How is this not heresy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ReaderT
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

ReaderT

Guest
First, two points:
  1. The belief that God is a Trinity is orthodox.
  2. Claiming that a non-Trinitarian “god” (whether the Arian god, or the Sabellian god, or any other) is the true God is heresy.
By those two points, how is this statement as written not objectively heretical?
The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even his inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God.
(Vatican II, Nostra Aetate, Section 3)
The god that Muslims adore (Allah) is not the Holy Trinity - how on earth does it say that he is “merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth” ?!

Please note: I’m asking you to respond to the exact words and phrase here - this document is the focus of this thread, not things written elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Was Father Abraham a heretic? He had no idea that a Son would take flesh and redeem the world. The Islamic and Judaic understanding of God (as we know Him) is incomplete.

Do we win converts by castigating and condemnation, or by the sweet aroma of Christ’s light?
 
Was Father Abraham a heretic? He had no idea that a Son would take flesh and redeem the world.
He did know.
Didn’t you read what Jesus said in John’s Gospel? “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day: and he saw it , and was glad.”
 
Last edited:
Do we win converts by castigating and condemnation, or by the sweet aroma of Christ’s light?
Yes by Christ’s light, but if you’re offering them a heresy, you’re not offering anyone sweet aroma.

The Early Christians took such great pains to define the faith precisely, not allowing a single letter to be added incorrectly. Imagine how they would react if you say “The Muslims adore the all-powerful God” which is literally what this document says!
 
Last edited:
Muslims are monotheists. Philosophically they understand God quite similarly to how we do, as the origin and first principle of all reality. They are neither monists nor do they see God as some type of genus of creature among many other gods as the ancient Pagans did. There is a glorious truth to this shared belief. To deny the Trinity is to deny an essential self revelation of God about who he is, but it’s not a denial that God exists. It’s a grave misunderstanding of him, but not a denial of him.

This doesn’t mean Islam as a faith is wholly true or that it is equal ith Christianity. They still teach heresy.
 
Last edited:
To deny the Trinity is to deny an essential self revelation of God about who he is, but it’s not a denial that God exists.
Nobody is claiming that they don’t believe in a higher power (as did the Arians and Monists), but to say that their “higher power” is "the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth - is patently false, and worse, heretical.
 
Last edited:
Muslims don’t claim to be Christians. That, I think, is what excludes them from the “heretic” category, although (speaking from memory) Chesterton includes them as heretics and Dante placed Mohammed in Hell as a schismatic.
 
Last edited:
You’re Orthodox right? You do realise that Allah is just the Arabic word for God, said by millions of Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants throughout the entire world? By the way, someone can hold a heresy and not be a heretic, Jehovah’s Witnesses for instance, are Arians as you mentioned , but they do not have a valid baptism so are not Christian so cannot be considered Heretics
 
40.png
Wesrock:
To deny the Trinity is to deny an essential self revelation of God about who he is, but it’s not a denial that God exists.
Nobody is claiming that they don’t believe in a higher power (as did the Arians and Monists), but to say that their “higher power” is "the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth - is patently false, and worse, heretical.
Why is it patently false?
 
That, I think, is what excludes them from the “heretic” category.
Sorry if it was vague, but the part I believe is heresy is the Catholic church (Vatican 2) saying that the (non-Trinity) god they adore is nevertheless " the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth"
By the way, someone can hold a heresy and not be a heretic, Jehovah’s Witnesses for instance, are Arians as you mentioned , but they do not have a valid baptism so are not Christian so cannot be considered Heretics
Hi Adam - please see directly above (my response to Bartholomew)
You do realise that Allah is just the Arabic word for God, said by millions of Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants throughout the entire world?
Yes, but if the Catholic Church is declaring (through Vatican 2, ratified by the Pope) that the non-Trinitarian god they adore is “the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth”, how is that not a heretical statement from the Catholic Church?
 
Last edited:
Nobody is claiming that they don’t believe in a higher power (as did the Arians and Monists), but to say that their “higher power” is " the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth - is patently false, and worse, heretical.
That the “god” they adore - Allah, not the Holy Trinity - is “the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth”. Yet that’s exactly what the document says
 
Last edited:
40.png
Wesrock:
Nobody is claiming that they don’t believe in a higher power (as did the Arians and Monists), but to say that their “higher power” is " the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth - is patently false, and worse, heretical.
That the “god” they adore - Allah, not the Holy Trinity - is “the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth”. Yet that’s exactly what the document says
Allah isn’t a name. It’s just the Arabic word for God, which Christians speaking Arabic use, too.

Do you believe Jews worship the same God as Christians?
 
Allah isn’t a name. It’s just the Arabic word for God, which Christians speaking Arabic use, too.
I know, but what does that matter? Many neo-pagans use the word “God” too. Heck, many heretics (like Arius) even used the word Christ. But if their conception of God is different than ours (i.e., not the Holy Trinity) then they are heretics, and no church has the right to say that they adore the Creator of Heaven and Earth.
 
Last edited:
Do you believe Jews worship the same God as Christians?
How can they? Do they worship Christ? The sine qua non for knowing the Father, is the Son: He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father; no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me (St. John 14:6, 9). St. John the Apostle, Evangelist, and Theologian, the Apostle clearly affirms: Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father (I John 2:23).
 
Last edited:
Could he see this before the Incarnation? If so, why not a peep about “Jesus of Nazareth”? All of Israel was waiting, century upon century, for the Messiah. Did they have a realistic concept of Him? No.

That is my point, and that is why Christ had to be revealed. If we condemn others where they are, their heels will only be dug in more deeply, and we will have lost them. I’d rather not answer for that.

If we seek fault, by the power of our egos we can find fault everywhere and in everything. Is that the life of love which Christ preached? Are we smarter than the Church which Christ founded?

The reformers thought they were…
 
Last edited:
but to say that their “higher power” is " the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth - is patently false, and worse, heretical.
Isn’t that what we believe? We believe in one God. The Father Almighty maker of heaven & earth.

We believe in the Trinity, but the three is one. One God.
 
Read the edit.

I am not here to argue. Life is far too short. You are well advised to read and ponder the responses you receive and to read your cut and pastes within context.

I’m out.
 
Last edited:
there is no Trinity in the OT.
Your church teaches “there is no [manifestation of the] Trinity in the OT”?

Abraham worshipped God not at all in the form of unipersonal monotheism, but in the form of the Holy Trinity. Genesis chapter 18: “Again God appeared unto him in the plain of Mamre, as he sat in his tent door about the heat of the day. And he lifted up his eyes, and looked: and lo, three men stood by him, and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself to the ground.” The Faith of Abraham was the Faith in Jesus Christ. Such also was the Faith of the Prophet-King David, who heard the heavenly Father speaking to His Consubstantial Son: The Lord said unto my Lord (Ps. 109:1; Acts 2:34). Such was the Faith of the Three Youths in the fiery furnace when they were saved by the Son of God (Dan. 3:25); and of the holy Prophet Daniel, who had the Vision of the two natures of Jesus Christ in the Mystery of the Incarnation when the Son of Man came to the Ancient of Days (Dan. 7:13). This is why the Lord, addressing the (biologically incontestable) posterity of Abraham, said: If ye were the children of Abraham, ye would do the works of Abraham (St. John 8:39). and these “works” are to believe on Him Whom God hath sent (St. John 6:29).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top