J
Justin_Mary
Guest
Exactly. Choose good, reject evil.I disagree. If raped and impregnated, I have rights, and I have choices.
Exactly. Choose good, reject evil.I disagree. If raped and impregnated, I have rights, and I have choices.
We don’t know beyond a shadow of a doubt that this would completely destroy the mind of this 13 year old girl.As long as you can also accept the destruction of the mind of the 13 yo girl and that she may never recover and be whole again.
In the same sense one cannot support war & call themselves a Christian. I understand there is a big difference. But killing is killing. Lots of innocents are killed in every war, whether bombing in England or Nagasaki.In my personal opinion if one is being honest with oneself, they cannot support abortion and still call themselves Christian.
You need to be more informed about the teachings of the Catholic faith regarding Capital Punishment and abortion. Perhaps, the words of Pope Benedict would help you:I have always wondered about the pro-life movement in the west opposing punishment for the women they consider have ‘murdered’. In some cases these same people support the death penalty for people who murder born human beings.
Brother there is a vast ocean between war and abortion.In the same sense one cannot support war & call themselves a Christian. I understand there is a big difference. But killing is killing. Lots of innocents are killed in every war, whether bombing in England or Nagasaki.
So in jurisdictions that continue to use the death penalty should it be applied to women wh have abortions? Some here have supported life imprisonment.You need to be more informed about the teachings of the Catholic faith regarding Capital Punishment and abortion. Perhaps, the words of Pope Benedict would help you:
“Capital punishment is death imposed on guilty individuals who had committed the most horrendous crimes; whereas, abortion is death imposed on children who are completely innocent.
Supporting capital punishment and being pro-life are consistent with Catholic teachings. Abortion is inherently immoral. In the eye of the Church, having an abortion, or helping someone procuring an abortion, is a mortal sin, and also incurs automatic excommunication.So in jurisdictions that continue to use the death penalty should it be applied to women wh have abortions? Some here have supported life imprisonment.
Suffice it to say, your affirmation in your “right to choose” puts you in direct conflict with the faith you claim to profess, as your profile states you profess to be Catholic, the Catholic teaching is that it is never ok to get an abortion on the grounds of “unwanted pregnancy” no matter the circumstances that led to the pregnancy, the Church feels so strongly about this, that one who gets an abortion for such reasons is automatically excommunicated.Grateful to live in the USA, where you can’t determine what rights I can and cannot have.
Well, yes. But separation of Church and State is not a part of Catholic teaching. How would you vote in this experimental referendum?That would be government imposing a religious tenet on the populace, and it would violate the separation of church and state.
Not, as the additions to my OP from the moderators make clear, in all cases. Only ‘direct’ abortion is proscribed by Catholic teaching. The removal of a fallopian tube containing a foetus is moral.Abortion is inherently immoral
You are spinning/misrepresenting the teachings of the Church to accommodate pro-abortion agenda. The Church is against abortion, and abortion is inherently immortal. Active medical procedures with specific goals to kill the unborn child is abortion.Not, as the additions to my OP from the moderators make clear, in all cases. Only ‘direct’ abortion is proscribed by Catholic teaching. The removal of a fallopian tube containing a foetus is moral.
Separation of Church and State isn’t Catholic teaching, but it is one of the fundamental cornerstones of our system of government. I would vote against such legislation not because I favor abortion, but because I don’t want our government – any branch of it at any level – to become a theocracy. Anytime a government imposes any teaching of any specific religion on its people, it’s a theocracy.JanR:
Well, yes. But separation of Church and State is not a part of Catholic teaching. How would you vote in this experimental referendum?That would be government imposing a religious tenet on the populace, and it would violate the separation of church and state.
Among the teachings of Christianity and of Buddhism are against murders, abuses against the poor, against abuses of consumerism, against kidnappings, human traffickings, prostitutions, etc…Anytime a government imposes any teaching of any specific religion on its people, it’s a theocracy.
If I have done so, please tell me how.You are spinning/misrepresenting the teachings of the Church to accommodate pro-abortion agenda
The Church has/would never declared:If I have done so, please tell me how.
Have you read the links in the OP about the ‘principle of the double effect’. I think you will find you are wrong.“The removal of a fallopian tube containing a foetus is moral.”