How are we saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJ59
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you take a look at Matt 20:22,23, you will see that baptism does not always mean water. Ralph
I don’t know about that. This is the NAB translation:
Jesus said in reply, “You do not know what you are asking. Can you drink the cup that I am going to drink?” They said to him, “We can.” He replied, “My cup you will indeed drink, but to sit at my right and at my left (, this) is not mine to give but is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.”
 
How do you come to the conclusion that he wasn’t water baptized? There is a discrete activity following the laying on of hands, isn’t there? He GOT UP AND was Baptized. This happened after the laying on of hands and after the scales fell from his eyes. Baptism has meant water baptism since the beginning. To deny it is to deny scripture.
PaulC What do you precisely mean above by a “discrete activity following the laying on hands, isn’t there”? Have you been filled with the Holy Spirit by the laying of hands? Love in Christ Ed
 
PaulC What do you precisely mean above by a “discrete activity following the laying on hands, isn’t there”? Have you been filled with the Holy Spirit by the laying of hands? Love in Christ Ed
I mean that in the Acts account, After the laying on of hands, he is baptized. The laying on of hands in not baptism. And yes, we are sealed with the gifts of the Holy spirit in Confirmation by the laying on of hands. This is different than Baptism, which is always water baptism.
 
PaulC What do you precisely mean above by a “discrete activity following the laying on hands, isn’t there”? Have you been filled with the Holy Spirit by the laying of hands? Love in Christ Ed
I think what he means, Ed, is that there are distinct and separate things going on in Acts 9 regarding Ananias and Saul, and regarding Christ’s power working on Saul.

Ananias was sent as an instrument of Christ to help Saul regain his sight. He was also sent to allow Saul to receive the Holy Spirit. Two distinct things.

Ananias first laid hands on Saul…and as a result, Saul regained his sight.

THEN Saul gets up and gets baptized.(a distinct event occurring AFTER regaining his sight through the laying on of hands)…as a result, Saul receives the Holy Spirit.

Your claim is that the laying on of hands both healed him and sealed him with the HS. Not true. Baptism seals the HS…this is why Saul GOT UP and WAS BAPTIZED after he regained his sight.
 
I think what he means, Ed, is that there are distinct and separate things going on in Acts 9 regarding Ananias and Saul, and regarding Christ’s power working on Saul.

Ananias was sent as an instrument of Christ to help Saul regain his sight. He was also sent to allow Saul to receive the Holy Spirit. Two distinct things.

Ananias first laid hands on Saul…and as a result, Saul regained his sight.

THEN Saul gets up and gets baptized.(a distinct event occurring AFTER regaining his sight through the laying on of hands)…as a result, Saul receives the Holy Spirit.

Your claim is that the laying on of hands both healed him and sealed him with the HS. Not true. Baptism seals the HS…this is why Saul GOT UP and WAS BAPTIZED after he regained his sight.
Hi Steve it’s good to hear from you again. Let’s start from the begining: Jesus tells Ananias that Paul sees in a vision, KJV “And hath seen in a vision a man named Annias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight”. (note Jesus said nothing about water baptism or Holy Spirit) Then Ananias tells Jesus he’s afraid of paul etc. Jesus tells him not to be etc. Now v17 Ananias meets Paul, KJV “Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be FILLED with the Holy Spirit”. Jesus didn’t say anything about baptism or Holy Spirit but Ananias knows that since Paul was already praying to Jesus he believed, was born again, so when he lays hands on him he will not only regain his sight but will be FILLED with the Holy Spirit. per Acts 8:17 KJV of v18,'And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales; and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized". v19 “And when he had received meat, he was strengthened”. I take v18 to mean that when Ananias laid hands (prayed) for Paul he got it all, scales removed, sight restored and was (baptized) FILLED with the Holy Spirit. Then because he was so weak he sat down to eat. Since Paul stayed in Damascus a few days, he probably was told about water baptism and was baptized. That’s why in Acts 22 his account differs from Acts 9. He doesn’t mentioned hands being laid on him, how he was filled with the Holy Spirit. He mentioned water baptism to confess his sins (repentance) to wash his sins away calling on Jesus to do it. Water baptism does not FILL with the Holy Spirit. Love in Christ Ed.
 
I mean that in the Acts account, After the laying on of hands, he is baptized. The laying on of hands in not baptism. And yes, we are sealed with the gifts of the Holy spirit in Confirmation by the laying on of hands. This is different than Baptism, which is always water baptism.
PaulC As per post 968 you haven’t answered my question as to what do you mean by “discrete activity following the laying of hands” What kind of activity are you speaking about? Give me Scripture reference. Why does Heb 6:2 speaks of baptisms plural can you name more than water baptism for me? In Christ Ed
 
John 3:5 Jesus answered: Amen, amen, I say to thee, unless a man be born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

Water - now why would Jesus say water if he didn’t mean water?
If its symbolic why didn’t He just say be baptised with the Holy Spirit
The Council of Carthage (200s) and fathers before and after link this verse to Baptism

Acts 8:35 Then Philip opened his mouth and, beginning with this scripture passage, he proclaimed Jesus to him.

36 As they traveled along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “Look, there is water. What is to prevent my being **baptised?” **

38 Then he ordered the chariot to stop, and Philip and the eunuch both went down into the water, and he** baptised **him.
The eunuch has this scripture explained to him by Phillip, it was about the death of Jesus at Calvary. When the eunuch understood the explanation of the scripture and obviously accepted it, he said that he belived with all his heart and at that point was saved, so he rightly he wanted to baptised, it’s just that simple. Ralph
 
PaulC As per post 968 you haven’t answered my question as to what do you mean by “discrete activity following the laying of hands” What kind of activity are you speaking about? Give me Scripture reference. Why does Heb 6:2 speaks of baptisms plural can you name more than water baptism for me? In Christ Ed
Ed, I answered you in 968 and Steve added to it in 969. what exactly are you looking for. In the Acts 9 discussion, Ananias and Paul go through a series of activies. Ananias lays hands on Paul. Scales fall from Paul’s eyes and he can see. Then he gets up and then he gets baptized. Why is this so hard to grasp. The laying of hands and the baptism are not the same events. Two things happen between them. Scales fall from Paul’s eyes and he gets up…

Here’s the scriptural reference Acts: 9: 17-20:
17 So Ananias went and entered the house; laying his hands on him, he said, “Saul, my brother, the Lord has sent me, Jesus who appeared to you on the way by which you came, that you may regain your sight and be filled with the holy Spirit.”
18
Immediately things like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight. He got up and was baptized,
19
and when he had eaten, he recovered his strength. 5 He stayed some days with the disciples in Damascus,
20
and he began at once to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.

As for your question on Hebrews 6: 2 Here is the whole sentence (including Hebrews 6:1:
Therefore, let us leave behind the basic teaching about Christ and advance to maturity, without laying the foundation all over again: repentance from dead works and faith in God, instruction about baptisms 1 and laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead and eternal judgment.

Here’s the footnote form the NAB:
1 [2] Instruction about baptisms: not simply about Christian baptism but about the difference between it and similar Jewish rites, such as proselyte baptism, John’s baptism, and the washings of the Qumran sectaries. Laying on of hands: in Acts 8:17; 19:6 this rite effects the infusion of the holy Spirit; in Acts 6:6; 13:3; 1 Tim 4:14; 5:22; 2 Tim 1:6 it is a means of conferring some ministry or mission in the early Christian community.
 
Ed, I answered you in 968 and Steve added to it in 969. what exactly are you looking for. In the Acts 9 discussion, Ananias and Paul go through a series of activies. Ananias lays hands on Paul. Scales fall from Paul’s eyes and he can see. Then he gets up and then he gets baptized. Why is this so hard to grasp. The laying of hands and the baptism are not the same events. Two things happen between them. Scales fall from Paul’s eyes and he gets up…

Here’s the scriptural reference Acts: 9: 17-20:
17 So Ananias went and entered the house; laying his hands on him, he said, “Saul, my brother, the Lord has sent me, Jesus who appeared to you on the way by which you came, that you may regain your sight and be filled with the holy Spirit.”
18
Immediately things like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight. He got up and was baptized,
19
and when he had eaten, he recovered his strength. 5 He stayed some days with the disciples in Damascus,
20
and he began at once to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.

As for your question on Hebrews 6: 2 Here is the whole sentence (including Hebrews 6:1:
Therefore, let us leave behind the basic teaching about Christ and advance to maturity, without laying the foundation all over again: repentance from dead works and faith in God, instruction about baptisms 1 and laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead and eternal judgment.

Here’s the footnote form the NAB:
1 [2] Instruction about baptisms: not simply about Christian baptism but about the difference between it and similar Jewish rites, such as proselyte baptism, John’s baptism, and the washings of the Qumran sectaries. Laying on of hands: in Acts 8:17; 19:6 this rite effects the infusion of the holy Spirit; in Acts 6:6; 13:3; 1 Tim 4:14; 5:22; 2 Tim 1:6 it is a means of conferring some ministry or mission in the early Christian community.
PaulC apparently you haven’t read my detailed description of Jesus, Paul and Ananias that I posted on 970. It differs from what you try to explain to me here. Also you said there’s only one batism which is ALWAYS of water. Now pay attention to this: Mat 3:11 John speaks, “I baptize you with water for repentance, But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire”. To me, I see it as one baptism with water and ANOTHER baptism in the Holy Spirit. What say you? Can you show me a Scripture where it’s states by water baptism one is FILLED with the Holy Spirit? ED
 
PaulC apparently you haven’t read my detailed description of Jesus, Paul and Ananias that I posted on 970. It differs from what you try to explain to me here. Also you said there’s only one batism which is ALWAYS of water. Now pay attention to this: Mat 3:11 John speaks, “I baptize you with water for repentance, But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire”. To me, I see it as one baptism with water and ANOTHER baptism in the Holy Spirit. What say you? Can you show me a Scripture where it’s states by water baptism one is FILLED with the Holy Spirit? ED
Of course I read 970. I was rebutting what you said. You claim that the laying on with hands and the baptism are one act but they clearly are not, separated by two other actions described above ( the scales falling from his eyes and him getting up.)

And yes, I can show you at least two instances where water baptism fills you with the holy spirit.

In Luke 3: 21-22: The holy spirit descends upon Jesus after water baptism:
After all the people had been baptized and Jesus also had been baptized and was praying, heaven was opened and the holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased.”

In Acts 2: 38 Peter tells the converts at Pentecost that if they are baptized, they will receive the holy spirit:
Peter (said) to them, "Repent and be baptized, 7 every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the holy Spirit

In Matthew 3:11, John is telling his listeners that the Baptism in the name of the Father, son and Holy spirit, brings the Holy Spirit, while his baptism did not.
 
Hi Steve it’s good to hear from you again. Let’s start from the begining: Jesus tells Ananias that Paul sees in a vision, KJV “And hath seen in a vision a man named Annias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight”. (note Jesus said nothing about water baptism or Holy Spirit) Then Ananias tells Jesus he’s afraid of paul etc. Jesus tells him not to be etc. Now v17 Ananias meets Paul, KJV “Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be FILLED with the Holy Spirit”. Jesus didn’t say anything about baptism or Holy Spirit but Ananias knows that since Paul was already praying to Jesus he believed, was born again, so when he lays hands on him he will not only regain his sight but will be FILLED with the Holy Spirit. per Acts 8:17 KJV of v18,'And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales; and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized". v19 “And when he had received meat, he was strengthened”. I take v18 to mean that when Ananias laid hands (prayed) for Paul he got it all, scales removed, sight restored and was (baptized) FILLED with the Holy Spirit. Then because he was so weak he sat down to eat. Since Paul stayed in Damascus a few days, he probably was told about water baptism and was baptized. That’s why in Acts 22 his account differs from Acts 9. He doesn’t mentioned hands being laid on him, how he was filled with the Holy Spirit. He mentioned water baptism to confess his sins (repentance) to wash his sins away calling on Jesus to do it. Water baptism does not FILL with the Holy Spirit. Love in Christ Ed.
Ed, you and I both believe that faith was required of Saul to be filled with the HS.

But Ed, if you believe the laying on of hands is the instrument by which the HS came into Saul, why is it so much of a stretch for you to believe that water baptism is that instrument? They’re both simply instruments of transference…and you seem to argue that the laying on of hands is what was used in this transference. We argue that it’s water baptism. But we both agree that Saul had to believe first. So what’s the problem? Are you saying that the laying on of hands healed Saul, but he would’ve been filled with the HS just by his conversion/belief?

They are distinct events, Ed. The laying on of hands in Saul’s case was for healing. If he received the HS at the laying on of hands, why did he “get up” to be baptized? It makes no sense. If it’s as you say, Scripture would leave out the “got up” part, and leave out the “was baptized” part, and just put something like “and he was filled with the HS” right after the “he regained his sight” part.

What it infers, rather, is that he got up, presumably to move to a source of water with Ananias, and was baptized - to receive the Spirit. But he did believe prior, that’s what we can agree on, yes? And it seems we can also agree on the fact that the filling of the HS did not happen based merely on his belief? Or do you disagree with that?
 
The eunuch has this scripture explained to him by Phillip, it was about the death of Jesus at Calvary. When the eunuch understood the explanation of the scripture and obviously accepted it, he said that he belived with all his heart and **at that point was saved, **so he rightly he wanted to baptised, it’s just that simple. Ralph
Where in the text does is say he was saved at that point…
If you believe that Christ is the Son of God why wouldn’t you want to be baptised
How did the enoch know about baptism

Jesus was preached to him
He then asked to be baptised right after
Phillip asked if he believed Christ is the Son of God
He said yes
So Phillip water baptised him

Christ said Mark 16:16 “He who believes AND is baptised shall be saved”

Unless you’re born of water and Spirit you “cannot enter into the kingdom of God” John 3:5

The eunuch believed AND was baptised
 
Where in the text does is say he was saved at that point…
If you believe that Christ is the Son of God why wouldn’t you want to be baptised
How did the enoch know about baptism

Jesus was preached to him
He then asked to be baptised right after
Phillip asked if he believed Christ is the Son of God
He said yes
So Phillip water baptised him

Christ said Mark 16:16 “He who believes AND is baptised shall be saved”

Unless you’re born of water and Spirit you “cannot enter into the kingdom of God” John 3:5

The eunuch believed AND was baptised
Many good answers to this important question. . 🙂
I’ll just add, If we accept Jesus into our lives and walk with him everyday,we are saved.
See also, 1Jn.5:12, Jn.14:6
I like Rom.10:9-13

God bless,
jean
 
Of course I read 970. I was rebutting what you said. You claim that the laying on with hands and the baptism are one act but they clearly are not, separated by two other actions described above ( the scales falling from his eyes and him getting up.)

And yes, I can show you at least two instances where water baptism fills you with the holy spirit.

In Luke 3: 21-22: The holy spirit descends upon Jesus after water baptism:
After all the people had been baptized and Jesus also had been baptized and was praying, heaven was opened and the holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, “You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased.”

In Acts 2: 38 Peter tells the converts at Pentecost that if they are baptized, they will receive the holy spirit:
Peter (said) to them, "Repent and be baptized, 7 every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the holy Spirit

In Matthew 3:11, John is telling his listeners that the Baptism in the name of the Father, son and Holy spirit, brings the Holy Spirit, while his baptism did not.
PaulC, I respectfully say that you got it wrong. FIRST yes the laying of hands and the baptism being FILLED in the Holy Spirit is a ONE act. Acts 8:17 These people needed the Holy Spirit, they were only water baptized Acts 8:12 When hands were laid on them they were baptized and received the Holy Spirit. SECONDLY Luke 3:21-22 says nothing about receiving the Holy Spirit when being water baptized. Here’s what John 1:32 states,"I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on Him. v33 I would not have known Him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, ‘The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is He who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ Jesus was being revealed to John. THIRDLY Your reference to Acts 2:38 doesn’t fly. The people in Acts 8:12 above were water baptized but did not receive the Holy Spirit. FOURTHLY in Mat 3;11 there is NOTHING mentioned about baptizing in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit Love in Christ Ed
 
PaulC, I respectfully say that you got it wrong. FIRST yes the laying of hands and the baptism being FILLED in the Holy Spirit is a ONE act. Acts 8:17 These people needed the Holy Spirit, they were only water baptized Acts 8:12 When hands were laid on them they were baptized and received the Holy Spirit. SECONDLY Luke 3:21-22 says nothing about receiving the Holy Spirit when being water baptized. Here’s what John 1:32 states,"I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on Him. v33 I would not have known Him, except that the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, ‘The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is He who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ Jesus was being revealed to John. THIRDLY Your reference to Acts 2:38 doesn’t fly. The people in Acts 8:12 above were water baptized but did not receive the Holy Spirit. FOURTHLY in Mat 3;11 there is NOTHING mentioned about baptizing in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit Love in Christ Ed
Ed,
Just saying something does not prove that it is right. There clearly are two distinct actions in Acts 9. The laying on of hands and then, after Saul was cured and GOT UP, he was baptized. Baptism has always been required for entry into the church.

Luke 3:21-22 says that when Jesus was baptized, the holy spirit descended on him in bodily form. What could be more clear than that. John 1:32 says the same thing. Jesus was baptized and then the spirit came down on him. This demonstrates the clear linkage between baptism and the reception of the Holy Spirit in a very visable way.

Why doesn’t Acts 2:38 demonstrate the linkage between Baptism and the reception of the Holy Spirit? It says it very clearly:
Peter (said) to them, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the holy Spirit

You are right that in Acts 8:12, an additional step was required AFTER water baptism to recieve the Holy Spirit. I’ll be honest and say that it is unclear to me why that was required in this specific case. Was it because the baptism formula used by Philip was insufficient? Was it because the Lord wanted Peter to be involved in this specific case? I simply don’t know. Perhaps others can answer that. But it is clear that they needed to be Baptized as well. Scripture is clear that they were baptized. Correct?

You are right also that in Matt 3:11, there is no mention of Baptizing in the name of the Father, son and Holy spirit. I was trying to point out the difference in the baptizing formula used by Christians and by John. Clearly John’s formula was insufficient to confer the holy spirit, as he readily admits.
 
Does God save people in the OT the same as the NT? Explain.
Not sure where you are going with this question. You obviously recognize that Christ died for our redemption.

We believe that you are saved by grace through faith, demonstrated by Baptism in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy spirit. Once baptized, you are cleansed of your previous sin and given the necesary grace to be saved.

Once saved, however, you need to continue to live in Christ. This means loving God and your neighbor and doing the God’s will. If you fail to do this and sin, you lose the grace given to you in Baptism. You can regain that grace and be reconciled to God, however, through the sacrament of reconciliation, which requires contrite confession of sins to a priest, repentance and penance. If you die in the state of Grace, you will go to heaven, although if you have not yet become perfectly holy, you will spend time in purgatory getting sanctified prior to entering heaven.

This of course was not available prior to Christ. Those that died prior to that are in the hands of God.
 
Not sure where you are going with this question. You obviously recognize that Christ died for our redemption.

We believe that you are saved by grace through faith, demonstrated by Baptism in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy spirit. Once baptized, you are cleansed of your previous sin and given the necesary grace to be saved.

Once saved, however, you need to continue to live in Christ. This means loving God and your neighbor and doing the God’s will. If you fail to do this and sin, you lose the grace given to you in Baptism. You can regain that grace and be reconciled to God, however, through the sacrament of reconciliation, which requires contrite confession of sins to a priest, repentance and penance. If you die in the state of Grace, you will go to heaven, although if you have not yet become perfectly holy, you will spend time in purgatory getting sanctified prior to entering heaven.

This of course was not available prior to Christ. Those that died prior to that are in the hands of God.
If God saves people differently in the OT than the NT, then we can conclude that God changed the way He saves; although I cannot support that from Scripture, nor do I subscribe to that position.

Based on your assumption above “This means loving God and your neighbor and doing the God’s will. If you fail to do this and sin, you lose the grace given to you in Baptism.” , then everyone has lost this grace, which means that saving grace is no longer saving grace and has no merit.
 
If God saves people differently in the OT than the NT, then we can conclude that God changed the way He saves; although I cannot support that from Scripture, nor do I subscribe to that position.
So you subscribe to a position that says that the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ had no effect on the way that God saves?
Based on your assumption above “This means loving God and your neighbor and doing the God’s will. If you fail to do this and sin, you lose the grace given to you in Baptism.” , then everyone has lost this grace, which means that saving grace is no longer saving grace and has no merit.
Saving grace absolutely has merit. Without it, no one would be saved. And yes, people sin, but God in his mercy has provided a way to regain grace lost through sin.- the sacrament of reconciliation I described above.

Live is a journey toward or away from God. If you are going toward God, you are doing things to make yourself more holy: receiving the sacraments, doing works of mercy, etc.
If you are going away from God, you do the opposite. If you do nothing, you will not achieve heaven. You need to actually love to get there. That is the whole message of Jesus Christ in a nutshell: Love God with all your heart, all your mind and all your soul. Love your neighbor as yourself. As Jesus said, that sums up the commandments and the prophets.
 
Ed, you and I both believe that faith was required of Saul to be filled with the HS.

But Ed, if you believe the laying on of hands is the instrument by which the HS came into Saul, why is it so much of a stretch for you to believe that water baptism is that instrument? They’re both simply instruments of transference…and you seem to argue that the laying on of hands is what was used in this transference. We argue that it’s water baptism. But we both agree that Saul had to believe first. So what’s the problem? Are you saying that the laying on of hands healed Saul, but he would’ve been filled with the HS just by his conversion/belief?

They are distinct events, Ed. The laying on of hands in Saul’s case was for healing. If he received the HS at the laying on of hands, why did he “get up” to be baptized? It makes no sense. If it’s as you say, Scripture would leave out the “got up” part, and leave out the “was baptized” part, and just put something like “and he was filled with the HS” right after the “he regained his sight” part.

What it infers, rather, is that he got up, presumably to move to a source of water with Ananias, and was baptized - to receive the Spirit. But he did believe prior, that’s what we can agree on, yes? And it seems we can also agree on the fact that the filling of the HS did not happen based merely on his belief? Or do you disagree with that?
Thanks Steve for your reply. Here’s where we differ. I believe that when a person believes on Jesus, that person then becomes “born again”. Then when baptized, it’s then an outward sign of an inward reality that came by grace throught faith. That’s why John says his baptism is of repentance. When that person confesses his/her sins, they are symbolically washed away. (not forgiven it takes Jesus’ blood to forgive them) Or as some say, water baptism is an entrance to the church of God, to a new life, died , burried with Jesus etc… Now as I understand it in Catholicism, a person becomes “born again” through water baptism and receives the Holy Spirit. But isn’t God showing us in Acts 8:12 that isn’t so.Those people believed in Jesus, were water baptized but yet no Holy Spirit, until Peter and John came down and laid hands, prayed for them to receive the Holy Spirit. That’s the Power that Jesus spoke about in Acts.1:8. Now getting back to Paul and Ananias, after Paul got up, because he was weak and hungry he sat down to eat. He was in a house, no water to be submerged in to be baptized. Now when you compare his account in Acts 22:16 “now what are you waiting for, Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away etc.” That statement fits better here, after spending a few days with desciples in Damascus who told him about water baptism. And not Ananias telling a hungry weak man to be baptized that he knows nothing about. When Paul is told that he will receive his sight and be FILLED with the Holy Sprit, I take that to mean he was healed and FILLED baptized in the Holy Spirit. The word FILLED appears for the first time after Pentacost Acts.4:8 I know that we are splitting hairs over which baptism, but it’s a very crucial point. It all stems from interpretation of Jh 3:5. I would very much like to discuss that with you, verse by verse . Thanks love yah in Christ Ed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top