A
AugustTherese
Guest
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
I am. And so are you.JonNC:![]()
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
And the 7 ecumenical councils don’t eitherThis is why we don’t read texts in isolation as Catholics.
No, they weren’t. They were given to Saint Peter alone, and to his successors.AugustTherese:![]()
The keys to the kingdom were given to Peter, then the disciples, and the entire ChurchJonNC:![]()
I don’t know about you, but I want to be in communion with the one who holds the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.Indeed. Of course, it doesn’t say you have to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
As Anglicans, we accept all seven.Those were Catholic councils so that strengthens my point.
Nope. Given to the disciples and the entire Church.No, they weren’t. They were given to Saint Peter alone, and to his successors.
Where do you get that from?Nope. Given to the disciples and the entire Church.
Do you think any of those perspectives existed in the first 1,000 years of Christianity?Holy Orthodoxy
https://www.saintgeorgekearney.com/what_is_the_church.html
From the Lutheran perspective that I grew up in:
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod - Christian Cyclopedia
And this excellent article on an Anglican view:
http://www.anglicancatholic.org/anglicanism-and-papacy?class=greenlink
The Orthodox view was the view of the early Church, at least according to Pope St. Gregory and the early councilsJonNC:![]()
Do you think any of those perspectives existed in the first 1,000 years of Christianity?Holy Orthodoxy
https://www.saintgeorgekearney.com/what_is_the_church.html
From the Lutheran perspective that I grew up in:
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod - Christian Cyclopedia
And this excellent article on an Anglican view:
http://www.anglicancatholic.org/anglicanism-and-papacy?class=greenlink
How does ‘The Orthodox view’ come before the existence of the Orthodox Church?The Orthodox view was the view of the early Church, at least according to Pope St. Gregory and the early councils
Interesting question. You are aware of the different patriarchate that remained united after Rome split from them.JonNC:![]()
How does ‘The Orthodox view’ come before the existence of the Orthodox Church?The Orthodox view was the view of the early Church, at least according to Pope St. Gregory and the early councils
Don’t you think the Catholic Church decides who is and who isn’t included in Her Communion ?As I said, the Church Catholic goes all the way back to Pentecost, and includes more than just those in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
Others have that choice, too. Seems to me the Great Schism, like all divisions in the Church, are mutualJonNC:![]()
Don’t you think the Catholic Church decides who is and who isn’t included in Her Communion ?As I said, the Church Catholic goes all the way back to Pentecost, and includes more than just those in communion with the Bishop of Rome.
The Catholic Church isn’t divided. She’s One.like all divisions in the Church,
Look up the Council of Chalcedon. If the Church didn’t believe in papal supremacy, it was sure heading that route.Yes, when the Church was not in Schism. Part of the reason for said Schism was the later claim of papal supremacy.
No, sadly, we are divided. Pray His Spirit heals our divisionsJonNC:![]()
The Catholic Church isn’t divided. She’s One.like all divisions in the Church,
Heading that route? That’s a different take than what most Catholics here will say. It implies a development of the teaching.JonNC:![]()
Look up the Council of Chalcedon. If the Church didn’t believe in papal supremacy, it was sure heading that route.Yes, when the Church was not in Schism. Part of the reason for said Schism was the later claim of papal supremacy.