S
SentinelofTruth
Guest
Neutrality is just the lack of anything inherently good or evil. While free will in itself has no moral value, it permits the departure from neutrality.I meant the outcome of action of a being with neutral nature has to be neutral. You can expect any good and evil from them.
God couldn’t have made us good from the start. It’s a contradiction in terms.I think it is quite irrational to create a neutral being. A quality of being that its outcome is neutral. It does completely lack any purpose in being and in creation.
The concepts of good and evil are automatically known to all beings with free will, because just by virtue of having free will they experience both temptation and natural law.Without concept of good and evil we can never exercise our free will. Evil is not outcome of our free will it is something intrinsic, as intrinsic as good, absence of one make another a neural quality and vise versa.
Also, was “neural” a typo? Did you mean “neutral”? Cause that would make a lot more sense.