How could the universe and life come into existence without God? How could life evolve without God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric_Hyom
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My apologies, I wrongly assumed you was non religious.

Yes I would reconsider my faith. But I trust the Lord 100% so know life will never be found outside our planet.
 
I suggest reading the book The new physics needed to probe the origins of life

Complexity theory is the hottest topic today - all the math can be generated from just some rules of Lambda calculus, Wolfram in this Physics site recentely showed how incredibly different structures, physical universes could emerge from the combinatorics of few very simple rules. In mathe there is the Ramsey theory that says that in the vast space of combinatorial structures there emerges necessarily quite interesting structures. It is just the large numbers and combinatorics. It is the theory of complexity and emergence. Scientific community is starting to grasp this only during recent decades and even more time will be lost when such ideas will go down to the University students, to high schools and middle schools and to the general public.
 
My apologies, I wrongly assumed you was non religious.

Yes I would reconsider my faith. But I trust the Lord 100% so know life will never be found outside our planet.
Where do you believe that God has specified that, for example, some form of life won’t be found on say Europa.

“ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS EXCEPT EUROPA.
ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE.”
 
No, that slight of hand does not change the fact that faith is hoping for something you have not seen before. The evidence of things unseen.

A doctor prescribes an antibiotic having already seen its actions on many patients and these actions of the drug are directly observable under microscope. The effects of Lazarus being raised from the dead are not observable or measurable by scientific method.

I’m an atheist but even I can see that by trying to apply the same definition of faith to scientific method, you are profaning and debasing faith by reducing it to the same realm as the mundane and earthly.
 
Last edited:
So, what does the Bible say?
The earth and mankind are unique in God’s creation. [Genesis 1] teaches that God created the earth before He even created the sun, the moon, or the stars.

[Acts 17:24-26] states that “the God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands…he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live.”
 
Anyone who trusts Gods words (which is the Bible) would know Earth was created first. To believe life is on other planets is in conflict with Gods word.
 
Last edited:
A doctor prescribes an antibiotic having already seen its actions on many patients and these actions of the drug are directly observable under microscope.
So why do people still die in hospitals?
The effects of Lazarus being raised from the dead are not observable or measurable by scientific method.
Many realities are not observable or measurable by scientific method. Example, silence
 
Why do people die in hospitals? For many reasons. This question is vague.

Silence is the absence of sound waves.
There’s nothing supernatural about that.
 
Why do people die in hospitals? For many reasons. This question is vague.
Ok, so people still succumb even when tested drugs with observable positive effects are administered. This explains why both the doctor and the patient have faith in the tested drug.
Silence is the absence of sound waves.
There’s nothing supernatural about that.
So is the absence of sound waves real?
 
Anyone who trusts Gods words (which is the Bible) would know Earth was created first. To believe life is on other planets is in conflict with Gods word.
Where are these words of God that says such a thing is not possible?
 
No, that slight of hand does not change the fact that faith is hoping for something you have not seen before. The evidence of things unseen.
Do you have evidence of how the Big Bang happened by natural causes?
Do have evidence of how abiogenesis happened through natural causes?
 
Do you have evidence of how the Big Bang happened by natural causes?
Do have evidence of how abiogenesis happened through natural causes?
No to the first. Yes to the second, though the evidence is indicative, not complete.
 
Ok, so people still succumb even when tested drugs with observable positive effects are administered. This explains why both the doctor and the patient have faith in the tested drug.
And as I already addressed this point, the difference is the reasons for why it fails are observable by scientific method. We have naturalistic causes for why drugs and treatments are never 100% effective. It can be observed that a particular infection is resistant to a given antibiotic, for example.

Can you observe under a microscope a prayer for healing that didn’t get answered? No. And since the faith that undergirded that prayer is not measurable, but yet it is a requirement for a successful response, that remains a fundamental difference to a science based approach to recovery from disease.

If it’s observable, measurable, reviewable, testable then it’s something we can gain information about without regard to prayer, faith, etc. That doesn’t mean you can’t add those things to your bucket of tools for coping if you’re religious. But this whole “science is faith” argument is both disingenuous and a misrepresentation of both concepts.

When it comes to seeking medical treatment that’s been scientifically reviewed, faith has nothing to do with it. Again, science deals in probabilities and confidence levels. It makes predictions, not promises.
 
Last edited:
drugs and treatments are never 100% effective.
Can you observe under a microscope a prayer for healing that didn’t get answered? No. And since the faith that undergirded that prayer is not measurable, but yet it is a requirement for a successful response, that remains a fundamental difference to a science based approach to recovery from disease.
Doesn’t matter. The hope someone has when they take a tested drug that they will get cured is the same hope someone has when they pray. The effects might be observable in one case and not the other but the hope is same.
If it’s observable, measurable, reviewable, testable
But is silence an objective reality or is it imagined?
 
Last edited:
Doesn’t matter. The hope someone has when they take a tested drug that they will get cured is the same hope someone has when they pray. The effects might be observable in one case and not the other but the hope is same.
Yes it matters. You are confusing motivation with methodology. Faith and science-based medicine are different responses/ methodologies to the drive to live.

I already explained that silence is the absence of sound waves. An absence of sound waves, such as in airless environments like space, is observable and measurable (zero waves). However you experience the phenomenon, that’s all it is.
 
Yes it matters. You are confusing motivation with methodology. Faith and science-based medicine are different responses/ methodologies to the drive to live.
Nope.
I already explained that silence is the absence of sound waves.
No, you redefined silence but i would still ask, is the absence of sound a reality or is it imagined?
An absence of sound waves, such as in airless environments like space, is observable and measurable (zero waves). However you experience the phenomenon, that’s all it is.
So silence is measurable?!
Will i be correct to say that before the big bang it was silent and dark?
 
Last edited:
No, you redefined silence but i would still ask, is the absence of sound a reality or is it imagined?
No, I used the only definition of silence I’m familiar with. You may argue philosophical definitions to your heart’s content. But it doesn’t mean anything to me when it’s simply the absence of sound waves.

Regarding “before” the Big Bang, that is a nonsensical question to me because the Big Bang is where time starts. So asking what happened “before” time is a null question to me.

Also, if you’re going to start peppering with questions about the Big Bang, its causes, etc., I am not a physicist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top