M
mommy_k
Guest
In business, I would tell the person my first name and ask them what their first name is. Then I would refer the client to someone who was more comfortable with this.
Uh try to listen I am not answering to the theme here I am speaking only of this particular case. Understand?hu, try to think in the abstract here, ok?
The concept is this: people should be treated the way they identify. If they identify as [fill in the blank], then then that’s how I will view them.
Do you agree with the above or not?
Can you please speak to the general concept?Uh try to listen I am not answering to the theme here I am speaking only of this particular case. Understand?
Because the APA buckled to political pressure and so changed the designation. This is not to minimize the struggle and pain of such persons. I have mental illnesses of my own - for example agoraphobia. I am not going to get out on the highway and drive 70 mph when I know it’d bring on a panic attack and I might do something stupid and hurt myself or other people on the road. I deal realistically with my issues. And though of course I don’t like to be “mentally ill” anymore than the next person, I accept that we all have a cross to bear.You are aware, yes, that just a few decades ago that transgender and homosexuality were also considered “mental illness and perversion”.
So, yes it’s the same.
Because the APA buckled to political pressure and so changed the designation. This is not to minimize the struggle and pain of such persons. I have mental illnesses of my own - for example agoraphobia. I am not going to get out on the highway and drive 70 mph when I know it’d bring on a panic attack and I might do something stupid and hurt myself or other people on the road. I deal realistically with my issues. And though of course I don’t like to be “mentally ill” anymore than the next person, I accept that we all have a cross to bear.
Instead of reinforcing the unreality, we should be looking deeper into whether the transgender feelings and brain differences might be being caused by something that could be addressed medically. Even if no such cause is found, at least we will have not neglected to investigate. :twocents:
You are not listening - someone posted the picture and asked for our thoughts - maybe you should tell them to keep to the subject matter I was simply giving my thoughts on their post and you get all high and mighty and try to generalize it to the theme and twist my words - which I was not commenting on - understand.Can you please speak to the general concept?
Do you believe that people should be addressed/treated/viewed as they identify?
I understand that you were only commenting on the one case, friend.You are not listening - someone posted the picture and asked for our thoughts - maybe you should tell them to keep to the subject matter I was simply giving my thoughts on their post and you get all high and mighty and try to generalize it to the theme and twist my words - which I was not commenting on - understand.
As I said I WAS ONLY COMMENTING ON THE ONE CASE - have that persons post removed who posted the picture and the thread will go back to the subject matter
Careful, hu.You are not listening - someone posted the picture and asked for our thoughts - maybe you should tell them to keep to the subject matter I was simply giving my thoughts on their post and you get all high and mighty and try to generalize it to the theme and twist my words - which I was not commenting on - understand.
This IS on the subject matter. It speaks to the general concept: how do we treat people who identify as something everyone else sees they aren’t.As I said I WAS ONLY COMMENTING ON THE ONE CASE - have that persons post removed who posted the picture and the thread will go back to the subject matter
What if someone wants to change their name and be identified with a new name? For example, would it acceptable for someone to change their name from John Smith to Roger Thompson because they hate the name John Smith that they were given at birth?Now, I am asking you to move on and answer this question: Do you believe that people should be addressed/treated/viewed as they identify?
Sure. If that’s who he is, that’s who he is.What if someone wants to change their name and be identified with a new name? For example, would it acceptable for someone to change their name from John Smith to Roger Thompson because they hate the name John Smith that they were given at birth?
Please note that if your position cannot stand up to scrutiny, perhaps you need to re-examine what it is you are defending.Ok the person in the picture is sane and represents the transgender community.
In the first example, I guess it all depends on whether such a person can use the “I identify as disabled” defense to get out of a parking ticket for parking in a space reserved by disabled people, or if they can successfully apply for a disabled plate or placard.Also, I am curious what your thoughts are regarding the transabled?
They are folks who identify as being disabled even though they are actually fully functioning adults.
Do you have a consistent paradigm in regard to these folks, as you do to transgendered folks?
This is Chloe Jennings White, who is fully “abled” but identifies as disabled:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/medeq/files/uploads/2015/06/Transabled-1-435x517.jpg
And this is Jewel Shuping, who had normal vision, but identified as blind, and underwent a procedure (not unlike Bruce Jenner), to make her be the way she felt she actually was:
https://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/blindwoman.jpg?w=570&h=353
Was one of the schools West Point?Yeah, my son put that joke on some of his college applications. They all asked what he identified as and how he wanted to be addressed. Will be interesting to see if those colleges accept him (he’s received an early acceptance letter from his first choice school, but he didn’t identify as an attack helicopter on that one…)
You run into a problem if the person’s name is “Pat”, who used to date “Chris”, until “Chris” broke up with “Pat” to date “Sandy” (for those who are familiar with the SNL skit from the 90’s)…I just refer to a person by the name they call themselves or something close to it (I’m getting old and sort of forgetful). I’d take a stab at the pronoun independently and use whichever one I think fits, according to me. If they want to correct me, I’d just say, “Oh” and continue on using whatever strikes me as correct.
I like the old saying about calling me anything you want, but don’t call me late for dinner.
Exactly. The reality of the transgender person’s plight is something out of kilter in the brain, possibly in the endocrine system as well, depending on the individual. Why not slow down, stop rushing into efforts to alter the external package (and force society to participate in the folie a deux), and address the mismatch of perception vs. reality at the root?Denial of reality is not sane.
No, he feels that since he isn’t assigned to a unit he must be a retired airframe not suitable to be returned to service.Was one of the schools West Point?![]()