Not at all, I refuse to accept his interpretation. What you don’t understand is that I’m a student of the Bible.
Good for you! But Good Fellow is, too!
It is impossible for Mary to share in what Christ suffered. But she did not “share” in His suffering (especially spiritual). That is impossible.
If you say it’s impossible for anyone to share in Christ’s suffering, then how you explain these verses?
Now I rejoice in what was suffered for you, and
I fill up in my flesh what is still lacking in regard to Christ’s afflictions, for the sake of his body, which is the church. Colossians 1:24
Now if we are children, then we are heirs–heirs of God and coheirs with Christ, **if indeed we share in his sufferings **in order that we may also share in his glory. Romans 8:16-17
How can Paul fill up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions if according to you, no one can ever share in Christ’s suffering?
How are Christians supposed to share in His sufferings (exact words in Bible) if you insist that no one can ever do so?
Motherhood is a job. Jesus said to John at the foot of the cross, “behold your mother,” Jesus was severing His earthly relationship with Mary. She was now in John’s care. John was assigned to care for her, she was not assigned to care for John. Women bear children.
You do not know how insulting your statements are to all mothers including your own mother. Do you believe in heaven your mother will no longer be your mother? Even if you might want it that way, prepare to be shocked when you see Jesus still honoring His Mother in heaven!
You said she was not assigned to care for John, but Jesus also said to her, “woman, behold your son!” What does that supposed to mean?
In addition, you insist that Mary just happens to be there at the Cana wedding, she just happens to be there at the foot of the cross, she just happens to be there at the pentacost. So everything about Mary just happens to be so. Do you believe a lot of details are just coincidence in the Bible, then? Catholics do not believe so.
You refuse to even accept the possibility that perhaps these are more than coincidence. If an interpretation is not to your own liking, then you reject it as mere coincidence. Did Christ give you authority to interpret scriptures in this way?
Perhaps the Angel Gabriel just happens to find this little Jewish girl.
Perhaps Mary just happens to say that all generations will call her blessed. Doesn’t really mean anything. What presumption and self-centeredness, Mary!
Perhaps Prophet Simeon just happens to say to Mary, your Son will suffer, and you, too, will suffer for your own sin (doesn’t even make sense if you want to put it that way, but that’s what you want)!
Perhaps Jesus just happens to perform His first miracle on the request of His Mother.
Perhaps Mary just happens to love His son enough to accompany Him on His way to death.
Perhaps Jesus just happens to remember His Mother before dying and entrust her to John.
Perhaps Jesus just happens to give Mary to be John’s mother. Doesn’t John already have his own mother? Why does he need a new one? Confused!
Perhaps Mary just happens to be praying with the disciples when they received the Holy Spirit.
Perhaps Jesus just happens to need a woman who can perform the job of carrying a child.
Perhaps Jesus just happens to have to get away from His Mother in order to grow up and be all He could be.
Perhaps in heaven we all just happen to be really aloof and really really really detached from our mother so we can be the cute little angels God wants us to be.
O well, if you are satisfied with these interpretations, go ahead and enjoy! We Catholics will enjoy what is handed to us by the Church. We will enjoy a heaven where mother is still mother, gratitude is still given where it is due, honor is still given to those who bore us and nourished us.
And when we look at the life of Jesus and Mary and hear the words Jesus says, we will never say, well, that’s just a coincidence!