How do Mormons view Our Lady?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracepoole
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
First off, Mormonism has only been around not even a full 200 years yet, so don’t speak as though we use quotes
“OVER A HUNDRED YEARS!”. It isn’t ancient history, but even if it was, Doctrine is Doctrine. What a True Church
teaches it never yields.

Joseph Fielding Smith said:
“Christ Not Begotten of Holy Ghost… Christ was begotten of God.
He was not born without the aid of Man, and that Man was God!”
(Doctrines of Salvation, Joseph Fielding Smith, 1954, 1:18).
AND THAT WAS ONLY
60 YEAR****S AGO SO DON’T
BRING UP “HUNDRED”
AGAIN, NOT ALLOWED!
McConkie :
“These name-titles all signify that our Lord is the only Son of the Father in the flesh.
Each of the words is to be understood literally. ** Only means only**; Begotten means
begotten
; and Son means son. Christ was begotten by an Immortal Father in the
same way that mortal men are begotten by mortal fathers.”
(Mormon Doctrine, 1979, pages 546-47)
EVEN LESSER THAN 100 YEARS

And I know *Brigham Young *is over a hundred years old, so you may normally then
discount such old words, **EXCEPT he is your PROPHET!!! **Whatever word comes
out of his mouth concerning religion is supposed to be True and from God. I’m not
even going to bring up what Young said on Mary, you can find them in my earlier
responses.


😉

“nailing jello to the wall”
 
i see no relevance in cherry picking a quotation from over a hundred years ago to make a point today unless of course that hundred year old quotation is still valid. A valid argument would take a modern approach by discussing the present beliefs and not what was said over a hundred years ago by someone.

I do have this understanding that not everything that comes from a Mormon leader’s mouth is from God but also a personal opinion. However, from a historical perspective such ideas said over a hundred years ago do have relevance since history puts those ideas in their historical context.
so then,you admit, LDS leaders keep changing doctrine and teachings…good for you!
 
In my time as a Latter-day Saint, Mary was rarely mentioned or talked about in church settings (Sunday meetings, Institute, firesides, conferences). The Book of Mormon does refer to her as "a precious and chosen vessel (Alma 7:10) and as “A virgin, most beautiful and fair above all other virgins” (1 Nephi 11:15). Maybe there are hymns during Christmas time that mention her, I can’t remember. However, this is obviously a very clear difference in the emphasis that Mary receives in the Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church, and the other ancient Christian churches (and perhaps some Anglicans and Lutherans), and what one finds in the LDS Church (and perhaps most Protestant and Evangelical churches). For Catholics/Orthodox, Mary has a very important role in salvation history, and she is venerated (not worshiped) for that. Her role in these churches clearly finds continuity in ancient Israelite precedent. Mormons may very well acknowledge that she had an important role, however she does not receive any special attention nor veneration in the spiritual lives of the average Latter-day Saint. Similarly, Latter-day Saints believe in the existence of a Heavenly Mother, the eternal spouse of God the Father, however she receives no special attention nor veneration, nothing is known about her except for the fact that she exists, and no prayers are directed to her.
 
In my time as a Latter-day Saint, Mary was rarely mentioned or talked about in church settings (Sunday meetings, Institute, firesides, conferences). The Book of Mormon does refer to her as "a precious and chosen vessel (Alma 7:10) and as “A virgin, most beautiful and fair above all other virgins” (1 Nephi 11:15). Maybe there are hymns during Christmas time that mention her, I can’t remember. However, this is obviously a very clear difference in the emphasis that Mary receives in the Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church, and the other ancient Christian churches (and perhaps some Anglicans and Lutherans), and what one finds in the LDS Church (and perhaps most Protestant and Evangelical churches). For Catholics/Orthodox, Mary has a very important role in salvation history, and she is venerated (not worshiped) for that. Her role in these churches clearly finds continuity in ancient Israelite precedent. Mormons may very well acknowledge that she had an important role, however she does not receive any special attention nor veneration in the spiritual lives of the average Latter-day Saint. Similarly, Latter-day Saints believe in the existence of a Heavenly Mother, the eternal spouse of God the Father, however she receives no special attention nor veneration, nothing is known about her except for the fact that she exists, and no prayers are directed to her.
I would agree with this statement. However, I don’t think Catholics worship the Virgin Mary but they do venerate the Virgin Mary.
 
so then,you admit, LDS leaders keep changing doctrine and teachings…good for you!
I don’t know. I wasn’t around when Brigham Young was around. I have no idea just how Mormons worshipped back then or what they believed. If I put myself back then among the Mormons, living somewhere in Utah, I probably wouldn’t know much about what Brigham Young was saying. News traveled slow. I think that Mormons have been doing what they have been doing in church for a very long time. I also don’t think that every time a Mormon leader speaks, it comes from God. I think that for many they have ideas, they may pray about it, form an opinion and say it. But whether or not it all comes from God, I doubt it.

If I were a Mormon prophet I would be thinking that everyone wanted me to be perfect and when I opened my mough God would speak. I would probably be keeping my mouth closed for most of the time since I wouldn’t be allowed an opinion. 🙂
 
In my time as a Latter-day Saint, Mary was rarely mentioned or talked about in church settings (Sunday meetings, Institute, firesides, conferences). The Book of Mormon does refer to her as "a precious and chosen vessel (Alma 7:10) and as “A virgin, most beautiful and fair above all other virgins” (1 Nephi 11:15). Maybe there are hymns during Christmas time that mention her, I can’t remember. However, this is obviously a very clear difference in the emphasis that Mary receives in the Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church, and the other ancient Christian churches (and perhaps some Anglicans and Lutherans), and what one finds in the LDS Church (and perhaps most Protestant and Evangelical churches). For Catholics/Orthodox, Mary has a very important role in salvation history, and she is venerated (not worshiped) for that. Her role in these churches clearly finds continuity in ancient Israelite precedent. Mormons may very well acknowledge that she had an important role, however she does not receive any special attention nor veneration in the spiritual lives of the average Latter-day Saint. Similarly, Latter-day Saints believe in the existence of a Heavenly Mother, the eternal spouse of God the Father, however she receives no special attention nor veneration, nothing is known about her except for the fact that she exists, and no prayers are directed to her.
It may be because there are so many depictions of Mary in Catholicism, but I don’t recall much being said about Mary’s physical appearance. In my experience what is most admired and praised about Mary is her character, her willing response to God’s call not her physical beauty. For me the phrases "a precious and chosen vessel and “A virgin, most beautiful and fair above all other virgins” misses the point. The first clearly objectifies her, she is a precious thing and the second reduces her to her physical traits, also a form of objectification. But then Mary can not hold the place of wonder and amazement for LDS that she holds for Christianity because there is no Incarnation in LDS thought. And from reading the proclamation that’s just what women are supposed to do, be mothers and that’s it, so what she did was just a little bit different than what any other mother does no though is given to the idea that Mary was the mother of God.
 
I also don’t think that every time a Mormon leader speaks, it comes from God. I think that for many they have ideas, they may pray about it, form an opinion and say it. But whether or not it all comes from God, I doubt it.
So in other words you cannot trust
the words of your Mormon leaders,
not even your Prophet. Wow!
If I were a Mormon prophet I would be thinking that everyone wanted me to be perfect and when I opened my mouth God would speak. I would probably be keeping my mouth closed for most of the time since I wouldn’t be allowed an opinion. 🙂
Yeah that tends to be what many of the Mormon Presidents have done.
Keeps the LDS Church from being seen as a fraud. If the Prophet says
nothing he can’t be wrong!
BRILLIANT ! :nope:
 
I may be wrong but I think that the word ‘immaculate’ is basically a catholic word coming from Saint Bernedette. I don’t believe that other religious faiths use it at all. But I could be mistaken on this. I also think that most people have never heard of this word.
The Immaculate Conception of Mary is an early dogma of the Catholic Church which was formalized around 1854. The entire Christian world believed this up until the reformation. Saint Bernadette never said that the beautiful lady was the Virgin Mary. The priest asked Bernadette to ask the Lady what she was called. It was the Lady who said she was the “Immaculate Conception”. Bernadette, who didn’t understand what the Lady meant, reported back to the priest and he knew exactly what it meant.
 
The Immaculate Conception of Mary is an early dogma of the Catholic Church which was formalized around 1854. The entire Christian world believed this up until the reformation. Saint Bernadette never said that the beautiful lady was the Virgin Mary. The priest asked Bernadette to ask the Lady what she was called. It was the Lady who said she was the “Immaculate Conception”. Bernadette, who didn’t understand what the Lady meant, reported back to the priest and he knew exactly what it meant.
Which would put it right aroundthe time of Saint Bernedette.

wu
 
Im guessing invisible man watched the movie the Song of Bernadette and figures that the word/phrase “Immaculate Conception” was not something one would hear among lay people…
 
In the movie (the '43 version) when she tells the her priest (or was it the bishop? I dont remember) that the Lady said she was the “Immaculate Conception”. Her priest (bishop) started pressing her on where did she hear that phrase? Did she hear it in class or during catechism etc etc. (again its been a long time since I saw the movie’s depiciton)…By the priest actually pressing her as to where she had heard the phrase if anything does point the the possibility that it was something that was known. The title “Immaculate Conception” though not widely known, was not a novelty either.

If I recall correctly the history one of the things that did lend credibility to her claim is that she said that the Lady said she was the “Immaculate Conception”…and that was a theological phrase title that was not widely used by the laity, but it was known

Anyone who may have a better memory of the history of Lourdes I hope will correct me if I am wrong…
 
I would agree with this statement. However, I don’t think Catholics worship the Virgin Mary but they do venerate the Virgin Mary.
In the post you were responding to, I already stated that Catholics and Orthodox venerate Mary.
 
If I were a Mormon prophet I would be thinking that everyone wanted me to be perfect and when I opened my mough God would speak. I would probably be keeping my mouth closed for most of the time since I wouldn’t be allowed an opinion. 🙂
No one is claiming that prophets should be perfect, nor is anyone claiming that they shouldn’t be allowed an opinion. It would be helpful to know specifically when a prophet is speaking as a prophet, and when he isn’t. When does Thomas Monson speak as a prophet? In General Conference? If so, can we regard what other prophets (including the rest of the FP and Q12) have said in General Conferences as them “speaking as prophets”? That is the actual issue, and not the straw man of prophets being perfect or sharing their opinions.

Also, see this for more:

ldsguy2catholic.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/is-the-prophet-a-prophet-two-interesting-articles/
 
Which would put it right aroundthe time of Saint Bernedette.

wu
Oh dear. Perhaps you should read the posts more closely (and I had already responded to this earlier).

The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception of Mary is much more ancient than St. Bernadette. Further, the word “immaculate” is much older than St. Bernadette and the formal defining of the doctrine, and was used by various leaders, saints, etc prior to St. Bernadette. It did not originate with St. Bernadette, and if it did, please cite your evidences. See any basic dictionary for the origin of the word.
 
No one is claiming that prophets should be perfect, nor is anyone claiming that they shouldn’t be allowed an opinion. It would be helpful to know specifically when a prophet is speaking as a prophet, and when he isn’t. When does Thomas Monson speak as a prophet? In General Conference? If so, can we regard what other prophets (including the rest of the FP and Q12) have said in General Conferences as them “speaking as prophets”? That is the actual issue, and not the straw man of prophets being perfect or sharing their opinions.

Also, see this for more:

ldsguy2catholic.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/is-the-prophet-a-prophet-two-interesting-articles/
We could continue to a create a strawman and say that Joseph Smith even preceded St Bernadette so reject everything that JS said. 👍
 
No one is claiming that prophets should be perfect, nor is anyone claiming that they shouldn’t be allowed an opinion. It would be helpful to know specifically when a prophet is speaking as a prophet, and when he isn’t. When does Thomas Monson speak as a prophet? In General Conference? If so, can we regard what other prophets (including the rest of the FP and Q12) have said in General Conferences as them “speaking as prophets”? That is the actual issue, and not the straw man of prophets being perfect or sharing their opinions.
No… men like Joseph Fielding Smith and Brigham Young who were Prophets were very em-
phatic about their statements on Mary, so they meant it. Prove to me otherwise by citing a
prophet saying “Well in MY opinion…” or something like that in relation to the quotes I cited.

What about Orson Pratt and Bruce McConkie? Mormon Apostles? Who are prophets, seers,
and revelators? Such men were also very emphatic concerning Mary. Don’t you give me that
“It’s their own opinion” bull! What they taught they meant.

Yes your prophets must be perfect, at least in their words, and if they want to have a personal opinion, THEY HAVE TO POINT IT OUT! If a so-called opinion becomes Church teaching, NO IFs ANDs or BUTs!
 
Indeed, such as the ancient Syrian Fathers, even using the word “immaculate”, as well as Origen referring to her as “immaculate of the immaculate”.

As we have seen, invisible man said that he “may be wrong”, and he is indeed wrong. The word “immaculate” is not a Catholic word originating with Saint Bernadette, an LDS letter written by Harold B. Lee, cited by invisible man himself, even used the phrase “Immaculate Conception” to refer to the birth of Christ (thereby disproving his own statement that no other religion uses the word), and as I had mentioned, “immaculate” is a word that is used many times in the English language, as a simple Google search would demonstrate. Saint Bernadette did not originate the word nor the doctrine, both existed centuries before her, and invisible man will not be able to provide evidence to the contrary.

:cool:
 
Whose is back peddling? I took its importance from what happened to Saint Bernedette and the date listed on the New Advent site. I believe that Saint Bernedette made the title popular.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top