Ok, I like this topic so I’ll jump in too,
discipleofJesus said:
1) He claimed to be the Son of God
Anyone can do that. Especially in those days when emporers were gods, pharoahs were gods…
And in actuality,
he never claimed to be God except in a couple of places in John’s Gospel which is so radically different than the others that it hardly seems to be about the same person. Many scholars believe that it was written long after the others and is thus far less historical. It presents a highly developed Christology which was non-existant in the earlier writings.
- He proved to be the Son of God by raising from the dead
If he rose from the dead, how does that prove “godness”? There are no “resurrection” stories in the bible - there are only death stories, empty tomb stories, and conflicting, inconsistent appearance stories. The resurrection is still a matter of faith, just as the belief that he was god is purely a matter of faith.
- He performed mighty miracles
That only shows that he was a Jewish “holy man”. There were many documented holy men amoung the Jews who performed all types of similar miracles - are they all “gods”?
And just how would any of us determine that?
- He fulfilled many prophecies of the Old Testament
That is a matter of considerable debate. For one thing, it is quite easy to construct a story about someone fulfilling prophecy when one has volumes of writings to draw from, is writing years after the person died, and is intent on proving a point about the person. An understanding of Jewish prophetic writing and Jewish use of midrash techniques quickly moves this discussion to a “matter of faith” also.
- He taught the most perfect, beautiful, moral teachings
That’s pretty subjective… It is also not unique among teachers nor is it unique to Chrisianity. I’m sure the same can be said about the founder of every religion so it hardly qulifies as proof of godliness.