E
EIF5A
Guest
Is it holy because it’s in Latin or does that just enhance the historicity/tradition? Do people who attend Latin Mass study/understand Latin?
A language that people cannot understand does not seem “simple” to me. It’s kind of like speaking in tongues — it’s great for personal building in faith and if there’s an interpreter, but by itself, does it build the Church?

Personally, I would like a church that combines both Catholic solemnity with Protestant zest. There is a time to reflect on the sacrifice of Christ and a time to rejoice and live a rich life according to the will of God. I get the feeling the latter should be not practiced during Catholic worship.
A language that people cannot understand does not seem “simple” to me. It’s kind of like speaking in tongues — it’s great for personal building in faith and if there’s an interpreter, but by itself, does it build the Church?
I read today about St. Francis preaching and how it transformed people. Are people not allowed to feel emotions and desire to change their lives? How long do you think he or St. Paul preached? If a certain person preached to such an effect that he changed lives for God, is it bad to desire to hear him more? (Assuming the message is doctrinally sound.) Also, I’m amused that 30 minutes was included in that list of minutes considered lengthy.In fact, it’s very easy to see personality cults arise in certain churches where orators, great rhetoricians, are preaching 30, 40, 50 minutes each Sunday. People come and really measure their experience on the basis of how motivated, how informed and how excited they feel at the end of the sermon.
Personally, I would like a church that combines both Catholic solemnity with Protestant zest. There is a time to reflect on the sacrifice of Christ and a time to rejoice and live a rich life according to the will of God. I get the feeling the latter should be not practiced during Catholic worship.
:harp: