I think healthy skepticism is a sign of good sense–infact this book falls under the category of private revelation as do all NDE’s which means that the Catholic church neither accepts them as true nor denies them as a ruse and we’re all free to believe or not as we choose. Another example of a personal revelation is all the stuff supposedly happening in Medjugorde. I know several people who absolutely swear that the Blessed Virgin appears there all the time–now me, I don’t buy that either frankly. If it is legitimate, I’m pretty sure that one day Mary will do something big enough to make it plain as day to all of us, just as she did at Lourdes and Fatima. If not, well then I doubt I’ll ever believe it–though I am always interested in hearing what people say is going on somewhere. I listen and then file it away under “possibly happened–possibly someone’s on crack”! LOL!
To me, the boy’s religion has zero relevance on whether the NDE is true or not. I believe that if God wanted to appear to a protestant child that He would do so–Jesus loved children and protestants certainly can go to heaven too. To me, the fact it happened to a child IS the one and only fact that gives the story any credence at all–because, remember this little boy was very ill when the NDE supposedly happened----but in truth, he never actually died, flat lined or anything anywhere close to that. Thus, I’m not sure that one can even logically call it a possible NDE–as the kid never came all that close to dying–it would be more of a vision in my opinion–again, if it really happened! The bottom line is that it was a fairly good book when I read it–but I have a healthy skepticism.