So the clubs are private, as in “members-only?” They don’t allow anyone to just pay the cover charge and walk in? I really don’t know, please enlighten us.
And is the Internet, where many of these drag queens post photos from their “adults only” performances, upcoming events, etc. “private?” The Internet reveals all.
I find defending these child abusers outrageous.
Strip clubs are private as in minors will not be allowed in under any circumstances, neither will people who cannot afford the cover charge, and the club can refuse entry or service to anyone at any time with out requiring to give a reason. Like a private house.
In fact being, usually, licensed to serve alcohol, strip clubs in my area are legally required to refuse service to minors and patrons who are intoxicated, to conduct ID checks and so on, just like any bar.
I’m not talking about broadcasting questionable activity on the internet, and I never said I condone DQST. Nor, if anyone tried to start it, a stripper version. I said upthread that I have plenty of issues with the idea.
I also, however, have problems with the idea that a stripper, if he or she came into a library in modest street clothes, not advertising the fact that they are strippers, and wanted simply to read ‘Peter Rabbit’ to the kids and leave, they would somehow be doing something wrong by doing so. Nor do I think they should not be allowed merely by virtue of the fact that they take their clothes off for consenting paying adults in venues where children are not permitted.
Defending child abusers? Please tell me how a stripper, in the circumstances I have outlined where the children do not know they are strippers nor see them stripping, comes close to abusing any child?