How could the universe and life come into existence without God? How could life evolve without God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric_Hyom
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Science has hypothesised a number of possible causes for the Big Bang: the multiverse, colliding branes and others.
Mmmm hypothetical evidence, powerful stuff.
None of those hypothetical causes are intelligent, and all can potentially trigger the Big Bang.
We are supposed to take notice of hypothetical causes because…
So far there is no scientific evidence to show that intelligence is required in a cause for the Big Bang.
So far, there is no scientific evidence to show that the BB happened by natural causes.

Your answer falls in the category of “we don’t know”.
 
Your answer falls in the category of “we don’t know”.
Yes. One of the strengths of science is that it is prepared to accept “we don’t know” as an answer pro tem.

Are you prepared to accept a non-intelligent cause of the Big Bang pro tem? After all it could be that God created branes and colliding branes then triggered the Big Bang. Something like: “Let the branes bring forth…” perhaps. God can create indirectly as well as directly.
 
No but you do believe you will be healed from a disease caused by strep when you take amoxicillin. It is not a guarantee that you will be healed.

I just don’t understand your point.
No sir, not in sense that people believe prayer will heal them. I expect that the drug will likely resolve the infection based upon scientific data. However, I also know that if its resistant bacteria or is gram negative or positive and the infection is the other, the drug may be ineffective. For reasons demonstrable by scientific testing.

If a person prays for healing they are not just placing confidence in a model that’s reliably indicated to succeed. The very act of having faith is part of the process. It’s a main ingredient. And if they don’t have success, there’s no way to test the reasons why it failed. Because faith is not measurable.
 
No sir, not in sense that people believe prayer will heal them. I expect that the drug will likely resolve the infection based upon scientific data. However, I also know that if its resistant bacteria or is gram negative or positive and the infection is the other, the drug may be ineffective. For reasons demonstrable by scientific testing.

If a person prays for healing they are not just placing confidence in a model that’s reliably indicated to succeed. The very act of having faith is part of the process. It’s a main ingredient. And if they don’t have success, there’s no way to test the reasons why it failed. Because faith is not measurable.
And that’s faith. Faith comes with hope. It is the same thing when you hope to get well after taking a drug. Even the doc that administers the drug has a lot of faith on the tested drug.
 
Sorry, but if you think that putting your faith in God, and putting your faith in medicine
Of course God and medicine are not the same thing but faith is.
Complete trust or confidence on something or someone.
 
Last edited:
Of course God and medicine are not the same thing but faith is.
Complete trust or confidence on something or someone.
Tell that to those dead children…faith in God or faith in medicine…what’s the difference?

The difference is that one has actual evidence to underpin that faith, while the other has nothing but fanciful claims and unwarranted hope.
 
Tell that to those dead children…faith in God or faith in medicine…what’s the difference?

The difference is that one has actual evidence to underpin that faith, while the other has nothing but fanciful claims and unwarranted hope.
Faith in God is also about the ‘hereafter’ or life after death, so i don’t know what you are talking about.
Giving birth in hospital is not a guarantee that the child will live and giving birth at home is not a guarantee that the child will die.In each case, you hope.
 
Last edited:
Giving birth in hospital is not a guarantee that the child will live and giving birth at home is not a guarantee that the child will die.In each case, you hope.
Sure, but try prayer in lieu of insulin for a child with type 1 diabetes and see what that gets you.
 
Sure, but try prayer in lieu of insulin for a child with type 1 diabetes and see what that gets you.
I think there’s some confusion. If i put my trust in God, i do so hoping that the condition is entirely reversed knowing that whatever the outcome is, it will be the will of God and even in the afterlife.

If i put my trust in the doctors and insulin, i’m certain that the condition will be managed but not reversed but i can still hope to get well(having the condition reversed). The hope in both cases is the same. IOW, i’m hoping not to die from this condition.

I can put my trust in God that my child isn’t born with this condition but i can not put trust in insulin that my child isn’t born with this condition.
 
Last edited:
So far, there is no scientific evidence to show that the BB happened by natural causes.

Your answer falls in the category of “we don’t know”.
Yes. One of the strengths of science is that it is prepared to accept “we don’t know” as an answer pro tem .
Up until today, science has no convincing evidence to show that the universe happened by natural causes.

Adding pro tem on the end of your answer has no real meaning. If you are hoping that science will prove you right eventually, then you are entering into the realms of faith.
 
Up until today, science has no convincing evidence to show that the universe happened by natural causes.
Up until today, theology has no convincing evidence to show that the universe happened by supernatural causes.
Adding pro tem on the end of your answer has no real meaning. If you are hoping that science will prove you right eventually, then you are entering into the realms of faith.
It was a warning against trying for a God-of-the-gaps strategy. That is a good way to make God smaller as the gap shrinks.
“We are to find God in what we know, not in what we do not know; God wants us to realize his presence, not in unsolved problems but in those that are solved.”

– Dietrich Bonhoeffer, “Letters and Papers from Prison”
 
Most folk who doubt God , tend to also believe there is life on other planets or within the universe.

People who follow God know there is NO life on any other planet. Only the spiritual world.

For a extremely intelligent person, they will find that FACT impossible to understand.

So they , can keep looking as long as these intelligent people want. But it’s a waste of time ( no offence meant ).
 
Last edited:
40.png
Eric_Hyom:
Fair enough, i don’t want to cause you any problems.
How did the universe and life start by natural causes? And without any help from from a God who created everything except himself.
By agreeing that God did not create Himself, then you also agree that God did not create life, since He Himself is alive. If God is eternal and uncreated then life is also eternal and uncreated since God is a living God.

Whether or not God created the universe depends on the definition of “universe”. The OP says:
  • “For the purpose of this thread, can we define God as the creator of all that is seen and unseen.”
From that I assume that you are talking about more than the material STEM universe. If that is the case then we are talking about the philosophical “All That Exists” (ATE) universe. Since God exists, then He is a part of the ATE universe. Since God is eternal then the ATE universe is also eternal. Hence, by the Kalaam argument the ATE universe did not have a cause/creator. Also anything outside the ATE universe does not exist, by definition, hence there is no existing external cause for the ATE universe.

God may have created some parts of the ATE universe, but He did not create the entire ATE universe.
Rossum ,

The Living God. ‘ Through God , all our Souls will live forever and NO one dies ‘ not even Sinners.

Without being disrespectful , you seem to not understanding my friend.
 
Last edited:
Up until today, theology has no convincing evidence to show that the universe happened by supernatural causes.
Uhh but that’s the most natural position in the absence of empirical evidence and this applies to so many other realities; for example, up until today, we (you and me) just understand that darkness is real without any form of empirical evidence.
 
Last edited:
It was a warning against trying for a God-of-the-gaps strategy. That is a good way to make God smaller as the gap shrinks.
Philosophy put science, originally named the philosophy of nature, into its special little sandbox with the instructions, “Only appeal to natural causes for your observed effects. Thou shalt not appeal to the supernatural. We have others who do that special work.” The reason: we cannot depend on miracles in mastering nature to our benefit.
 
Last edited:
People who follow God know there is NO life on any other planet. Only the spiritual world.
People who follow the Buddha know there IS life on other planets – scripture says so. Are you prepared to convert if scientists find life elsewhere in the universe?
 
Without being disrespectful , you seem to not understanding my friend.
I am Buddhist, not Christian. My understanding is different because my scriptures are different:
“All the elements of reality are soulless.”
When one realises this by wisdom,
then one does not heed ill.
This is the Path of Purity.

– Dhammapada 20:7
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top