T
twopekinguys
Guest
Very good analysis, but something you may not have known is. Many top level schools were starting to refuse to play BYU (church owned) in sports because of their racist policies.Hi All,
I’ve been reading this thread for a while and I noticed that one subject never seemed to come up: Blacks and the LDS church.
My understanding is that up until 1978 it was the church’s official doctrine to severely restricted members based on their race (as ‘revealed’ by your god to your prophet Brigham Young). This was reversed with a new revelation by your prophet Spencer Kimbell in 1978.
This revelation resulted in the following beliefs held for the majority of the LDS history:
Statements by your prophet Brigham Young:
- Blacks by nature of their race were excluded to LDS priesthoods
“The Lord had cursed Cain’s seed with blackness and prohibited them the Priesthood.” (Brigham Young, 1849)
“any man having one drop of the seed of [Cain] … in him cannot hold the priesthood and if no other Prophet ever spake it before I will say it now in the name of Jesus Christ I know it is true and others know it” (Brigham Young, 1852)
Since this is historically the case, wouldn’t logic dictate that:
- Since priesthood is a fundamental step in the lives of LDS members, Blacks were thus not able to fully participate and be in communion with the LDS church and many temple ordinances.
If you believe revelations to your prophets are from your god (specifically the revelations of the late 1840/1850s compared to the 1978 revelation which are diametrically opposed) would that make your god a:
I mean the TRUE God is very consistent in his teachings. Frankly, we Catholics see everyday how this consistent teaching remains steady even with the pressures of modern society pushing against the Truth (i.e. abortion and gay marriage).
- a racist (since he excluded blacks from full communion because of their race); or
- a flip-flop (since it took him 100+ years to realize the errors of his way and he only did when enough pressure from the civil rights movement threatened the church).
But the god of the LDS seems to be willing to backtrack when enough pressure is exerted on your church.
I would love to know what an LDS apologist says about this little conundrum?
God Bless all!
Then, Viola!!! The ban is lifted. Coincidence? Divine Revelation? Which seems more plausible?
Occom’s Razor may apply here. “The simplest explanation is usually the right one.”