That’s what I thought, thank you for confirming.
Earlier in this thread, you
stated “
I think that there is a misunderstanding that everything Brigham Young stated was taught. I think that it wasn’t.”. I then asked you “how do you know”, which you did not answer. Now, you don’t know how to know when a prophet is speaking as a prophet (which you admitted after giving a red herring answer). Very interesting. It seems as if you would like to discard what one of the prophets, seers, and revelators says when it doesn’t fit the viewpoint you’d like to present, but you cannot provide a basis for understanding objectively when we can know that the prophet was speaking authoritatively and in his prophetic office.
However, it seems to me that Mormon leaders direct their members well. They dress modestly, practice chasity, don’t drink alcohol, told to obstain from pornography, pay ithes to their church, and love their neighbor and their enemies. Not much different than Catholics. I suppose that the difference is in the worship.
No, there are various fundamental, important differences between Mormonism and Catholicism, including, but not limited to:
-the nature of God
-the nature of man
-the Fall of man
-the nature of the sacraments/ordinances, especially the Eucharist/Sacrament
-whether the Church of Jesus Christ can fail
Further, dressing modestly, not drinking alcohol, etc will not save you (though there is certainly nothing wrong with doing those things). Indeed, the LDS Church itself states that one
must receive the ordinances of baptism, confirmation, priesthood ordination (for men), endowment, and sealing, offered
only by the LDS Church, to receive eternal life, whether in this life or the next. We’re not talking about LDS leaders telling their members to dress modestly. We’re talking about the eternal relevance of a faith.