L
Lost_Wanderer
Guest
Since fictionalizing something makes it cease to be the same as the original meaning then two men marrying is not really marriage. Right. So why are God’s people making a big deal of this again since it obviously is not real…it’s fiction. All they did was take the same “word” Marriage and change it’s properties to mean something else yes?
Seriously, it’s bad enough you tried to make obscure connections to Da Vinci Code but gay marriage? You need a dictionary, badly. Here is how it defines fictionalizing.
fictionalize n] - To convert something into a novel or other dramatic work
holds up mirror to your face Someone needs to get out more.Wake up brother you’re sleeping deeply.
You couldn’t tell fantasy if it hit you with fairy dust.I am not anti-fantasy. I rather enjoy it.
So Tolkien, Dante, and Lewis are unoriginal then? Everyone, isn’t it just interesting how this guy avoids every single example I’ve made about how complex the imagination is? I even took the time to explain how mages in popular fantasy easily subvert popular stereotypes and he just goes on yet another rant, making obscure false comparisons (this time with gay marriage of all things).I do have a problem when people try to pass off unoriginal (not creative) concepts already occurring in occultism (witchcraft etc.) as tools to defeat the very evil that these practices and myths represent.
Tell me, is this the kind of guy you want preaching to your children?
Riiight… dancing around in a circle and chanting prayers for hours to some obscure goddess is equal to reciting a spell in less then five seconds and then hitting your enemies with a humongous thunderbolt.The details show a more than coincidental connection between the crafts and symbols used in some off these titles and the powers used in the stories are undeniable. Even by the writers themselves sometimes.
Yes, ‘coincidental connection’ indeed.