J
Julian_Bashir
Guest
NSA hasnt done anything in violation of law, but we have still have people up in arms, saying it is unjust and unethical. I don’t think laws carte blanche protect us from doing God’s will. The laws in place must be just.She can call the police.
Tho I don’t think this doctor is doing anything against the law.
But this friend interfering just might be…
.
The question is whether nor not the person was sure this was an abortion, which morally is no different than knowing they were going to murder their spouse, and if they knew, what could they do.
Again, the law is frankly irrelevant unless it if protecting a just act. Laws in other countries allow for stoning a woman who has been raped. I wouldn’t hide behind the law in that case either - the stoning is always wrong, and most people would do what they could to stop it.
Again, the question is whether or not the OP could know indeed something immoral was going on; that’s where it gets dicey.
A) You are correct that she may not have known. We don’t have enough info.True. But she didn’t know that was the case. And she didn’t have the right to know.
B) There is no right to privacy morally speaking for murder, if it was abortion. There was no right to privacy for Aaron Hernandez in the alleged murder of Odin LLoyd. The right to privacy would only apply to just acts. All laws only apply to just acts. How best to handle the situation in each case is what is at issue. We have sidewalk counselors at the abortion clinic where we pray. They confront women going in, educate them, and pray with them. They do not of course forcefully stop them. Again, we talk about the right to privacy in absolute terms, when no law that does not come from God can be spoken of in absolute terms. This isn’t to say a person may not violate US law, but that is secondary to doing the right thing.