R
Randolph
Guest
No, I read it. The Magisterium is silent on Salpingectomy, Salingostomy and the use of methotextrate in dealing with ectopic pregnancy. Without going further into it, there is a heated debate among ethicists, theologians, clergy, laymen and scientists. In very, very rare cases, ectopic pregnancies survived, and the babies were delivered and lived normal lives.Have you read the links in the OP about the ‘principle of the double effect’. I think you will find you are wrong.
As in the case where the Church allows for abortion in the case when the life of the mother is in grave dangers, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Roman Catholic Church teaches the following:
“In certain cases, such as…ectopic pregnancy, it is morally licit to remove the threat of the mother’s life…by removing part, or all, of the fallopian tube where the child implanted, even though it is forseeable that the child will die as an indirect and unintended effect of such surgery. Abortion, a direct and intentional attack against the child’s life, is never morally licit.”
The removal of the Fallopian tube to kill the unborn child in itself is immoral. It however can be considered moral only in context of saving the life of the mother.
Last edited: