X
Xantippe
Guest
I feel like that’s more the rule than the exception.I don’t disagree, but I have learned that subtlety is utterly lost on my husband. He’s made it pretty clear that he needs more direct communication.
I feel like that’s more the rule than the exception.I don’t disagree, but I have learned that subtlety is utterly lost on my husband. He’s made it pretty clear that he needs more direct communication.
I’m all for using your words.Look, I am going to be blunt, do you have a way for me to make my 6’4” husband do something he doesn’t want to do without using my words or charm to convince him? Please share.
Methinks you have a non-real, almost cartoonishly pantomimed visualization of the concept. Like what headship would look like if you asked a kid to “draw” it. If so, that may be what’s at the heart of the matter.…Going to the doctor against your husband’s wishes is unsubmissive, isn’t it?..
…A lot of people would say that was unsubmissive of your wife…
Glad it worked out for ya. I hope it works out for him too. I hope he’s not just disengaging from a quarrelsome mate.Thank goodness he doesn’t do that anymore!
I still don’t understand what you mean by wifely submission. If the husband tells his wife not to go to the doctor and she goes, isn’t she being unsubmissive by your book? So confusing!Methinks you have a non-real, almost cartoonishly pantomimed visualization of the concept. Like what headship would look like if you asked a kid to “draw” it. If so, that may be what’s at the heart of the matter.
You’re obviously free to disagree and voice those disagreements, just as my wife is. You’re not his slave. You’re his wife. Sophomoric conflations aside, they’re obviously not the same thing.
But he is the head of the household and that means something. And that is Catholic teaching.
Glad it worked out for ya. I hope it works out for him too. I hope he’s not just disengaging from a quarrelsome mate.
“They make it a desert and call it ‘peace’”.
Anywho, we’re spinning at this point. Last word is yours.
I don’t know if that is really true. I’ve noted that more SAHMs are taking more time for themselves which is a healthy thing to do to stave off depression and isolation. That is a new trend and I’ve heard from their moms (“I didn’t get to take a day or weekend off”) well, I bet they could would have appreciated one and would have benefited from it. And in LDS homes girls are typically raised with the expectation that they will be wives, mothers, and homemakers and “valued” as such. But Utah has one of the highest rates of anti-depressant use.But I think SAHMs (or anyone) should be fairly slow to lay the blame for any particular woe at any one person’s feet. Many western SAHMs were themselves raised in a society were they grew-up expecting nearly unlimited personal freedom and the role of the SAHM was cast in a less-than-positive light.
Of course they should. Unfortunately people suffering from mental illness are not great at taking care of themselves and depression tends to distort how one views life, problems, etc. A husband who doesn’t see or respond to, or minimizes the distress of a busy mom can expect either a strong revolt or something tragic.If you feel depressed or are on the verge of killing your children (per the article you cited), I recommend you swiftly seek professional help.
I get a lot of mileage out of, do unto others as you would have them do unto you.Maybe we should just stick with the Gospels and letters from the other apostles going forward. (For discussion, I mean.)
Yes.Of course they should. Unfortunately people suffering from mental illness are not great at taking care of themselves and depression tends to distort how one views life, problems, etc. A husband who doesn’t see or respond to, or minimizes the distress of a busy mom can expect either a strong revolt or something tragic.
I would say to that that it’s important to have a support system in place but at the same time the benefit that children get by being raised by a parent rather than a nanny/institution (at least in the early years) is greater than any financial gain you’d get from working. Personally I believe the state should provide financial incentives to allow parents to stay home for the early years with their children.I personally would not want a situation where one person’s income was relied upon to support a large number of people because again, he could become disabled or die tomorrow. I went through this in my youth as my own father became seriously ill and disabled and could have died and finally did die. That experience strongly instilled in me a sense of financial responsibility for myself and any children I might have, even if my husband was the most wonderful and faithful provider in the world. While I do not think women who don’t work outside the home are “worthless” or any of that, I do think they all need to keep this in mind when making their life choices.
I feel like this sometimes. I do think women sometimes think they have made something very clear by their behaviour/wiles/whatever…sometimes that is just not the case. Men are different in this way.I don’t disagree, but I have learned that subtlety is utterly lost on my husband. He’s made it pretty clear that he needs more direct communication.
Where the heck did they get that idea?bc ‘men like it’ when women are childlike instead of acting like a normal adult.