N
Needy1
Guest
Change it please.I’d say “incorrect.” I can change it, if you’d like.
Change it please.I’d say “incorrect.” I can change it, if you’d like.
If you believe Catholicism is true, neither God nor angels throw the damned to hell by force.goout:
In your opinion then:
How do people become separated from God?
And how does one attain union with God?Firstly, I think, God or Angels would throw the damned to hell, by force, if either Catholicism or Islam was the truth. Like the Rev stated.In your opinion, how do people end up separated from God,
AND,
how do people end up united to God in the beatific vision?
If you could answer this question it would clarify the discussion, because it is not clear if you don’t believe in hell, or just can’t understand how someone ends up in that state.
Secondly, I think a faith that unite people with God is a gift from God, if that faith is belonging to the one true religion the truth.20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
It is enough to recall here that there are two
notice-boards (as it were) to guide us, two general principles which secure
us from misconceptions. On the one side, it is universally admitted,
against the Pelagians, that nobody ever goes to heaven except through the
free grace of perseverance. On the other side it is universally admitted,
against the Calvinists, that nobody ever goes to hell except through his
own fault.
If you believe Catholicism is true, neither God nor angels throw the damned to hell by force.
Why? How do you refute against the verse of Rev while you’re believing that the Bible is word of God?Agree with you.
Heck, if God were going to throw unsuspecting people into hell, he would be a monster and I would not worship him.
I don’t know the truth because I’m not a prophet. However what “that truth” you have said mean? Catholicism?If you don’t believe Catholicism is true, then are you honeslty looking for that truth? Or are you disputing it in favor of some other truth?
Then, why wouldn’t these people torture themselves until themselves die? If they’re rational person, they would not torture themselves.People make choices that are bad for themselves all the time knowing full well the consequences…why would the choice of hell be any different?
So, if God send these Catholics who practice contraception, without a permission of priests and a economical reason, to hell to give them eternal torment, God is right and just, right?if there was no consequence for doing evil I would say God was unjust rather than a just God.
I think all of sinners would chose the eternal mass on church rather than eternal fire in hell.the ones in “Hell” expect that they would become even more miserable, if they would come to “Heaven”.
Hangover appear to people regardless of their free will. Because of the weakness of a body. Most drunken people doesn’t want to get hangover.by the same logic, no one would choose to have a hangover? From which we’d have to conclude that either no one ever had a hangover, or that someone comes and imposes hangovers on people against their will?
This is considered intrinsic evil, no priest or economical reason can ever justify it. The Catholic Church clearly teaches it is contrary to natural law.Catholics who practice contraception
So most people who walking on wide path will be damned? Why would God give that situation to humans? It’s obvious that most people would be damned if God prepare hell.Do you believe Jesus’s words? I’m asking, because He Himself talked about us choosing the narrow or wide path. Nobody is forced to go one way or the other.
So “love me or burn”?God can and will always help those that seek help, but He can’t force anyone to choose Him.
Why. According to your logic, the psychopaths are invulnerable to sin. And invincible.Every human “does” or commits sin.