how not to be poor

  • Thread starter Thread starter royal_archer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
royal_archer said:
A job from which the cannot be fired??? If you are a good worker you don’t have to worry about being fired. You make it sound like it is normal for people with doctoral degrees to be getting fired.

:rolleyes:

Then maybe not all people are meant to be married if you throw that constraint on it. The church does not teach that you are expected to have babies you can not afford to raise.

That would be a lot of single men knowing that if they wanted to find a girlfriend or wife, they better get a job. That job may help burn off some of their extra energy that so concerns you.
Click to expand...
No no no! Its porves that people should either be married or in the religous life. Before the 20th century there were not you so called swinging singles. Being single isn’t a big part of human history. Remeber busniness is a means to an end , not the end.
 
royal_archer said:
Do you really belive that if a guy does not get a girlfriend or wife for a few years he will turn into a pyromaniac? If a person would he would not make a very good husband.
Click to expand...
One by himself, no. A few, no. Large groups of them, yes. (This is why everyone is terrified of what’s going to happen in China in the next few years, when 8 out of 9 Chinese men are not going to be able to find wives, because of the single-child policy when so many parents were either aborting or exposing their girls, in order to get a boy instead - the current generation is 90% male as a result.)

History bears that out.
 
pathia said:
My making the company have horrible morale? How does that work?
Click to expand...
I didn’t say it was effective just that I am sure they think it is effective. If you sense the company is not going in the right direction, then get to a new company as soon as you can.
 
aspawloski4th said:
No no no! Its porves that people should either be married or in the religous life. Before the 20th century there were not you so called swinging singles. Being single isn’t a big part of human history. Remeber busniness is a means to an end , not the end.
Click to expand...
“swinging singles”?? What?? I am simplty saying that a person should be able to stand on their own two feet before trying to support a bunch of dependents.
 
jmcrae said:
One by himself, no. A few, no. Large groups of them, yes. (This is why everyone is terrified of what’s going to happen in China in the next few years, when 8 out of 9 Chinese men are not going to be able to find wives, because of the single-child policy when so many parents were either aborting or exposing their girls, in order to get a boy instead - the current generation is 90% male as a result.)

History bears that out.
Click to expand...
Although it is for another thread. it seems like china might have an incentive to start a war to burn down its excess of male citizens.

There is a significant difference in the two situations. in China they have no hope of finding a wife. In the situation I am proposing men wait a few months maybe a year or two before finding a wife. Big difference.
 
royal_archer said:
It si funny how many people praise the ecconomic conditions in Europe but so few people are willing to leave the States to go there.
Click to expand...
HOnestly, I can’t afford to. I couldn’t sell my house for enough money to pay off my mortgage.
 
royal_archer said:
all thos e companies who cause traffic jams when all of their workers hit the street 24.5 seconds after quitting time.
Click to expand...
People can’t afford to quit if there is no other job. Families to feed, clothe, shelter, and all that.
 
royal_archer said:
[Why are people having kids prior to being financially secure enough to do so?
QUOTE]

Hmm…If someone is not financially secure into her forties, then what? And remember, we’re talking Catholics here…big families are encouraged !
Click to expand...
 
royal_archer said:
I didn’t say it was effective just that I am sure they think it is effective. If you sense the company is not going in the right direction, then get to a new company as soon as you can.
Click to expand...
I have been looking for 2years, there is very little in the terms of options for someone like me, in a market like this.
 
Iv’e got a question for Royal archer. Can in your own eyes, business ever do something wrong? You treat business as if it’s the pourpose of life rather than a tool for other things in life. if a tool no longer serves the pourpose it is supposed to serve then you replace it. We are getting very close to that with the business world. While I’m not for ending private industry all together. We need to go back to where businesses were owned by sole proprieters and partnerships and get rid of this answer to the shareholder mentality that seems to have turned business into evil ruthless monsters. Yes I think we need to get rid of Wall street to save Main street. The business world as it is right now is a private socialism in the true sense of the word.
 
royal_archer said:
What part of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness is fulfilled for the person who is having their liberties taken away so that material goods can be given to someone who did not earn them?
Click to expand...
You keep arguing against scenarios that no one is espousing. First of all no one here is talking about material goods being giving to someone who didn’t earn them. Quite the opposite we’re saying that a better share of the goods should be giving to those who have earned them.
The purpose of government is to protect the rights of individual citizens. Any law that violates one human’s rights for the pleasure of another is wrong.
Click to expand...
Sure, but since no one is espousing that we should have no problem. We’re saying that businesses should behave more ethically. If you view ethics as a violation of someones rights I don’t know what to tell you.
 
royal_archer said:
This reinforces my point that good workers will be rewarded.
No, it goes towards showing how that an ethical and quality oriented business can be successful for both the company and its employees.
Click to expand...
If you say so. Largely the skill of employees have little to do with opportunities they receive. The incompetent do very well in nation’s current business models. Being good at your job though, can at times make you a target.
While a lot of what falls under the umbrella of politics is wrong, There is nothing wrong with a manager trying to fill his team with the best workers or with the best workers trying to get on the teams with the better managers.
Click to expand...
No of course no one will blame a manager for trying to put together skilled teams. But we’re talking about the teams that actually get formed by managers, where skill is seldom a qualifier. Appearance and political acumen are usually more sought after attributes.
What you describe here with the son is not even good buisness practice.
Click to expand...
No but its common practice.
and there is an obvious reason why the company went out of buisness. This is the natural state, good companies continue on while bad companies go under.
Click to expand...
At a local level yes. A small local company must be well ran to make it. Larger companies make due from volume, and national advertisement. Sadly most companies like monarchies tend to deteriorate after the first generation.
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]
 
royal_archer said:
A job from which the cannot be fired??? If you are a good worker you don’t have to worry about being fired. You make it sound like it is normal for people with doctoral degrees to be getting fired.
Click to expand...
Well people with those degrees aren’t that common. The point is that being highly qualified, skilled or hardworking are not necessarily protections from being let go.
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Then maybe not all people are meant to be married if you throw that constraint on it. The church does not teach that you are expected to have babies you can not afford to raise.
Click to expand...
No, but relationships don’t happen on time lines. They happen when they happen. In addition, one is usually in their 30’s at least before they positioned to take on a family from a financial viewpoint. The marriage latter in life deal that’s common now, is not a good thing. Also, the idea of focusing on career is also typically bad for relationships.
That would be a lot of single men knowing that if they wanted to find a girlfriend or wife, they better get a job. That job may help burn off some of their extra energy that so concerns you.
Click to expand...
lol
 
aspawloski4th said:
No no no! Its porves that people should either be married or in the religous life. Before the 20th century there were not you so called swinging singles. Being single isn’t a big part of human history. Remeber busniness is a means to an end , not the end.
Click to expand...
And what is wrong with someone waiting a year or two until they are financially stable before settling down?

Maybe if women would be a bit m
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top