G
Goya
Guest
nojesusnopeace;12346818]
Would you seriously look Christ in the eyes, and tell Him that you thought His mother was of inferior worth and/or dignity, than the Ark of the Covenant–because she only carried Him for a mere 9 months inside of her, while the Ark of the [old] Covenant, was designed to hold the TABLETS for a much longer period of time???
What, no credit for the birth itself, the infancy, childhood, puberty, early adulthood…not even for the fact that she was a human being who shared a real human relationship with Him, while the Ark of the Covenant–for all it’s value–was an inanimate object?

It speaks nothing at all to the glaring omission to which I expressly referred.
Let me break it down for you even more basically:
Christ never so much as mentioned a thing that would come into being, called “the Bible”.
Christ not only expressly mentions His Church and prophesies it…the Gospels relay the story of how He went about establishing it, to wit: assembling the Apostles, instructing them, bequeathing his authority to them, and finally sending them His promised and prophesied Holy Spirit (Paraclete/advocate) at the Pentecost.

Wow. That was a rhetorical soft ball. You actually confirmed that you believe God valued the Ark of the Covenant, more than the Ark of the New Covenant, His Blessed Virgin Mother?I don’t believe that to be a valid analogy. The ark that held the commandments was to hold the tablets for all time. Mary carried Christ for 9 months… big difference.
Would you seriously look Christ in the eyes, and tell Him that you thought His mother was of inferior worth and/or dignity, than the Ark of the Covenant–because she only carried Him for a mere 9 months inside of her, while the Ark of the [old] Covenant, was designed to hold the TABLETS for a much longer period of time???
What, no credit for the birth itself, the infancy, childhood, puberty, early adulthood…not even for the fact that she was a human being who shared a real human relationship with Him, while the Ark of the Covenant–for all it’s value–was an inanimate object?
Your colorful flow chart is nothing more than an academic exercise in vanity.I explained this in depth in another thread, but here I’ll provide a chart to support scripture alone. This is just a comparison to another translation, but if you’ll look at the origins of the King James Version, you’ll see why many conclude that The Bible, The KJB in particular, is the inspired and sole word of Go-.
i136.photobucket.com/albums/q193/crinie123/bib1.jpg
It speaks nothing at all to the glaring omission to which I expressly referred.
Let me break it down for you even more basically:
Christ never so much as mentioned a thing that would come into being, called “the Bible”.
Christ not only expressly mentions His Church and prophesies it…the Gospels relay the story of how He went about establishing it, to wit: assembling the Apostles, instructing them, bequeathing his authority to them, and finally sending them His promised and prophesied Holy Spirit (Paraclete/advocate) at the Pentecost.