How do Protestants deal with James on faith and works?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pathway2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.
 
40.png
JonNC:
Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.
I am. And so are you.
The keys to the kingdom were given to Peter, then the disciples, and the entire Church
 
40.png
AugustTherese:
40.png
JonNC:
Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.
The keys to the kingdom were given to Peter, then the disciples, and the entire Church
No, they weren’t. They were given to Saint Peter alone, and to his successors.
 
Those were Catholic councils so that strengthens my point.
As Anglicans, we accept all seven.
Yes, when the Church was not in Schism. Part of the reason for said Schism was the later claim of papal supremacy. None of those councils make that claim.
 
40.png
JonNC:
Do you think any of those perspectives existed in the first 1,000 years of Christianity?
The Orthodox view was the view of the early Church, at least according to Pope St. Gregory and the early councils
 
The Orthodox view was the view of the early Church, at least according to Pope St. Gregory and the early councils
How does ‘The Orthodox view’ come before the existence of the Orthodox Church?
 
40.png
JonNC:
The Orthodox view was the view of the early Church, at least according to Pope St. Gregory and the early councils
How does ‘The Orthodox view’ come before the existence of the Orthodox Church?
Interesting question. You are aware of the different patriarchate that remained united after Rome split from them.
As I said, the Church Catholic goes all the way back to Pentecost, and includes more than just those in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
 
As I said, the Church Catholic goes all the way back to Pentecost, and includes more than just those in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
Don’t you think the Catholic Church decides who is and who isn’t included in Her Communion ?
 
40.png
JonNC:
As I said, the Church Catholic goes all the way back to Pentecost, and includes more than just those in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
Don’t you think the Catholic Church decides who is and who isn’t included in Her Communion ?
Others have that choice, too. Seems to me the Great Schism, like all divisions in the Church, are mutual
 
Yes, when the Church was not in Schism. Part of the reason for said Schism was the later claim of papal supremacy.
Look up the Council of Chalcedon. If the Church didn’t believe in papal supremacy, it was sure heading that route.
 
40.png
JonNC:
Yes, when the Church was not in Schism. Part of the reason for said Schism was the later claim of papal supremacy.
Look up the Council of Chalcedon. If the Church didn’t believe in papal supremacy, it was sure heading that route.
Heading that route? That’s a different take than what most Catholics here will say. It implies a development of the teaching.
The problem is the other patriarchs didn’t go along with it. Hence, the Church is now divided.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top