S
SeriousQuestion
Guest
Or St. Paul is using different words to say the same thing.
You keep proving my point as this is once again telling them to allow the spirit to carry to completion what has already been done, similar to what we discussed in James.Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling,
How can something be brought to completion that has already been done?to allow the spirit to carry to completion what has already been done
I couldn’t find the verse.just as Abraham was long before he offered Isaac as a sacrifice.
Quit trying to misrepresent what we do not confess to believe. The Catholic Church anathamatizes works done without divine assistance. You are building a straw man and caricaturing Catholic teaching.So stop trying to justify yourself through your works
We are just before God by what we are, not merely what we are declared to be. We are justified because we have been sanctified through Baptism.AugustTherese:![]()
Thank you for illustrating my point. Paul draws the distinction between sanctification and justification right here.“And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”
Works of the Law, under the law, without grace, he sure does. But, what you seem to be obstinately refusing to understand, is that there are works of grace, done through the Spirit living within us!Unfortunately Paul anathematizes the addition of works to justification
Again, the distinction is that you are trying to argue that the works earn us grace which Paul has already expressly denied. Grace is freely given through faith. And it is our response to grace already given through the holy spirit that we are capable of doing works. But again, and Paul draws this statement as well, it is not for effect of justification. Paul reiterates this repeatedly even when talking about the works that we do in Romans 4. We can keep progressing through Romans if you like until you have read the whole thing in context.Works of the Law, under the law, without grace, he sure does. But, what you seem to be obstinately refusing to understand, is that there are works of grace, done through the Spirit living within us!
Define works of the Law please.AugustTherese:![]()
Again, the distinction is that you are trying to argue that the works earn us grace which Paul has already expressly denied. Grace is freely given through faith. And it is our response to grace already given through the holy spirit that we are capable of doing works. But again, and Paul draws this statement as well, it is not for effect of justification. Paul reiterates this repeatedly even when talking about the works that we do in Romans 4. We can keep progressing through Romans if you like until you have read the whole thing in context.Works of the Law, under the law, without grace, he sure does. But, what you seem to be obstinately refusing to understand, is that there are works of grace, done through the Spirit living within us!
The 16th century, novel, Protestant context? Nah, I’ll let the Church that Jesus Christ founded decide the context.We can keep progressing through Romans if you like until you have read the whole thing in context
When have I came even remotely close to even hinting or alluding to such a concept?!?! Those are your words, not mine. Perhaps you could get it out of your head that ‘works earn us grace’. Again, that is due to your lack of understanding of which kinds of works Saint Paul condemns and which ones he encourages in the real of justification before God.you are trying to argue that the works earn us grace which Paul has already expressly denied