How to destroy Western Civilization without spilling your latte

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But that is exactly what we do, humans find their packs. It is bred into humans. If we didnt form into packs there wouldnt be so many different races of humans.
 
Articles like this breed guys who blame women for everything… I last went on a date with a guy who talked the whole time on conspiracy theories and how he couldn’t wait till everything collapsed, having an ‘I told you so’ attitude. Not to mention how convenient it would be to have someone cook for him so he can eat properly.

Forget about being a woman who has an education and ability to contribute to society (outside the home). While I am open to marriage and a family, God-willing, I am not in that position, and it makes me wonder, what do guys who think like this expect of us as being single ??? I suspect its because them can’t find someone to love them, so they blame the women. It’s all to easy to have a society that forces the women to “love” their husband.

In the meantime I’ve used the time God has given me as a single person to grow in the Faith, to help others, and to improve myself as a person, and I accept the fact that I may NOT be called to marriage ever.
For a lot of women, that may also be the case. If we are chaste and live our lives to please God and to help others is that such a bad thing?
 
If by packs you mean what perhaps the principle of distributism calls for,then I wouldn’t t call it packs,but bunches…
Packs,for me…has this connotation of “man wolf of man” which Hobbes dealt with and we do not incorporate from a Christian worldview.
True is that at the smallest possible level we build and solve and develop our communities for the good of each and all. But it doesn’t t end there.
We go by a more Aristotelian/ Thomistic one : we are zoon politikon.
Bunches may sound " flowery " but packs,for me…has an innate natural aggression.
If I am mistaken in how I understand " packs",let me know,Philipl,please.
 
Last edited:
I found back in my libertarian days and conventional Republican days that it was just used as a method to avoid an actual argument. I have seen far more phony accusations of racism than people actually using race as a reason to treat them unjustly.
 
I do not blame women, the real problem was the men who caved in to every demand of feminists and the men who continue to prop up the system.
 
Did you even read the article? It’s not about blaming women. Someone just threw a read herring at the beginning of the thread and suddenly it became about blaming women.
 
I do agree with the Feminist problem though - they are out of control, and I agree most of them hate men for some reason. They give good single women a bad rap when the consequences of their actions start to manifest, and then ALL women are blamed.
 
Beginning to sound a lot like you don’t believe in racism.

“Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.”
 
They do not hate men, just the bottom 4/5 of me whenever they express any sort of sexual intent. They still need them to prop up the system though.
 
Heh, wow I imagine you would have some words with Thatcher about that little idea. You have fun with your sexism, I doubt you have any worthwhile ideas to hear.
 
The Japanese have a higher average IQ than whites. Does that give them an advantage? Yes. What is so evil about saying that?
 
You are currently speaking with a person who believes women should not have the vote; I’m interested to hear your opinion on suffrage.
 
Thatcher was an outlier. I just need to point to the Democrats and one of their major demographics to make my point.
 
I am not a believer in democracy in general so there are quite a few people who would not be voting in my worldview.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top