a three hour or so round trip.
Ok–but doesnt that make the hostility towards being unable to find a Latin Mass a little different in a sparsly populated area then in a metropolitan area? I’m just asking 🤷
 
Ok–but doesnt that make the hostility towards being unable to find a Latin Mass a little different in a sparsly populated area then in a metropolitan area? I’m just asking 🤷
The hostility toward the Latin Liturgy is not entirely dependent on size of the community.
For quite awhile there was no Latin Mass in the entire Seattle diocese.
Some northwestern bishops have made no secret of their dislike for any Latin Liturgy. In the '60s through the '80s I have had several clergy and nuns tell me that the use of Latin in the Mass was “outlawed”. I don’t know if they were just mistaken or outright lying. If they were mistaken, someone else had to have told them that it was “outlawed”.
 
The hostility toward the Latin Liturgy is not entirely dependent on size of the community.
For quite awhile there was no Latin Mass in the entire Seattle diocese.
Some northwestern bishops have made no secret of their dislike for any Latin Liturgy. In the '60s through the '80s I have had several clergy and nuns tell me that the use of Latin in the Mass was “outlawed”. I don’t know if they were just mistaken or outright lying. If they were mistaken, someone else had to have told them that it was “outlawed”.
This trend seems to have followed the secular world:

education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2160/Latin-in-Schools-Teaching.html
 
The hostility toward the Latin Liturgy is not entirely dependent on size of the community.
For quite awhile there was no Latin Mass in the entire Seattle diocese.
Some northwestern bishops have made no secret of their dislike for any Latin Liturgy. In the '60s through the '80s I have had several clergy and nuns tell me that the use of Latin in the Mass was “outlawed”. I don’t know if they were just mistaken or outright lying. If they were mistaken, someone else had to have told them that it was “outlawed”.
I’m not saying that there isn’t a hostility…although it might be a preference without being hostile.

My point being that if you can’t find a Latin Mass in the entire Seattle diocese, then it’s much more likely that there is a biasis there then if you can’t find a Latin Mass in Pendelton.

Maybe they were mistaken and misunderstood what someone said…🤷
 
Good article. I would imagine right now with the economy…they are struggling to teach the basis…let alone Latin.🤷

But…it sounds like there will not be enough qualified teachers when/if the economy improves.

In high school…I didn’t want to take Latin…I figured what the heck am I going to use it for? Spanish seemed much more productive/usable.
 
Bringing Back Latin

An interest take.

An excerpt:
…why does all this matter? Just as the academy and the educated world outgrew Latin, why not allow the Church to do the same? I respond that, even if, Deo gratias, the Church should encompass the globe and become literally catholic in language and culture, and even if, Deus vetet, the Catholic Church in Europe should wither on the vine, it would still be true that the vast majority of Roman Catholic culture and tradition grew up and was formed speaking Latin. It is, as it were, the native language of the Roman Catholic Church, and were we to let it die we would in fact suffer the loss of our mother tongue. We would have access to our patrimony, that wonder-filled treasury that now lays unseen in the Church’s attic, only in bits and pieces and then only in translation. We would become foreigners to our own tradition, to our own thoughts. This is a potentially grievous loss for a Church that holds Tradition sacred. Both Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI have recently reminded us that the Church needs Latin for this very reason.
 
The hostility toward the Latin Liturgy is not entirely dependent on size of the community.
For quite awhile there was no Latin Mass in the entire Seattle diocese.
Some northwestern bishops have made no secret of their dislike for any Latin Liturgy. In the '60s through the '80s I have had several clergy and nuns tell me that the use of Latin in the Mass was “outlawed”. I don’t know if they were just mistaken or outright lying. If they were mistaken, someone else had to have told them that it was “outlawed”.
That hostility isn’t regional by any means. There were clergy and religious sisters elsewhere who said the exact same thing. I can personally attest to three Archdioceses and several more Dioceses (North East, Midwest, South East) where that happened. While those people certainly were mistaken, they weren’t exactly lying: I think that in their misguided zeal to push their post-conciliar agenda down everyone’s throat they actually believed what they were spouting.
 
That hostility isn’t regional by any means. There were clergy and religious sisters elsewhere who said the exact same thing. I can personally attest to three Archdioceses and several more Dioceses (North East, Midwest, South East) where that happened. While those people certainly were mistaken, they weren’t exactly lying: I think that in their misguided zeal to push their post-conciliar agenda down everyone’s throat they actually believed what they were spouting.
Yup. It was rammed down my throat and I haven’t stopped gagging on it for the last forty five years.
Somewhere, somebody(ies) started the lie.
There were good priests removed from parish work and other good priests marginalized and threatened because they wouldn’t go along with the modernist agenda. I personally knew four of them.
 
I believe that there are two different reasons for preserving Latin in the Roman Church. One has validity and the other does not.

Valid: To preserve Latin because it is part of our common heritage as Roman Catholics or better said, it’s part of Roman Catholic culture.

Invalid: It is necessary for communication.

I think my first point speaks for itself and need not be explained. Allow me to explain my second point. Let’s look at the big four in the Roman Catholic Church: Jesuits, Salesians, Franciscans and Dominicans. The total number of men and women who belong to these families are in the millions. They do not use Latin as a means of communication, even though they have men and women on every continent and from every language group. Yet, each of these institutes has its own constitutions, General Chapters, statutes, missals, lectionaries, breviaries (they do not use the Roman missal, Roman lectionary, nor the Roman breviary).

They do not find that they have communication problem with their confreres or sisters. They are simply grouped by languages for the purposes of doing business, enacting legislation, studying theology, studying their heritage and planning their future. When they gather in a General Chapter they use Italian with simultaneous translations. They do not use Latin.

When writing the constitutions we have always written the first edition in Latin and then translated it into the local languages. The writings of the founders are rarely in Latin. Most of them wrote in their native language and later had them translated. I know that Francis wrote in Italian, French and the rule in Latin. Ignatius wrote in Spanish. John Bosco wrote in Italian. I’m not sure what language Dominic used.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
They do not find that they have communication problem with their confreres or sisters. They are simply grouped by languages for the purposes of doing business, enacting legislation, studying theology, studying their heritage and planning their future. When they gather in a General Chapter they use Italian with simultaneous translations. They do not use Latin.

When writing the constitutions we have always written the first edition in Latin and then translated it into the local languages. The writings of the founders are rarely in Latin. Most of them wrote in their native language and later had them translated. I know that Francis wrote in Italian, French and the rule in Latin. Ignatius wrote in Spanish. John Bosco wrote in Italian. I’m not sure what language Dominic used.
This may be true. But Fr. Foster, the Pope’s own Latinist, translates the important documents into Latin for preservation, if nothing else. Since Vatican II, according to that article I presented earlier, where everyone thought in Latin, there has been a trend to use languages like Italian and French to write one’s thoughts into that language first. Comes with disuse of Latin, I would imagine. Of course languages as the ones you’ve mentioned, Italian, Spanish, and other Romance languages are vulgarized forms of Latin to begin with so translations between them and the Latin wouldn’t be as difficult, I’m almost sure, as English and Latin, for example.
 
This may be true. But Fr. Foster, the Pope’s own Latinist, translates the important documents into Latin for preservation. Since Vatican II, according to that article I presented earlier, where everyone thought in Latin, there has been a trend to use languages like Italian and French to write one’s thoughts into that language first. Comes with disuse of Latin, I would imagine. Of course languages as the ones you’ve mentioned, Italian, Spanish, and other Romantic languages are vulgarized forms of Latin to begin with so translations between them and the Latin wouldn’t be as difficult, I would imagine, as English and Latin, for example.
English to Latin is more difficult than Spanish to Latin. This is true. But it’s done. Yes, everything is filed away in Latin. Notice that I said that the first draft of the constitutions are alwasy in Latin. That’s not for the sake of communication. It’s for the sake of culture. I have never had to read our constitutions in Latin, always in the language of the country where I was stationed. When I was in the Amazon, we had a General Chapter. Because we are an international order, the General Chapter is always held in Assisi. The discussions are never in Latin. They have never been, even when St. Francis was alive. When he was alive, they were always in French, because Italy did not have a unified Italian language.

There were always scribes to take notes and write them in Latin. The same is true today. However, when I was in South America, the constitutions had to be edited before the final draft was presented to Pope John Paul II. The final edition presented to him was in Latin. The copy that I read was in Quichua, which was the language of the friars in the Amazon. I was in the minority, because there were few Americans and Canadians there, most were indigenous friars and they refuse to us European languages. They rather burn :eek:

I’m exagerating about the burning, but they do have a knee-jerk reaction when forced to use Spanish, even though most countries in South America use either Spanish or Protugese. Givent he facility that we had to translate into Quichua, we did not have to pull out the fire extinguishers. 😛

That’s what I mean when I say that it’s valid to keep the Latin for the sake of culture. It’s not valid to claim that it helps in communication. We have the means to communicate in many languages and I’m not talking about a few people. The big four are very large. The Franciscan family alone has over 20 obediences and 1.7 million members. The Salesians have 20th priests alone, then there are the brothers, sisters and nuns. The same for the Dominicans. The Jebbies are about 18,000. Our communication problems stem not from language, but from differences in nuance and perspectives. That has alwasy existed, even when we had just Latin.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Yesterday was my parish’s annual picnic. I was having a conversation with my pastor and the topic of Latin in the new mass came up. He said that he would like to use Latin in parts of the mass at our parish but he just is not able to do it. He referenced to an occasion when he used one line of Latin during the mass and a woman stood up and shouted at him.😦 This worries me because we are a relatively orthodox parish with many women who still where lace head coverings and practice devotions before mass. I did not know how to respond to this. This upset me because he mentioned that he would like to restore more traditions (chant, incense, ect.) but it just would not be possible with the attitude of our parishioners. Is this a problem most parishes are faced with? What could our parish overcome these types of problems?
I had asked my Catholic priest if he would ever be able to celebrate a Latin Mass at our parish even if it was just a one time event thing and he told me that he would have nothing to do with it. Instead he gave me a name of a Church thats close by to where I live that says the Latin Mass. So I now go to the Latin Mass on Sundays and on Saturdays I go to the new Mass. One of his reasons for not wanting to say a Latin Mass is because he said nobody in the parish will no what hes saying and the parishoners wouldn’t be participating in the Latin Mass as much as the do in the new Mass.
 
I had asked my Catholic priest if he would ever be able to celebrate a Latin Mass at our parish even if it was just a one time event thing and he told me that he would have nothing to do with it. Instead he gave me a name of a Church thats close by to where I live that says the Latin Mass. So I now go to the Latin Mass on Sundays and on Saturdays I go to the new Mass. One of his reasons for not wanting to say a Latin Mass is because he said nobody in the parish will no what hes saying and the parishoners wouldn’t be participating in the Latin Mass as much as the do in the new Mass.
Father has a legitimate concern in this sense. There are many parishioners who do not want to attend a mass in Latin. I have a very good friend who is the pastor of a parish with about 3,000 families, not people. He has seven masses every weekend: two on Sat and five on Sun. The Church is full. It holds about 800. We had this conversation and he said something that made sense. He told me that his parishioners were there for mass. They are involved in over 37 ministries. They have paid off the mortgage for their new school… At this point in time, what would it add to the life of his parish to introduce a mass in Latin unless there was a large enough group for it. He also shared that he has had four requests in one year. If your parishioners are doing well and your parish is spiritually healthy, I say, don’t tamper with it.

I should add that this was a parish that resented being handed over to a group of brothers with just one priest. They have six brothers and only one of those brothers is a priest. They “rent” priests from the local Catholic college to come on Sats and Suns. The rest of the week, they have only one priest, three theologians, one psychologist, and one educator. These make up the six brothers. They thought it would be catastrophic when they lost their three priests and were given over to religious.

One would have to look at the good in the parish that Father may be trying to protect.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
This may be true. But Fr. Foster, the Pope’s own Latinist, translates the important documents into Latin for preservation, if nothing else. Since Vatican II, according to that article I presented earlier, where everyone thought in Latin, there has been a trend to use languages like Italian and French to write one’s thoughts into that language first. Comes with disuse of Latin, I would imagine. Of course languages as the ones you’ve mentioned, Italian, Spanish, and other Romance languages are vulgarized forms of Latin to begin with so translations between them and the Latin wouldn’t be as difficult, I’m almost sure, as English and Latin, for example.
But if the Pope writes it in a language other than Latin, wouldn’t translating it into Latin also pose the same dangers as translating Latin into any other language? Shouldn’t we preserve it in its original language written instead?
 
But if the Pope writes it in a language other than Latin, wouldn’t translating it into Latin also pose the same dangers as translating Latin into any other language? Shouldn’t we preserve it in its original language written instead?
My understanding is that when a document prepared in the vernacular is translated into Latin, the resulting Latin text is declared to be normative, and occasionally the version in the original language will be revised to accord with it if the translation into Latin has caused changes in meaning.
 
My understanding is that when a document prepared in the vernacular is translated into Latin, the resulting Latin text is declared to be normative, and occasionally the version in the original language will be revised to accord with it if the translation into Latin has caused changes in meaning.
Good to know. Thanks 👍
 
But if the Pope writes it in a language other than Latin, wouldn’t translating it into Latin also pose the same dangers as translating Latin into any other language? Shouldn’t we preserve it in its original language written instead?
What’s usually done in those cases is that you preserve both the original and the Latin translation. The purpose of having it in Latin is for the sake of containing all official writings in the official language of the Church. But you want to preserve the original for its historical value.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top