This is a classic theological question, one that I have never had properly answered,
Also it could be argued this opens up a paradox.
God is all-powerful He is also completely and utterly kind.
Yet there is suffering.
So God is not all-powerful,
Conclusion there is no God
Or
God is not all kind
Conclusion God is evil
I am very interested to see your responses!
Your objections are sound and require a good answers. I would like to thank you for standing up against the objections raised by our fellow Catholics and for easily dismantling them. Atheism is on the rise because of the false ideology that God “permits evil to bring good out of it.” The view is extremely harmful and it makes human life look worthless. As if we are not made in the image of God. Also the free will argument does not hold up even remotely. There are plenty of instances where our free will would not violated by an act of God. Catholics support such a view because they have no other way of defending the why of suffering." But little did they realize they are defending an idea of God who is not perfectly good and who is not perfectly opposed to evil. The atheist are right in rejecting a “god” that ought to be rejected. I will quote New Apologetics to give you an answer.
. " If God exists, he is omniscient, omnipotent, infinitely good, and his perfect goodness entails a perfect opposition to every evil (including all suffering of the innocent). All evil is infinitely offensive to the infinite goodness of God, and while he unfailingly draws greater good out of every evil, his act of “permitting” evil is not to be understood as involving any degree of approval. Rather, God’s permission of evil is the endurance of that which is infinitely offensive to him."(
newapologetics.com/a-line-in-the-sand)
** If God is perfectly opposed to all evil, then why does God not intervene in the world more often to either prevent or at least reduce it?**
" Though omnipotent, God has irrevocably set a limit to his own power:
“God has not willed to reserve to himself all exercise of power. He entrusts to every creature the functions it is capable of performing, according to the capacities of its own nature.” (CCC, 1884)
In gratuitous generosity, God has arranged that real power in shaping the world be given to human beings and angels for the sake of imbuing created persons with authentic importance as co-creators. In offering himself totally to creatures, God has given himself away in a most radical manner: All powers and roles of importance that can logically possibly be entrusted to others have, in fact, been given to human beings and angels for the sake of imbuing authentic and irreplaceable importance to each creature made in the image of God:
“We can never give too great prominence to the Scholastic principle that God never does through Himself what may be achieved through created causality… For any result which does not require actually infinite power, God will sooner create a new spiritual being capable of producing that result than produce it Himself.” (Abbot Anscar Vonier, The Human Soul)
There are areas of responsibility that can only be acted upon by God (e.g. the creation of the universe out of nothing, or the governance of the entirety of reality via omniscient providence), and these cannot be given over to creatures due to the limits of logical possibility. Even so, the self-emptying of God is such that many of those actions which can only be accomplished by God himself (such as the forgiveness of sins, or the changing of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ) have been entrusted to human beings as intermediaries through the sacramental ministry of the priesthood. According to God’s generosity, if something can possibly be done or mediated by a finite power, God creates a finite creature to do it rather than doing the thing directly. Since this is a true giving, and not merely the appearance of gift, it follows that creatures now have a kind of power in the world that God does not have.
Even though sin and the suffering caused by it is an infinite offense to him, God is (though metaphysically omnipotent) functionally dependent on the actions of creatures
obedient to him in order to manifest his will and justice in the world. God is in no way controlling things directly, and if a created person chooses to do evil, then real damage is done." (New Apologetics)
I would like to add he would intervene in tragic circumstances but in order to do it would diminish his creatures because he has really given us the gifts. Of course this does not answer every circumstance but it is a start. This view upholds the dignity of human beings and of God. God is Infinitely Good!