"How libraries are being used to corrupt children and what you can do about it"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So the clubs are private, as in “members-only?” They don’t allow anyone to just pay the cover charge and walk in? I really don’t know, please enlighten us.
And is the Internet, where many of these drag queens post photos from their “adults only” performances, upcoming events, etc. “private?” The Internet reveals all.
I find defending these child abusers outrageous.
 
Last edited:
So the clubs are private, as in “members-only?” They don’t allow anyone to just pay the cover charge and walk in? I really don’t know, please enlighten us.
And is the Internet, where many of these drag queens post photos from their “adults only” performances, upcoming events, etc. “private?” The Internet reveals all.
I find defending these child abusers outrageous.
Strip clubs are private as in minors will not be allowed in under any circumstances, neither will people who cannot afford the cover charge, and the club can refuse entry or service to anyone at any time with out requiring to give a reason. Like a private house.

In fact being, usually, licensed to serve alcohol, strip clubs in my area are legally required to refuse service to minors and patrons who are intoxicated, to conduct ID checks and so on, just like any bar.

I’m not talking about broadcasting questionable activity on the internet, and I never said I condone DQST. Nor, if anyone tried to start it, a stripper version. I said upthread that I have plenty of issues with the idea.

I also, however, have problems with the idea that a stripper, if he or she came into a library in modest street clothes, not advertising the fact that they are strippers, and wanted simply to read ‘Peter Rabbit’ to the kids and leave, they would somehow be doing something wrong by doing so. Nor do I think they should not be allowed merely by virtue of the fact that they take their clothes off for consenting paying adults in venues where children are not permitted.

Defending child abusers? Please tell me how a stripper, in the circumstances I have outlined where the children do not know they are strippers nor see them stripping, comes close to abusing any child?
 
Last edited:
Well, they aren’t exactly showing up in modest street clothes, are they? Head scratcher.
 
What to do about it?

Burn them to the ground! Well, that is too drastic. So just select the offensive books and burn only those! Bring along sufficient amount of marshmallows so that every child can get around the campfire and roast some. They could learn the wonder of the temperature of 451 Fahrenheit!
 
You said they weren’t modest and I wanted to know for sure.
 
Oh brother. I guess those are the only two choices in your mind. Allow the female impersonators in to read to children, or burn the books.
 
Last edited:
And none of these themes should be shut down either. Allow children to be exposed to one and all in a non-threatening setting. The far right and the far left are equally culpable, in my view, and, in some peculiar way, have converged in limiting our freedom.
 
Last edited:
Why are so many people on here offended by libraries and drag queens?
 
The “both sides” argument is a false equivalency. The far right is by far the most violent political ideology in today’s world and is causing by far the most harm of any political ideology.
 
No. They’re showing up in garish and grotesque looking parodies of women. And why do women support this? Seems like black Americans supporting minstrel blackface.
Some of the makeup and costuming looks downright Satanic.
 
Why should anyone be offended, even outraged, by the indoctrination, hypersexualization and grooming of small children?
 
How is this “indoctrination”, “hypersexualization” or “grooming of small children”? Grooming for what?

What’s wrong with acknowledging the diversity of God’s creation?

Conservative political correctness is ruining the world. You can’t even be a liberal anymore without offending someone.
 
I once believed that, but no longer. I believe that both extremes are harmful. For example, the MeToo movement has destroyed many people’s careers and reputations, people who are either unjustly accused of sexual harassment or have not been afforded due process. Of course some accusations are true but, I believe, some are fabricated by those who seek attention by jumping on the bandwagon. Language is another way in which far left ideology is harming America. That doesn’t mean coarse vulgar speech should be the norm; however, today any kind of humor can be found offensive by someone who is overly sensitive and prepared to take action to prevent it. Whatever happened to the right to free speech? We don’t need far left or far right thought police in a so-called free society.
 
Last edited:
Injecting one’s own political issues, including the predictable anti-President Trump statements, into a conversation about protecting the innocence of children is very telling.
As has been said elsewhere: anyone that doesn’t see a danger to children in the images and video clips of how some of these drag queen types interact with children, is unfit to work with children.
And God didn’t “create” drag queens. They are a result of the Fall, and man’s wicked, sinful nature that resulted from the Fall.
 
Last edited:
What’s wrong with being anti-trump? There’s no mandate that I support trump, his policies or his ideology.

How is having a drag queen read to kids, denying them “innocence”? What’s wrong with being a drag queen?

You want to ban anyone who thinks its okay that drag queens exist from working with children? I miss the time when conservatives supported less government regulation.

God created literally everything and God is literally perfect. This is the literal Catholic teaching.

If anything is the result of the fall and man’s wicked, sinful nature, then it’s conservative ideology.
 
You want to ban anyone who thinks its okay that drag queens exist from working with children?
Straw man.
This will conclude my responses to your off-topic, politically ranting posts.
 
Last edited:
You’re the one that said that “anyone that doesn’t see a danger to children in the images and video clips of how some of these drag queen types interact with children, is unfit to work with children”, not me. Do you not want to ban people who think it’s okay with the existence of drag queens from working with children? Cause if you’re not, then I’m completely at a loss for what you want here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top