brother Rob is just Humrous, PeterJ. Put some clothes on
npatrol: (Your Ratbert quote on your postings) and get your ‘feel goods’ legally: Laughing! :dancing: :extrahappy:Originally Posted by RobHom
New friend PeterJ Tried humor first time he contacted us: He did Double Wink! Does that not constitute trying to be funny?
**Pete ~ If you are not careful You are going to force me take back my remark about finally meeting someone that isn’t judgmental!:tsktsk:
I always attempt to show Christian Kindness and love always!
This post will be directly about the City of God By Ven. Mary of Jesus, I would like to apologize that I will be going of subject here.
Yes I have read that before. The Jews and many heretics didn't like what Christ said or taught either. To be honest most people will refuse to believe in private revelation, they seem to act as if cannon, dogma, or Scriptures are the only things that can been inspired by God. Venerable Maria de Agreda also converted many Native Americans in Arizona, and New Mexico without ever leaving the Convent in Agreda, this is known as Bilocation. I would also believe every word that she wrote because it is in complete harmony with all other Saints writings, with the Church Authority (cannon, dogmas), and the Holy Scriptures, and it is inspirational (when I read it I do feel Divine Influence, the same as when I read my Douay Rheims or Latin Vulgate). She has passed away over 341 years ago and still looks as if she is merely taking a nap, her body was examined in the early 1900s (around 1912), and in 1989 again with no changes; Scientist are and have been unable to explain this and to this day are baffled. There are many saint who are incorrupted, such as Saint Xavier, and Saint Teresa of Avila. When they pulled up John XXIII body, he was faced down and his body was dried out, and they couldn't even open Pius VI casket for the smell was unbearable. I will have to say though, with her body being incorrupt, I know that the Revaluations that the Holy Trinity granted her is legit. If you read her writing so many things make so much more sense. Everything that Saint Monfort (and all other saints) wrote on Our Blessed Mother is there plus more. If the Church were to give Her public approval of these private revelations (or any other revelations for that matter), they would have to be added as the deposit of Faith left by Christ, thus She has given a private approval. The Apostles Creed was and is a Verbal Tradition, thus you do not find it in Holy Scriptures. Something that Ven. Maria wrote about her interior feelings and fears:
*"Such assurance I have been solicitous to procure for the direction of my soul, and more particularly in this undertaking of writing the life of the Queen of heaven. I have frequently tried to prevent my superiors from being moved by any accounts of my interior experiences, disguising, as much as I could, many things, and in tears begging the Lord to enlighten them and to fill them with mistrust against me, to watch over them lest they be deceived or lest they permit me to be deceived or misdirected. Many times I have desired that the very thought of allowing me to engage in this enterprise would fade from their minds. *I received many commands from the Most High and from the Queen of heaven to write her holy life, and I continued in fear and doubt to resist these heavenly commands during all that time until the year 1637, when I began to write it the first time. On finishing it, being full of fears and tribulations, and be ing so counseled by a confessor (who directed me during the absence of my regular confessor), I burned all the writing containing not only this history, but many other grave and mysterious matters ; for he told me, that women should not write in the Church. I obeyed his commands promptly ; but I had to endure most severe reproaches on this account from my superiors and from the confessor, who knew my whole life. In order to force me to rewrite this history, they threatened me with censures. The Most High and the Queen of heaven also repeated their commands that I obey.” She was urged interiorly and exteriorly to record the facts of history revealed to her concerning the Mother of God, she resisted for twelve years and was finally induced to write only through the positive commands of her superiors. Reluctantly she began her history in the year 1637 and finished it in the year 1645, continually asking to be relieved from the task because she thought herself unworthy. As soon as the insistence of her superiors relaxed and an error of judgment on the part of an outside confessor gave her a plausible excuse, she burned all her writings, thus destroying the labor of many years. When this came to the knowledge of the higher authorities and when they insisted on her rewriting the history which continued to be supernaturally made known to her, she again succeeded in delaying the task for ten years. Only the strictest command under obedience and the threat of censures finally induced her to write the manuscript which she began in 1655 and finished in 1665, and which is still preserved in the convent of Agreda.**Gara, I disagree,:nope: and you know why!:yup: **
**Tony,
In around 1978 or so, His church came into existence in response to the "Episcopal " Church’s heavy revision of the Book of Common Prayer. Church “Protesters” felt their church had abandoned the commitment to both scripture and historical Anglicanism. The decision to allow the ordination of women:bigyikes: was just one small part of a larger theological shift introduced by the revisions and opposed by the renegades. As a result of the desire to maintain the Apostolic tradition of male-only clergy 
and the exclusive use of historical Anglican liturgical forms. A “new” “improved” church was invented. It was called the Anglican Church in North America. Later because they wanted to “borrow”, I would never say “steal”, :tsktsk: somethings from our “real” church they changed "their name to the Anglican Catholic Church. Cute isn’t it? I guess If they also took things from the Lutheran and Morman churches. They would be the Anglican Catholic Lutheran Morman Church.:whacky: I think that this makes them about number 59,947 of the 60,000 Christian churches since Número uno the RCC was established by Jesus in 33AD. ! **Indeed, PeterJ, when or where was Rob ever conceited or rude? We must respect everyone here, including thse who put a Lot of time in helping others. Anything less is a TOS violation, a false accusation against a valiant writer of Church Truth and beauty. .
**Tony,
He isn’t really Anglican nor Catholic.
I imagine it is kind of like taking the best parts from different cars to make a unique one.I am glad it isn’t my car! I think that this makes them about number 59,947 of the 60,000 Christian churches since Número uno the RCC was established by Jesus in 33AD.
I could be wrong about some of the minor details after all I am a RC not an AC! Our buddy SIA might correct some litttle things and he might shed some light of what things they actually “borrowed” and when they will return them!:extrahappy: I think our Idols, errr Icons were the big thing! We didn’t need them anyway since we have Jesus and the real sacraments . SIA was a “real” Catholic for 30 years before jumping ship and swiming away from the Thames river. He know about our real sacraments etc, and he might be willing to tell us how their new imitation church differ from our real church. ! **
Live and Learn! 
Or is it Learn and Live? Friend PeterJ trying His new idea of being naked. :bluelite: :egyptian: Trying to get his Address to mail him some leftover clothing. Better than nothing in Winter! :winter:hello,
s why Solomons brother goes to bathsheba to ask the king a favor.hello Sia,
Well Said. We find so much great knowledge here, and we all Grow in wisdom as result.
And with some of the other stuff here you can grow some Great vegetables!
- Well Said. We find so much great knowledge here, and we all Grow in wisdom as result.
And even grow Mushrooms in caves with a very few.And with some of the other stuff here you can grow some Great vegetables!
Not that I care much about the term Mary “Queen of Heaven”, since the only time in the scriptures where it’s mentioned the Queen of Heaven is a pagan deity that God wanted destroyed.hello,
Is Jesus our King? Than Mary is our Queen Mother, In Jewish Tradition and Culture, it was the kings mother, who counted not the kings wives.
That’
Rev 11:19 **Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, **and the ark of his covenant was seen within his temple; and there were flashes of lightning, voices, peals of thunder, an earthquake, and heavy hail.
Rev 12:1 And a great portent appeared in heaven, **a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; **
Rev 12:2 **she was with child **and she cried out in her pangs of birth, in anguish for delivery.
Mary Is the Phyiscal ‘Ark’ of the Covenant whom carried Christ within her.
Hello??? If that isn’t Mary? Than whom do you say it is???
Thank you John!hello,
Is Jesus our King? Than Mary is our Queen Mother, In Jewish Tradition and Culture, it was the kings mother, who counted not the kings wives.
That’
Rev 11:19 **Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, **and the ark of his covenant was seen within his temple; and there were flashes of lightning, voices, peals of thunder, an earthquake, and heavy hail.
Rev 12:1 And a great portent appeared in heaven, **a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; **
Rev 12:2 **she was with child **and she cried out in her pangs of birth, in anguish for delivery.
Mary Is the Phyiscal ‘Ark’ of the Covenant whom carried Christ within her.
Hello??? If that isn’t Mary? Than whom do you say it is???
Actually, Arglaze, Catholics believe that the woman in Revelation 12 represents both Mary and the Church.
Mwah ha ha ha … where do they come from?