B
Baho
Guest
Me too honestly it’ll be nice to watch the chiefs squash them tonight.
Texans won’t be the same without DeAndre Hopkins. But we’re off topic, so I’ll stop at that!Me too honestly it’ll be nice to watch the chiefs squash them tonight.
Asking your wife how she feels about a situation or action directed at HER is new age and passive? Yikes. I’ll let my husband know he should just go all caveman next time I’m appreciated by another man . As a woman, the response from my husband that makes me feel safe and sexy is when he puts an arm around me, looks the man in the eye with a smile and wink or nod, and I know I get to go home with him. Usually, the catcalling or hitting upon man smiles and nods back in appreciation. Now, is that so difficult? I know my husband would defend me in an instant if anything was physical or continued to be inappropriate; he was in law enforcement and can take a man down in a flash. He’s also wise and knows de escalation is preferable and that he doesn’t need to puff out his chest and claim his woman to be masculine. Probably helps he’s well over six feet. And he truly cares about how something effects me and how I’d prefer it be handled…there is nothing new age about respecting your wife.Asking you to consult your wife first and just take it if she says it’s alright for dudes to hit on her is the most passive, new age, grossly feminist response there is imo.
That is stretching the Catechism ever so slightly. CCC 2265 says “Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others.”No. Catholic teaching is that the use of force, including lethal force, against an unjust aggressor can be obligatory . Which means that you’re required to do it and that you commit a sin if you don’t
It’s odd that you claim that it doesn’t imply what it explicitly says.“Can be a grave duty” does not imply that it would be a sin not to.
Yes. It affirms that I have the duty to defend my family.“Responsible for the lives of others” is significant too.
I’m just going by the words on the page, not changing them to mean something more. It does not say that it would be a sin to fail in this duty. You said that on your own.It’s odd that you claim that it doesn’t imply what it explicitly says.
You appear to not understand the meaning of the words “grave” and “duty”.I’m just going by the words on the page, not changing them to mean something more. It does not say that it would be a sin to fail in this duty.