L
LethalMouse
Guest
Not when you chose not to BahmanNo, but that is a different problem. We are cognitively open to understand things. We use verbal communication to exchange ideas. We can have the same understanding of Meaning if you really know it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e16e/6e16ef8e11be3032b3355d558fcfe3bfc779b619" alt="Frowning face with open mouth :frowning: 😦"
If you live before the internet and cameras, and a man from China tells you what China is like, why debate him?That is only a claim. You cannot prove it.
So we were told of this and I have literally NO opposing stories to consider from any sources that suggest otherwise
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8e8f/e8e8f10ee7969490cfdc1dc1612ff37bbd0ae6f5" alt="Face with tongue :stuck_out_tongue: 😛"
That is why next to Cat I put: (by choice)I don’t think that this analogy works because God created us as intellectual beings. So I think that we are able to understand all mysteries including Meaning knowing the fact that God love us otherwise we fall in state of despair.
Meaning that you do have the capabilities possibly to not be the cat…
But when explaining anything to Bahman it feels very much like trying to explain the stock market to a cat.
Yet here you are with ideas and definitions standing alone, and without any sense of peace.That is not correct. I think that is your failure to understand Evil well. I have already explain that to you.
Here you are asking others who all disagree with you how they have what you want.
Here you are telling them that they are wrong while still asking them how they have what you want.
The cat does not think about the stock market… but the stock market is still trueI don’t think so.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8e8f/e8e8f10ee7969490cfdc1dc1612ff37bbd0ae6f5" alt="Face with tongue :stuck_out_tongue: 😛"