How did The fall of Adam and Eve Happen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chistian-ity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly my point. The problem isn’t to show that there would be no evil acts if God prevented the evil acts - that’s not controversial. The problem is that many atheists argue that God can prevent the evil while simultaneously leaving free will intact. It would seem that that isn’t possible. If you give people free will (the ability to choose good or evil acts) then you inherently have to let them make that choice. But it’s impossible to make that choice if you know that the evil will be prevented. Therefore, God would have to allow the evil results of our choices if we are to have free will.

Although it seems that you are really arguing that, given that scenario, it would be better for God to deny us free will - that it was a mistake for him to give it to us. That a peaceful world made possible through Gods force of will is superior to a world of free agents that has evil in it. Perhaps, but I’m not sure if we can make a reasonable measurement of which of those two worlds is ‘better’.
 
Last edited:
Does the creation of original sin in the world by means of the Fall have no benefits for Adam and Eve and their descendants according to Christianity? True, it led to the potential for sin as well as death, enormous drawbacks; but at the same time, it led to the necessity for humans to adapt to life, to work for their survival and reap the benefits of their toil. Sure it led to struggle throughout people’s lives but also to the appearance of the light at the end of the tunnel, the better appreciation of the joy of meeting challenges and overcoming obstacles in this world, including the tears of the struggle. And it also led to the faith and hope of an eventual return to a state of inner peace and joy in the next world, surpassing even the pleasures found in the primordial Garden of Eden, in which Adam and Eve lived in innocence before the Fall and had all their needs tended to without knowing what it meant to be human and experience the sorrows and joys of life.
 
Last edited:
Good observation. I think St. Augustine called Adam’s sin a happy fault because God brings out of it a greater good than would have happened without it.
 
If by this you mean “inerrant”, the Church does not teach that every little thing in the scriptures is inerrant, especially since there’s rather clearly a human element involved. Neither is the Bible objective in its coverage.
 
I think you will find the Church teaches they were our first parents, not the first humans.
 
HUMANI GENERIS

37. When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains either that after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which through generation is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.
 
The Church has a responsibility to teach what it believes is correct, but then we have the right if discernment. An excellent book on this is “May Your (Informed) Conscience Be Your Guide”. Church teachings are not static en toto as we’ve seen historically, so there is some wiggle room-- just ask Galileo. 😉
 
From the Catechism, plus more on the Church and the ToE:
283. The question about the origins of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life-forms and the appearance of man. These discoveries invite us to even greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator, prompting us to give him thanks for all his works and for the understanding and wisdom he gives to scholars and researchers…

284. The great interest accorded to these studies is strongly stimulated by a question of another order, which goes beyond the proper domain of the natural sciences. It is not only a question of knowing when and how the universe arose physically, or when man appeared, but rather of discovering the meaning of such an origin… – Evolution and the Catholic Church - Wikipedia
 
Pope Benedict’s words on creation (while Cardinal Ratzinger):

“What response shall we make to this view [evolution]? It is the affair of the natural sciences to explain how the tree of life in particular continues to grow, and how new branches shoot out from it. This is not a matter for faith. … More reflective spirits have long been aware that there is no either-or here. We cannot say: ‘creation or evolution’, inasmuch as these two things respond to two different realities. The story of the dust of the earth and the breath of God, which we just heard, does not in fact explain how human persons come to be but rather what they are. It explains their inmost origin and casts light on the project that they are. And, vice versa, the theory of evolution seeks to understand and describe biological developments. But in so doing it cannot explain where the ‘project’ of human persons comes from, nor their inner origin, nor their particular nature. To that extent we are faced here with two complementary - rather than mutually exclusive - realities.”
 
CCC 375 The Church, interpreting the symbolism of biblical language in an authentic way, in the light of the New Testament and Tradition, teaches that our first parents, Adam and Eve, were constituted in an original “state of holiness and justice”.250 This grace of original holiness was “to share in. . .divine life”

Also extract from Catholic Answers article:

" Concerning biological evolution, the Church does not have an official position on whether various life forms developed over the course of time. However, it says that, if they did develop, then they did so under the impetus and guidance of God, and their ultimate creation must be ascribed to him.

Concerning human evolution, the Church has a more definite teaching. It allows for the possibility that man’s body developed from previous biological forms, under God’s guidance, but it insists on the special creation of his soul . Pope Pius XII declared that “the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions . . . take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God” (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36). So whether the human body was specially created or developed, we are required to hold as a matter of Catholic faith that the human soul is specially created; it did not evolve, and it is not inherited from our parents, as our bodies are.

While the Church permits belief in either special creation or developmental creation on certain questions, it in no circumstances permits belief in atheistic evolution.
 
Last edited:
Chistian-ity

6d
  1. God is omnipresent and omniscient
  2. God is infallible
  3. Meaning God is morally infallible
  4. God was all present and all knowing during the temptation of Adam of Eve
  5. God is all powerful and therefore could have stopped it.
  6. God did not stop it
Does this mean that God allowed the fall? Please explain.
1, 2, 3 all true
4 HE is still present and knowing now and to the end of time.
5 true
6 true
He allowed it because we are free to make mistakes and yes to sin too.
If HE had stopped it from happening then HE would have restricted our free will.
 
God did indeed allow the fall.

Free will with a capacity to sin will eventually do so as a statistical inevitability.

As the savior with His salvific role was present In The Beginning, this was planned for.

What will puzzle your brain more is how mankind is culpable for a sin he was destined to commit. But alas, that’s another thread.
 
I believe they are our first parents. I also believe in evolution which the Church permits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top