This is a good question to ask yourself. Why can’t you agree with your mother? Your disagreements are the closest example to you of this question.Why can’t chritistians just have one church and agree on everything instead of having divisions.
No, but you can certainly go about it the wrong way and violate the fourth commandment.I hardly think trying to save your parents’ souls is against the fourth commandment.
True. My point was simply saying it’s better to do than to know. We should be more focused on living our faith than memorizing chapter & verse.It shouldn’t be an either or. We most definetely should be living our faith and knowing or Bible
Honestly David, it is you who are violating the forum rules. We are called to respect the faith of others, just as we would have them respect ours. This forum is a place for people to seek Catholic Answers. There is no requirement here that one be a Catholic to be a member of CAF.get off this forum. You are not welcome.
The OP (original poster) must first attend to his/her own heart.have bogus theology and false interpretations of the Catechism fooled us all?
We don’t want to convert people using human methods. Yes, we can persuade people to do a great many things, but true conversion of the heart is an action of the Holy Spirit.It is not true that we cannot convert people.
Assuming that their souls are not on the path to salvation may be an act of arrogance.I hardly think trying to save your parents’ souls is against the fourth commandment.
Well, if your standard is anything close to what your posts have reflected, then it has already been crossed!Of course, but I highly doubt the OP has crossed that line or will any time soon.
Have you ever met a teen who is not full of themselves?No but I think with the name dictatorczar he comes across like he is being a little disrespectful
Considering that this question is very important I would like to know what your answer is. From my perspective and understanding, anyone who lived in the centuries before the Reformation who had inclinations to form beliefs similar to the modern Baptist Church beliefs were mostly exterminated after the fourth century.This is something you have to do very gently, don’t go in on the attack, just kind of do it over time, ask, this very important question, when you get to this point, why was there no Baptist Church until about 1607? Build a conversation from there, because you don’t want to push people away
I think we can also assume that there are very many “Catholics” in the pews, and far more that don’t even occupy the pews anymore, that are in need of conversion. We have our own house that needs cleaning, such that we don’t need to turn into fruit inspectors for denominations.Assuming that Baptists are in need of conversion is not arrogance. It is an assumption we all ought to make.
put your arms around her and kiss her and then never mention religion again unless she brings it up. Then study all you can so that you will have a full understanding of Catholicism and be ready when she decides to ask you about the Catholic Church.So please help me convert her with something persuasive
From an old post of mine. . . .I love history . . . .
The Baptist tradition was invented in the early 1600’s.
John Smyth (sometimes spelled “Smith”) invented it.
Below is an except from the Protestant Magazine, Christianity Today . . . .
. . . . Smyth’s Amsterdam was also home to many Anabaptist Mennonites, who had for two generations practiced adult baptism based on a personal confession of faith. On this issue, Smyth finally broke with the Separatists. If the Church of England was, as he believed, “the Church of Antichrist,” its baptism must be false. In fact, he wrote in The Character of the Beast (1609), the baptisms of all established churches were false. And the New Testament never even mentioned infant baptism—only the baptism of believing adults.
“Baptism is not washing with water,” he wrote, “but it is the baptism of the Spirit, the confession of the mouth, and the washing with water: how then can any man without great folly wash with water which is the least and last of baptism?”
So, believing that there was no true church from which a valid baptism could be obtained,
Smyth baptized himself . . . .. . . . Eventually, Smyth applied for membership with the Mennonites. Helwys, who agreed with Smyth on nearly every point but could not accept Mennonite teachings on Christ and ministerial succession, recommended to the church that Smyth, then in bad health, be excommunicated. In 1611 they agreed. Smyth continued to defend his membership with the Mennonites up to his death in 1616. But to this day, it is not as a Mennonite that he is remembered, but as the first Baptist .
Thank you very much @thequeen! I appreciate it. I have no plans to go anywhere.Please do not leave you are more than welcome only the moderators can tell someone to get off this forum and you have not posted anything that they would make them ban you.Besides I always enjoy reading your posts.