How do Catholics explain 1 Timothy 2:5 and Hebrews 7:26?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SIA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“Vivat” is active form, present tense, subjunctive voice. It means “let it live,” “if it should live,” and so forth. “Vivat” is usually translated “Long live” – as in “Vivat Elizabetha Regina!” “Long live Queen Elizabeth!”

Vivat Jesus!
Thanks! (But I like my Personal interpretation of always present tense Instructive, or Order, in Knighthood): Live in Jesus (Always)
👍 Tony
 
  • Thanks! (But I like my Personal interpretation of always present tense Instructive, or Order, in Knighthood): Live in Jesus (Always)
    👍 Tony
I apologize for invading your personal magisterium with the facts.
 
**
sseason,
“They”😃 love bible quotes, don’t forget Mary crowned as queen in heaven in Revelations 12, verses 1-5: " A great and wondrous sign appeared in heaven…" 👍 **
question for you Rob. Who is “they”?

Personally i love the entire Bible and when someone gives a passage like Revelation 12:1-5, i ask myself what came before and after that passage. So can you explain verses 6, 13-17 to me?
 
I apologize for invading your personal magisterium with the facts.
Not a Magesterium (always capitalized) but personal interpretation for highly effective ecumenicism and communication… My Knights of Columbus Brother thought, as many do, that Vivat Jesus means ‘Jesus Lives’. What a denaturing misnomer. 🙂
Vivat Jesus Tony
 
  • Not a Magesterium (always capitalized) but personal interpretation for highly effective ecumenicism and communication… My Knights of Columbus Brother thought, as many do, that Vivat Jesus means ‘Jesus Lives’. What a denaturing misnomer. 🙂
    Vivat Jesus Tony
The fact remains that it does not mean “Live in Jesus” – and ecumenism does not require the manipulation of meanings.
 
The fact remains that it does not mean “Live in Jesus” – and ecumenism does not require the manipulation of meanings.
Christianity, much less Catholicism, means do NOT Attack, criticize another!. Again, a Majority of Knights of Columbus think Vivat Jesus means ‘Jesus Lives’, the Opposite. I spend All my time helping Others!. Vatican Seminary Professor 32 years Fr Henschley expanded my GENERIC use of Present Tense Live in Jesus by adding 2 more examples of Current Tense Latin.

I suggest you Apologize, or face Formal Complaint.
Vivat Jesus, not your precise knowledge of Latin, or do-gooders trying to help others. Tony
 
What I understand private interpretation to be as Apostle Peter described it is: men creating their own doctrine not inspired by the Holy Spirit, and with no foundation in the Holy Scriptures.

When Jesus came in the flesh the Jews had invented a bunch of traditions that had no foundation whatsoever in the Holy Scriptures making the Law and the Testimony void through their traditions.
Jesus overcame them and Satan himself by responding with “Thus saith the Word of God” or “it is written” and He quoted from Scripture, not to make himself look smart, but because through the Word of God alone can we find safety. Jesus is our example.

So after Jesus ascended and the apostles died, many doctrines with no foundation on the scriptures started to lurk into the Church of God and that union of church and state that seemed like a good idea, just became a curse. Things like:
  1. Images of saints, penance and indulgences
  2. Holy Water (which is ridiculous)
  3. Praying to saints is never told to do in the Scriptures and didn’t start till around 240 a.d. (Waaay after the apostles died, and not a tradition they practiced themselves, or taught others to do)
  4. Infant baptism around 250 a.d. Which makes no sense, since like John says baptism reqs repentance, which a baby can’t counciously do.
  5. Eucharist around 1215 a.d. (way later) being the real flesh and blood of Christ and not just a symbol that Christ gave us to remember Him.
  6. Confesionals around 390 a.d.
  7. Purgatory " 593 a.d.
  8. The Roman Catholic Church real title didn’t exist till way later sometime between 500-606 a.d.
  9. Celibacy came around 300s its unscriptual and which Paul predicted would happen in 1 Timothy 4:1-3 in clear words. Which was introduced by the very church that claims to be the Church of Christ.
The list goes on and of course the RCC has an unscriptual tradition based explanation for each one of these points. If people chose to believe the Pope or those who invented them are under the protection of the Holy Spirit from being lies, the do so. But don’t expect a Christian who reads and seeks God in the Bible to accept something the Bible doesnt say.

RCCs who teach doctrines with no biblical foundation are no different than anyone who makes a sect. The Word of God (the Law and the Testimony) is the test by which all doctrines are tested. If they speak not according to that, there is no light in them - Isaiah 8:20

Again if we want to go by age, then we all need to go back to the real mother church, Judaism, which was also founded by Christ.
The same claims the RCCmakes is what the Jews said to Christians, but God’s Word shows that even something He starts can become corrupt. The Catholic church is not exempt, as long as sin exists, its only human. :\

“Thy Word is a Lamp unto my feet, a Light unto my path”

Amen
Arglaze, your list is ridiculous. Did you just copy the text from the first google hit you got? Nothing in that list is accurate, and you don’t do yourself any favors by thinking it is.
 
Yeah, it is wrong to look down on people, but everyone has a responsibility to share the Word of Jesus as he understands it and I encourage catholics and all to do so, even if they r wrong. Truth will always triumph over error, and it can only become more evident when everyone is given a chance to speak.

My only care is that God and His Word be magnified above everything, I really don’t care for people joining my church, as long as they follow the Word of God, the Rule of Faith.
Arglaze, (1) how do you explain your church’s bigining only 1863?
(2) Who are you to invent Massive number of falsehoods and false dates re THE 2,000 year old Church Our Lord founded?
(3) Aren’t you violating several essentials of Your Faith’s standards,# 12 like The Church is a Family of Believers, of different cultures, etc?

(4) Are only 15 Million of your church wordwide. Are 68 Million Catholics in the USA alone.

I ask these sincerely. Am Catholic, the Lord’s way.
Live in Jesus
Tony
 
Jesus is our Father also. But Mary is definetly not the Queen mother, that’s not what Jesus or his disciples teach us.

If they do, please provide scripture for it.

Ariel >>
Is it your contention that nothing is truth that is not found in scripture? How did the Church know what to believe before the New Testament was compiled, hundreds of years after our Lord’s resurrection? And with so few copies available outside of monasteries and even fewer who could read them, how did the faith survive?
 
I don’t believe anything that you have attributed to me as the following link will show. I said the exact opposite of what you said.
Post
**
My sincere apology adrift :signofcross: The remark was posted by “Arglaze” and you responded to that! I was in a rush to get out the doo and misread. I stand corrected!👍 **
 
Just wanted to know how you can believe in the Marian dogmas of Catholicism without it interferring dramatically with the Scriptures?

As for 1 Timothy 2.5, ISTM that the mediation of creatures is a created & finite aspect of the infinite Divine-human activity of Christ the Only Mediator. Their mediation no more “unseats” His, than our hands fight against or deny or contest our status as the causes of our posts.​

There is no other mediator, but only Christ. A Christ Who Mediates, & has members. So He works through them. None of their activity is outside of, or independent of His - what they do, they are capable of doing only because He unceasingly maintains then by His Spirit. An independent Christian is as much a fiction as a man with ten heads - a Christian is of all creatures least able to work by his native strength. BTW: “Christ works through His members” =///= “Christ does not work except through His members”

The problem seems AFAICS to owe something to thinking of Christ as “over here”, & His members as “over there”: IOW, as separate :eek: They are taken up into Him, alive in Him, made effective from Him & because of & for Him, through the indwelling Spirit Who is His & His Father’s. To judge from the NT, the relations between the Divine Persons & the members of Christ are “multi-dimensional”: all Divine Persons are in One Another & all His members are in all the Divine Persons, Who are in them. Not only that, but this complex of relations is living & dynamic.

[Hbr 7:26 (http://www.blueletterbible.org/cgi-bin/tools/printer-friendly.pl?book=Hbr&chapter=7&version=RSV#) For it was fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, blameless, unstained, separated from sinners, exalted above the heavens.

Is there a problem ?

See also:
  • Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation;
  • Col 1:16 for** in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, **whether thrones or dominions or principalities or authorities–all things were created through him and for him.
  • Col 1:17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
  • Col 1:18 He is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning, the first-born from the dead, that in everything he might be pre-eminent.
  • Col 1:19 ** For in him all the fulness of God was pleased to dwell, **
  • Col 1:20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.
    If the prepositions are treated literalistically, that passage makes no sense. But in fact, Christ is the cosmic “bond” of all creation - everything is related to Him, is subject to Him, is contained in Him. So he is above the heavens, even though they are in Him, & even though Christians are in Him. If - as - His Primacy is of this non-spatial & transcendent kind, why can His members not be active in Him without exhausting or challenging His Unique Mediatorial activity ? How is He obscured by them ? That’s a bit like saying that an atom in a plant obscures the sun: it is the sun that is a lowly instrument for keeping the atomic structure of plants healthy. Christ is far greater in efficacy & splendour & majesty than any mere star.
 
Originally Posted by Sailka
Thanks! (But I like my Personal interpretation of always present tense Instructive, or Order, in Knighthood): Live in Jesus (Always)
Tony

I apologize for invading your personal magisterium with the facts.
**
Mercy! I guess he told you! 😃 Tony sounds like one of “them”! :eek: He has his mind made up and nothing anyone says matters! 👍 Thank goodness he is a good guy! :highprayer: **
 
Originally Posted by Sailka
Thanks! (But I like my Personal interpretation of always present tense Instructive, or Order, in Knighthood): Live in Jesus (Always)
Tony


**
Mercy! I guess he told you! 😃 Tony sounds like one of “them”! :eek: He has his mind made up and nothing anyone says matters! 👍 Thank goodness he is a good guy! :highprayer: **
Hope am one of “Us” 🙂 I think all of us need to work Together. No excuse not to.
👋 :yawn: Vivat Jesus. Tony
 
question for you Rob. Who is “they”?
**If you ask I am guessing you are one of them!**Personally i love the entire Bible and when someone gives a passage like Revelation 12:1-5, i ask myself what came before and after that passage. So can you explain verses 6, 13-17 to me? Since we wrote it I kind of like the bible myself. a nice set of books. Poems, history, mystery, music, etc. Inspired not infalliable. I have been told there are over 50 versions out beside the real ones approved by the RCC i ask myself what came before and after that passage. **So why don’t you read what did ? Then you can twist it to mean whatever you want. I, myself actually don’t care. :coffeeread: **

So can you explain verses 6, 13-17 to me? **If I do, will you promise to accept what I tell you? 😃 If not I rather not waste both our time. **

OK I will give you the short answer. I don’t have any idea! 🤷 It is about a war past or future. In order to search out the intention of the sacred writers, attention must always be given, among other things, to “literary forms.” For truth is set forth and expressed differently in texts which are variously historical, poetic, or in this case prophetic.
The interpreter must investigate not only the words used but what meaning the sacred writer intended to express and had actually expressed in particular circumstances by using other contemporary literary forms in accordance with the situation of his own time and culture. 👍

Simple isn’t it?:hypno: So for the correct understanding of what the sacred author wanted to assert, due attention must be paid to the customary and characteristic styles of feeling, speaking and narrating which prevailed at the time of the sacred writer, and to the speach patterns men normally employed at that period in their everyday dealings with one another.

So, since the Bible must be read and interpreted in the sacred spirit in which it was written, no less serious attention must be given to the content and its unity of the whole of the Scripture, if the meaning of the sacred texts is to be correctly interpeted.👍 As you said you like to know what came before and after it! Also the “living tradition” of the whole Church must be taken into account along with the harmony which exists between different elements of the faith. It is the task of exegetes to work according to these rules toward a better understanding and explanation of the meaning of the scripture, so that through preparatory study the judgment of the Church may mature. For all of what has been said about the way of interpreting scripture it is always subject finally to the judgment of the RCC, which carries out the divine commission and ministry of guarding and interpreting the word of God. :highprayer: So I could ask the Catholic Church for an answer for you! 😃
 
1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

mediator= greek mesites
a go-between, an intermediary, a reconciler.

Catechism of the Catholic Church
969
“This motherhood of Mary in the order of grace continues uninterruptedly from the consent which she loyally gave at the Annunciation and which she sustained without wavering beneath the cross, until the eternal fulfillment of all the elect. Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation. . .
. Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix.”

Mediatrix (from Fr. John Hardon’s Modern Catholic Dictionary}

A title of the Blessed Virgin as mediator of grace. There are two aspects of this mediation. It is certain in Catholic theology that, since Mary gave birth to the Redeemer, who is source of all grace, she is in this way the channel of all graces to mankind. But it is only probable, as a legitimate opinion, that since Mary’s Assumption into heaven no grace is received by humans without her actual intercessory co-operation.
…This does not imply that the faithful must pray for all graces through Mary, nor that her intercession is inherently necessary for the distribution of divine blessing, but that, according to God’s special ordinance, the graces merited by Christ are conferred through the actual intercessory mediation of his mother. Recent popes and the Second Vatican Council have spoken in favor of this type of mediation, which finds support in patristic tradition…

Catechism of the Catholic Church
2679 Mary is the perfect Orans (pray-er), a figure of the Church. When we pray to her, we are adhering with her to the plan of the Father, who sends his Son to save all men. Like the beloved disciple we welcome Jesus’ mother into our homes,39 for she has become the mother of all the living. We can pray with and to her. The prayer of the Church is sustained by the prayer of Mary and united with it in hope.40

I have spent a lot of time and research today reading the Catechism. I did not do it because i wanted to say “got you” but because i respect all of you here and i do believe we are all brothers in Christ. Sailka posted the link to the Catechism earlier and i decided to start reading.
The texts that I have copied from the Catechism shows a clear contradiction with the Bible. For the Catholic Church Mary is a mediator between God and man. It also shows that every catholic is encouraged to pray to Mary (thing that is denied in this forum over and over again). I know that someone will say that when the Catechism says pray it does not really mean pray, but the truth is that not only it says it clearly but it also says that the prayers of every catholic are sustained by her prayer.
This forum is a blessing for me. Today i understood more than ever what Hebrews 4:12-13 means

12For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
13Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.
 
1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
** The RCC tells us what teachings are Correct. That is why we are “Catholic” we follow OUR CHURCH"s TEACHING! 👍 The idea that Jesus alone can mediate grace actually contradicts** scripture: Ephesians 4:29 tells us that you and I are to “impart grace” to others by our words. As members of the body of Christ, we are called to “impart” (or mediate) grace in a variety of ways, including ministries of healing, teaching, and prayer.

The key to a correct understanding of 1 Timothy 2:5 is to see that the one mediator stands “between God and men.” Only Jesus Christ can stand for us before God and gain our salvation and all grace. But what he has gained can be distributed from man to man among the members of his body. What he gives to me, I can, by his power, share with you, and vice versa. In fact, we experience this on a daily basis. Mary is a creature just like we are. She is not God!

Jesus is the “source” of grace. As branches abiding in the Vine, we can distribute his grace. Because of his mediation before God on our behalf—because he has gained grace for us and entrusts us with that grace—we are able to impart grace to others. His mother is “Full of Grace”

In calling Mary the Mediatrix of all graces, the Church does not mean that she is a rival for Jesus’ unique place. Vatican II clarified the Church’s position on 1 Timothy 2:5–6:
The maternal duty of Mary toward men in no way obscures Jesus’ place as our savior.
Catechism of the Catholic Church
969
“This motherhood of Mary… by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation. . .
. Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix.”

Mediatrix (from Fr. John Hardon’s Modern Catholic Dictionary}

A title of the Blessed Virgin as mediator of grace. There are two aspects of this mediation. It is certain in Catholic theology that, since Mary gave birth to the Redeemer, who is source of all grace, she is in this way the channel of all graces to mankind. But it is only probable, as a legitimate opinion, that since Mary’s Assumption into heaven no grace is received by humans without her actual intercessory co-operation.

I pray to Mary daily! I do not worship her. I ask her to have Jesus grant my prayers.

…This does not imply that the faithful must pray for all graces through Mary, nor that her intercession is inherently necessary for the distribution of divine blessing, but that, according to God’s special ordinance, the graces merited by Christ are conferred through the actual intercessory mediation of his mother. Recent popes and the Second Vatican Council have spoken in favor of this type of mediation, which finds support in patristic tradition…

Catechism of the Catholic Church
2679 Mary is the perfect Orans (pray-er), a figure of the Church. When we pray to her, we are adhering with her to the plan of the Father, who sends his Son to save all men. Like the beloved disciple we welcome Jesus’ mother into our homes,39 for she has become the mother of all the living. We can pray with and to her. The prayer of the Church is sustained by the prayer of Mary and united with it in hope.40

I have spent a lot of time and research today reading the Catechism.** I did not do it because i wanted to say “got you” but because i respect all of you here and i do believe we are all brothers in Christ. **Sailka posted the link to the Catechism earlier and i decided to start reading. **Sure you do! Could you respect us enough to allow us to practice “Our” religion unmolested by nonbelievers? We will allow you to do the same! :rolleyes: **

The texts that I have copied from the Catechism shows a clear contradiction with the Bible.
** :sleep: Could it be because the bible isn’t infalliable like the Body of Christ with Jesus as Our head is??? ** For the Catholic Church Mary is a mediator between God and man.**So arer saints! We use all the help we can get! ** It also shows that every catholic is encouraged to pray to Mary (thing that is denied in this forum over and over again).A catholic that says they don’t pray to Mary? "Hail Mary full of grace… "One of our main prayers. I pray it over 20 times a day! No Catholic even said they don’t pray to Mary! The may have said they don’t Worship her! We don’t! I know that someone will say that when the Catechism says pray it does not really mean pray, but the truth is that not only it says it clearly but it also says that the prayers of every catholic are sustained by her prayer.**I thank her son for that! Praise Jesus! **
This forum is a blessing for me. Today i understood more than ever what Hebrews 4:12-13 means
**If you believe what you like in the gospels, and reject what you don’t like, it is not the gospel you believe, but yourself.” Saint Augustine “And the church is his body; it is made full and complete by Christ, who fills all things everywhere with himself.” --Ephesians 1:23, NLT **
12For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
13Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.
**We were called to be witnesses, not lawyers or judges. :highprayer:
**
 
40.png
RobGentner:
Rob, after that post this is what i have learned: i know you can “copy and paste” . I also know that you believe that the Word of God is not infallible (i bet you think the Pope is), and that you have no clue what it means. Oh, almost forgot, you hate people that do not share what you believe.

PS: If you believe in a god (notice no capital G Rob) whose word is fallible tell him i want no part with him ok?
 
Rob, after that post this is what i have learned: i know you can “copy and paste” . I also know that you believe that the Word of God is not infallible (i bet you think the Pope is), and that you have no clue what it means. Oh, almost forgot, you hate people that do not share what you believe.

PS: If you believe in a god (notice no capital G Rob) whose word is fallible tell him i want no part with him ok?
The Word of God Is infallible. Problem is there are so many translations from the original texts of 2000 years ago. And so many ‘readings’ (interpretatations)
Code:
                                                                                          Good ones, Rob and SFC.  We don't hate.  2 Great posts.
Tony
 
40.png
RobGentner:
Rob i read your previous post and i do not intent to commit the same mistake again, i mean, i am young but i do not have that much time to waste.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top